In:Digital and Internet-Based Research Methods in Applied Linguistics
Edited by Matt Kessler
[Research Methods in Applied Linguistics 15] 2026
► pp. 58–80
Chapter 4Netnography and digital ethnographic approaches
Published online: 5 January 2026
https://doi.org/10.1075/rmal.15.04dec
https://doi.org/10.1075/rmal.15.04dec
Abstract
The notion of what constitutes the language classroom has developed over time, to the point where
applied linguists have increasingly investigated the impact of out-of-class exposure on the traditional
bricks-and-mortar classroom. Of particular interest is the digital classroom, and traditional classroom ethnographies
have also made this digital migration. Building on these recent developments, in this chapter we discuss how
ethnographic tools have to be modified across digital spaces to better understand the complexities surrounding
evolving classroom cultures and other applied linguistics contexts. We draw on insights from one particular brand of
ethnography, netnography. Specifically, we describe the netnography research process, provide examples of
netnographies, and discuss ethical dilemmas that often emerge in netnographic research. The chapter closes with
suggestions for the future, in light of the growing influence of generative artificial intelligence on language
education and the need for research on underrepresented populations.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Frequently asked research questions
- 3.Implementation
- Data sources
- Investigative data
- Interactive data
- Immersive data
- Research process (step-by-step guide)
- Step 1: Defining the research purpose and question
- Step 2: Identifying the online community or platform
- Step 3: Collecting data
- Step 4: Analyzing data
- Step 5: Presenting data
- Data sources
- 4.Example studies
- Janes and Chen (2024)
- Yu and Xu (2024)
- Nguyen and Pham (2023)
- Chen et al. (2023)
- Wang et al. (2024)
- Discussion
- 5.Ethics and research integrity considerations
- Before the study
- During the study
- After the study
- 6.Challenges and issues
- Challenges in data collection
- Challenges in data analysis
- 7.Future research directions
- AI integration
- Emotional studies in digital contexts
- Underrepresented languages and populations
References
References (33)
Britzman, D. P. (2002). “The
question of belief”: Writing poststructural
ethnography. In E. A. St. Pierre & W. Pillow (Eds.), Working
the ruins: Feminist poststructural theory and methods in
education (pp. 33–46). Routledge.
Chen, J., Greenier, V., & Janes, S. (2023). A
netnography of emergent ESOL researcher identity and development in a virtual community of
practice. International Journal of Applied
Linguistics, 33(2), 275–291.
Consoli, S., & Ganassin, S. (Eds.). (2023). Reflexivity
in applied linguistics: Opportunities, challenges, and
suggestions. Routledge.
Darvin, R. (2023). Sociotechnical
structures, materialist semiotics, and online language learning. Language
Learning &
Technology, 27(2), 28–45. [URL].
De Costa, P. I., Ahmed, A., & Cinaglia, C. (Eds.). (2024). Ethical
issues in applied linguistics scholarship. John Benjamins.
De Costa, P. I., Kessler, M., & Gajasinghe, K. (2022). Ethnography. In S. Li, P. Hiver, & M. Papi (Eds.), The
Routledge handbook of second language acquisition and individual
differences (pp. 427–440). Routledge.
De Costa, P. I., Lee, J., Rawal, H., & Li, W. (2019). Ethics
in applied linguistics research. In J. McKinley & H. Rose (Eds.), The
Routledge handbook of research methods in applied
linguistics (pp. 122–130). Routledge.
Dizon, G. (2022). Informal
language learning through an online community: A netnography-based analysis of an L2 Japanese
subreddit. The Language
Teacher, 46(2), 9–16.
Duff, P. A. (2002). The
discursive co-construction of knowledge, identity, and difference: An ethnography of communication in the high
school mainstream. Applied
Linguistics, 23(3), 289–322.
Gambetti, R. C., & Kozinets, R. V. (2024). Rich,
intimate and immersive. In J. Budde, A. Wischmann, G. Rißler, & M. Meier-Sternberg (Eds), Novelty,
innovation and transformation in educational ethnographic
Research (pp. 29–45). Routledge.
Georgakopoulou, A. (2017). ‘Whose
context collapse?’: Ethical clashes in the study of language and social media in
context. Applied Linguistics
Review, 8(2–3), 169–189.
Ingold, T. (2014). That’s
enough about ethnography! HAU: Journal of Ethnographic
Theory, 4(1), 383–395.
Isbell, D. R. (2018). Online
informal language learning: Insights from a Korean learning community. Language
Learning &
Technology, 22(3), 82–102.
Janes, S., & Chen, J. (2024). Enacting
teacher emotion, agency, and professional identity: A netnography of a novice Chinese language teacher’s
crisis teaching. Australian Journal of Applied
Linguistics, 7(1), 1333.
Kessler, M., De Costa, P., Isbell, D. R., & Gajasinghe, K. (2021). Conducting
a netnography in second language acquisition research. Language
Learning, 71(4), 1122–1148.
Kessler, M., Marino, F., & Liska, D. (2023). Netnographic
research ethics in applied linguistics: A systematic review of data collection and reporting
practices. Research Methods in Applied
Linguistics, 2(3), 100082.
King, K. A. (2024). The
promises and perils of positionality statements. Annual Review of Applied
Linguistics, 44.
Kozinets, R. V. (2024). Researching AI chatbots, platforms and the metaverse: Understanding today’s netnography. In R. W. Belk & C. Otnes (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research methods in marketing (pp. 185–196). Edward Elgar Publishing.
Kozinets, R. V., Dolbec, P. Y., & Earley, A. (2014). Netnographic
analysis: Understanding culture through social media
data. In U. Flick (Ed.), The
Sage handbook of qualitative data
analysis (pp. 262–275). Sage.
Kozinets, R. V. & Gretzel, U. (2023). Qualitative
social media methods: Netnography in the age of
technocultures. In N. K. Denzin, Norman, K., Y. S. Lincoln, M. D. Giardina, & G. S. Cannella (Eds.), The
Sage handbook of qualitative research (6th
ed., pp. 403–419). Sage.
Kozinets, R. V., & Seraj-Aksit, M. (2024). Everyday
activism: An AI-assisted netnography of a digital consumer movement. Journal of
Marketing
Management, 40(3–4), 347–370.
Kubokawa, J. M., Day, A. E., & De Costa, P. I. (in
press). Ethnography, linguistic ethnography, and participant
observation. In C. A. Chapelle (Ed.), The
encyclopedia of applied linguistics (2nd
ed.). Wiley.
Kurikko, H., & Tuominen, P. (2012). Collective
value creation and empowerment in an online brand community: A netnographic study on LEGO
builders. Technology Innovation Management
Review, 2(6), 12–17.
National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical
and Behavioral Research. (1979). The Belmont
report. Retrieved on 22
September 2025 from [URL]
Nguyen, Q. N., & Pham, L. N. (2023). Trauma-informed
and inclusive assessment of productive skills in online emergency ELT classes: A netnography study of an
English language training center. In E. Meletiadou (Ed.), Advances
in educational technologies and instructional
design (pp. 297–318). IGI Global.
Rowe, L. W. (2022). Google
Translate and biliterate composing: Second-graders’ use of digital translation tools to support bilingual
writing. TESOL
Quarterly, 56(3), 883–906.
Tao, J., Shao, Q., & Gao, X. (2017). Ethics-related
practices in Internet-based applied linguistics research. Applied Linguistics
Review, 8(4), 321–353.
Wang, F., Wang, F., & Lin, Z. (2024). ‘There
are no restrictions on me’: A netnographic approach to amateur subtitling from the perspective of
translanguaging. International Journal of
Multilingualism, 1–19.
