In:Digital and Internet-Based Research Methods in Applied Linguistics
Edited by Matt Kessler
[Research Methods in Applied Linguistics 15] 2026
► pp. 244–264
Chapter 12Screen capture
Published online: 5 January 2026
https://doi.org/10.1075/rmal.15.12mar
https://doi.org/10.1075/rmal.15.12mar
Abstract
This chapter discusses screen capture (i.e., the recording of users’ on-screen activities) as a
data collection method in online-based research in applied linguistics. After providing background information on the
research contexts in which both still image and video screen captures have been used, we offer an overview of the
types of phenomena previously studied through analyses of screen captures, the implementation of this data collection
method in existing research, and the most commonly adopted analytical approaches (e.g., conversation analysis,
thematic coding). Afterwards, we showcase exemplary empirical research using screen captures, including studies
exploring digital discourse or written/oral interactions in non-educational virtual locales (e.g., social media,
messaging apps) as well as within computer-assisted language learning settings. Following a discussion of the ethical
issues and challenges associated with this data collection method, we propose future research directions (e.g.,
human-AI interaction, linguistic practices, and communication in virtual realities).
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Frequently asked research questions
- 3.Implementation
- Still images
- Video screen captures
- Annotating and analyzing screen captures
- 4.Example studies
- Vinall et al. (2024)
- Smith (2009)
- Balaman (2021)
- Gan et al. (2023)
- Luzón (2023)
- Han and Reinhardt (2022)
- 5.Ethics and research integrity considerations
- 6.Challenges and issues
- 7.Future research directions
References
References (40)
Balaman, U. (2021). The
interactional organization of video-mediated collaborative writing: Focus on repair
practices. TESOL
Quarterly, 55(3), 979–993.
Baralt, M. (2013). The
impact of cognitive complexity on feedback efficacy during online versus face-to-face interactive
tasks. Studies in Second Language
Acquisition, 35(4), 689–725.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using
thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in
Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
Canagarajah, S., & Dovchin, S. (2019). The
everyday politics of translingualism as a resistant practice. International
Journal of
Multilingualism, 16(2), 127–144.
Chen, L., & Rodway, C. (2023). Distance
students’ language learning strategies in asynchronous and synchronous
environments. CALICO
Journal, 40(2).
Cho, H. (2017). Synchronous
web-based collaborative writing: Factors mediating interaction among second-language
writers. Journal of Second Language
Writing, 36, 37–51.
De Roock, R., Bhatt, I., & Adams, J. (2016). Video
analysis in digital literacy studies: Exploring innovative
methods. In H. Snee, C. Hine, Y. Morley, S. Roberts & H. Watson (Eds.), Digital
methods for social science: An interdisciplinary guide to research
innovation (pp. 105–121). Palgrave Macmillan.
Divita, D. (2023). The
gendered semiotics of far-right populism on Instagram: A case from
Spain. Discourse &
Society, 34(1), 22–53.
Dutt, S., & Graham, S. (2023). Video,
talk and text: How do parties communicate coherently across modalities in live
videostreams? Discourse, Context &
Media, 55, 100726.
Elola, I., & Mikulski, A. (2013). Revisions
in real time: Spanish heritage language learners’ writing processes in English and
Spanish. Foreign Language
Annals, 46(4), 646–660.
Gan, Y., Greiffenhagen, C., & Kendrick, K. H. (2023). Sequence
facilitation: Grandparents engineering parent-child interactions in video
calls. Research on Language and Social
Interaction, 56(1), 65–88.
Gánem-Gutiérrez, G. A., & Gilmore, A. (2023). A
mixed methods case study on the use and impact of web-based lexicographic tools on L2
writing. Computer Assisted Language
Learning, 36(7), 1365–1391.
Guichon, N. (2017). Sharing
a multimodal corpus to study webcam mediated language teaching. Language
Learning &
Technology, 21(1), 55–74. [URL].
Hamel, M. J., & Séror, J. (2016). Video
screen capture to document and scaffold the L2 writing
process. In C. Caws & M. J. Hamel (Eds.), Language-learner
computer interactions: Theory, methodology and CALL
applications (pp. 137–162). John Benjamins.
Han, Y., & Reinhardt, J. (2022). Autonomy
in the digital wilds: Agency, Competence, and Self efficacy in the development of L2 digital
identities. TESOL
Quarterly, 56(3), 985–1015.
Hellermann, J., & Thorne, S. L. (2022). Collaborative
mobilizations of interbodied communication for cooperative action. The Modern
Language
Journal, 106(S1), 89–112.
Ho, W. Y. J. (2021). ‘I
knew that you were there, so I was talking to you’: The use of screen-recording videos in online language
learning research. Qualitative
Research, 21(1), 120–139.
Hyland, K. (2005). Stance
and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse
Studies, 7(2), 173–192.
Kessler, M., Marino, F., & Liska, D. (2023). Netnographic
research ethics in applied linguistics: A systematic review of data collection and reporting
practices. Research Methods in Applied
Linguistics, 2(3), 100082.
Koh, J. (2023). “Date
me date me”: AI chatbot interactions as a resource for the online construction of
masculinity. Discourse, Context &
Media, 52, 100681.
Larsen-Freeman, D. (1997). Chaos/complexity
science and second language acquisition. Applied
Linguistics, 26, 141–165.
Luzón, M. J. (2023). Multimodal
practices of research groups in Twitter: An analysis of stance and
engagement. English for Specific
Purposes, 70, 17–32.
Lyons, A. (2020). Negotiating
the expertise paradox in new mothers’ WhatsApp group interactions. Discourse,
Context &
Media, 37, 100427.
McMahan, C., Hovland, R., & McMillan, S. (2009). Online
marketing communications: Exploring online consumer behavior by examining gender differences and interactivity
within Internet advertising. Journal of Interactive
Advertising, 10(1), 61–76.
McMahan, T., Parberry, I., & Parsons, T. D. (2015). Evaluating
player task engagement and arousal using electroencephalography. Procedia
Manufacturing, 3, 2303–2310.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative
data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd
ed.). Sage.
Mondada, L. (2014). Conventions
for multimodal transcriptions. [URL]
(2018). Multiple
temporalities of language and body in interaction: Challenges for transcribing
multimodality. Research on Language and Social
Interaction, 51(1), 85–106.
Mroz, A. P. (2014). Process
research screen capture. In C. A. Chapelle (Ed.), The
encyclopedia of applied linguistics. Wiley.
Park, K. (2012). Learner–corpus
interaction: A locus of microgenesis in corpus-assisted L2 writing. Applied
Linguistics, 33(4), 361–385.
Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence
organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis. Cambridge University Press.
Smith, B. (2009). The
relationship between scrolling, negotiation, and self-initiated self-repair in an SCMC
environment. CALICO
Journal, 26(2), 231–245.
Smith, B., & Sauro, S. (2009). Interruptions
in chat. Computer Assisted Language
Learning, 22(3), 229–247.
Smith, B. E., Pacheco, M. B., & de Almeida, C. R. (2017). Multimodal
codemeshing: Bilingual adolescents’ processes composing across modes and
languages. Journal of Second Language
Writing, 36, 6–22.
Tang, J. C., Liu, S. B., Muller, M., Lin, J., & Drews, C. (2006). Unobtrusive
but invasive: Using screen recording to collect field data on computer-mediated
interaction. Proceedings of the 2006 20th Anniversary Conference on Computer
Supported Cooperative Work, 479–482.
Vinall, K., Wen, W., & Hellmich, E. A. (2024). Investigating
L2 writers’ uses of machine translation and other online tools. Foreign
Language
Annals, 57(2), 499–526.
