In:Digital and Internet-Based Research Methods in Applied Linguistics
Edited by Matt Kessler
[Research Methods in Applied Linguistics 15] 2026
► pp. 103–122
Chapter 6Social media
Published online: 5 January 2026
https://doi.org/10.1075/rmal.15.06oli
https://doi.org/10.1075/rmal.15.06oli
Abstract
This chapter explores social media as a site for applied linguistics research and the methods that
are used for such studies. To date, the majority of social media studies have examined platforms such as Facebook,
YouTube, and Twitter/X. Increasingly, however, researchers are also exploring platforms such as Instagram, WhatsApp,
and Tik Tok, among others. Topics for study include how language is used — including translanguaging — and how users
create their cultural and linguistic identities via different platforms and how learners can develop and expand their
language and literacy. We outline the different ways data are captured and the various methods used for analysis
(e.g., meta-analysis, discourse analysis, ethnographic approaches). We exemplify these, and the different theoretical
frameworks used by describing five different studies. We also provide commentary on some of the ethical issues and
challenges related to social media research. We conclude by providing suggestions for future research.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Frequently asked research questions
- 3.Implementation
- Sites/topics of inquiry
- Research methods
- Data analysis
- 4.Example studies
- Dovchin and Shinjee (2022)
- Qassrawi and Al Karasneh (2023)
- Hanna and Nooy (2003)
- Oliver and Exell (2024)
- Duek and Nilsberth (2022)
- 5.Ethics and research integrity considerations
- 6.Challenges and issues
- 7.Future research directions
References
References (37)
Al Jahromi, D. (2020). A
quantitative study of the perceived impact of social media networks on Bahraini users’ English Language
Learning, Teaching English with
Technology, 20(4), 23–40.
Androutsopoulos, J. (2015). Networked
multilingualism: Some language practices on Facebook and their
implications. International Journal of
Bilingualism, 19(2), 195–205.
Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander
Studies. (n.d.). Guidelines for ethical research in
Australian Indigenous studies. Retrieved on 23 September 2025 from [URL]
Bessarab, D., & Ng’andu, B. (2010). Yarning
about yarning as a legitimate method in Indigenous research. International
Journal of Critical Indigenous
Studies, 3(1), 37–50.
Cooper, H. M. (1998). Synthesizing
research: A guide for literature reviews (applied social research
methods). Sage.
Darvin, R. (2016). Language
and identity in the digital age. In P. De Costa & B. Norton (Eds.) The
Routledge handbook of language and
identity (pp. 523–540). Routledge.
De Costa, P. I. (2015). Ethics
in applied linguistics research. In B. Paltridge & A. Phakiti (Eds.), Research
methods in applied linguistics: A practical
resource (pp. 245–257). Bloomsbury.
Dizon, G. (2016). A
comparative study of Facebook vs. paper-and-pencil writing to improve L2 writing
skills. Computer Assisted Language
Learning, 29(8), 1249–1258.
Dovchin, S. (2024). Beyond
translingual playfulness: Translingual precarity. Language in
Society, 54(4), 609–636.
Dovchin, S., & Oliver, R. (2021). English
and Social Media. Translingual Englishes, Identities and
Linguascapes. In B. Schneider, T. Heyd, & M. Saraceni (Eds.), Bloomsbury
World Englishes Volume 1:
Paradigms (pp. 128–14). Bloomsbury.
Dovchin, S., & Izadi, D. (2023). Editorial
introduction: Normativities of languaging from the Global South: The social media
discourse. Discourse, Context &
Media, 53, 100701.
Dovchin, S., & Shinjee, B. (2022). The
non-normativity of the Global South and the normativity of the Global North: The languaging as the normativity
of diversity. Discourse, Context &
Media, 48, 1–9.
Duek, S., & Nilsberth, M. (2022). Languages
and identity constructions in multilingual students’ digital literacy
practices. Education
Inquiry, 15(3), 295–311.
Finlay, S. M. (2020). Where
do you fit? Tokenistic, ally — or accomplice? [URL]
Fraenkel, J., Wallen, N., & Hyun, H. (2018). How
to design and evaluate research in education (10th
ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Hanna, B. E., & de Nooy, J. (2003). A
funny thing happened on the way to the forum: Electronic discussion and foreign language
learning. Language Learning &
Technology, 7(1), 71–85.
Harré, R., & Moghaddam, F. M. (Eds.). (2003). The
self and others: Positioning individuals and groups in personal, political, and cultural
contexts. Praeger.
Hewitt-Taylor, J. (2001). Use
of constant comparative analysis in qualitative research. Nursing
Standard, 15(42), 39–42.
Hohaia, D. (2017). Opening
the dialogue: Reflections of my PhD journey 2010–16. International Journal of
Learning in Social
Contexts, 22, 38–47.
Kenway, J., & Bullen, E. A. (2008). Dividing
delights: Children, adults and the search for
sales. In K. Drotner & S. Livingstone (Eds.), The
International handbook of children, media and
culture (pp. 168–82). Sage.
Kincheloe, J., & Steinberg, S. (2008). Indigenous knowledges in education: complexities, dangers, and profound benefits. In N. K. Denzin, Y. S. Lincoln, L. T. Smith (Eds.) Indigenous knowledges in education: Complexities, dangers, and profound benefits (pp. 135–156). SAGE Publications, Inc.,
Kozinets, R. V. (2020). Netnography:
The essential guide to qualitative social media
research. Sage.
Kral, I. (2011). Youth
media as cultural practice: Remote indigenous youth speaking out loud. Journal
of the Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander
Studies, 1, 4–16. [URL]
Kress, G., & Bezemer, J. (2023). Multimodal
discourse analysis. In G. Kress & J. Bezemer (Eds.), The
Routledge handbook of discourse
analysis, (pp. 139–155). Routledge.
Kubanyiova, M. (2008). Rethinking
research ethics in contemporary applied linguistics: The tension between macroethical and microethical
perspectives in situated research. The Modern Language
Journal, 92(4), 503–518.
Marino, F., Liska, D., & Kessler, M. (2024). Ethical
considerations for research involving computer-assisted language learning, social media, and online
environments. In P. I. De Costa, A. R. Ahmed, & C. Cinaglia (Eds.). Ethical
issues in applied linguistics
scholarship (pp. 72–86). John Benjamins.
Nie, Z., Waheed, M., Kasimon, D., & Wan Abas, W. A. B. (2023). The
role of social network analysis in social media research. Applied
Sciences, 13(17), 9486.
Oliver, R., & Exell, M. (2024). Instagram
and language use: A case study of a young Australian Aboriginal
artist. In S. Dovchin, R. Oliver, & L. Wei, (Eds.), Translingual
practices: Playfulness and
precariousness (pp. 123–140). Cambridge University Press.
Oliver, R., & Nguyen, B. (2017). Aboriginal
youth’s linguistic success: Translanguaging on Facebook. The Canadian Modern
Language Review/La Revue Canadienne des Langues
Vivantes, 73(4), 463–487.
Ortega, L. (2007). Online
interactions and L2 learning: Some ethical challenges for teachers and
researchers. Invited speech presented at the University
of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 30
March.
Papacharissi, Z. (Ed.). (2011). A
networked self: Identity, community, and culture on social network
sites. Routledge.
Qassrawi, R. M., & Al Karasneh, S. M. (2023). Benefits
of Facebook usage (as a Web 2.0 application) in foreign language instruction in higher education: A
meta-analysis study. Cogent Arts &
Humanities, 10(1).
Spilioti, T., & Tagg, C. (2017). The
ethics of online research methods in applied linguistics: Challenges, opportunities, and directions in ethical
decision-making, Applied Linguistics
Review, 8(2–3), 163–167.
Talmy, S. (2010). Qualitative
interviews in applied linguistics: From research instrument to social
practice. Annual Review of Applied
Linguistics, 30, 128–148.
