In:Research Methods in Complex Dynamic Systems Theory Approaches to Second Language Development
Edited by Wander Lowie, Rosmawati and Vanessa De Wilde
[Research Methods in Applied Linguistics 14] 2025
► pp. 35–56
Chapter 3Dynamic Structural Equation Modeling in response to the generalizability
concern about CDST-inspired research
Published online: 11 September 2025
https://doi.org/10.1075/rmal.14.03ela
https://doi.org/10.1075/rmal.14.03ela
Abstract
This chapter introduces Dynamic Structural Equation
Modeling (DSEM) as a CDST-compatible method that bridges idiographic and
nomothetic approaches, thereby enhancing the generalizability of findings in
SLA research. It explores DSEM’s potential to tackle key challenges in
CDST-inspired studies, particularly regarding generalization. The chapter
begins by outlining CDST’s role in SLA, emphasizing the need for integrated
approaches and addressing critiques of generalization in CDST research. It
then provides a detailed explanation of DSEM, including its assumptions,
data requirements, intra-individual and inter-individual models, and key
parameters. Next, an empirical study illustrates DSEM’s application in SLA.
Finally, the chapter evaluates DSEM’s contributions to CDST-inspired SLA
research, acknowledges its limitations, and concludes with implications for
implementing DSEM in SLA, offering a comprehensive perspective on its role
in advancing L2 development research.
Article outline
- Introduction
- DSEM: A response to CDST’s approach to generalization
- Generalization in CDST-research
- DSEM aims and framework
- DSEM assumptions and data requirements
- DSEM models
- Model 1.Intra-Individual: A Time Series model
- Model 2.Inter-Individual level: Time series modeling and multilevel modeling
- Models 3 and 4.Adding latent variables to the inter-individual level: Time series modeling, multilevel modeling, and structural equation modeling
- Empirical study
- Model 1.Intra-Individual level — A Time Series model
- Models 2 and 3.Inter-Individual level — Time Series, Multilevel modeling, and Structural Equation modeling
- Affordances of DSEM in CDST research
- Implications for the implementation of DSEM in future studies
- Research ethics considerations
- Conclusion
References
References (28)
Al-Hoorie, A. H., Hiver, P., Larsen-Freeman, D., & Lowie, W. (2021). From
replication to substantiation: A Complexity Theory
perspective. Language
Teaching, 56(2), 276–291.
Asparouhov, T., Hamaker, E. L., & Muthén, B. (2017). Dynamic
Structural Equation
models. Structural Equation Modeling.
A Multidisciplinary
Journal, 25(3), 359–388.
Bialystok, E., & Viswanathan, M. (2009). Components of executive control with advantages for bilingual children in two cultures. Cognition, 112(3), 494–500.
Dörnyei, Z., Macintyre, P. D., & Henry, A. (2015). Motivational
dynamics in language
learning. Multilingual Matters.
Elahi Shirvan, M., & Taherian, T. (2018). Longitudinal
examination of university students’ foreign language enjoyment and
foreign language classroom anxiety in the course of general English:
Latent growth curve
modeling. International Journal of
Bilingual Education and
Bilingualism, 24(1), 31–49.
Elahi Shirvan, M., Taherian, T., Pawlak, M., & Kruk, M. (2024). The
dynamics of L2 teacher boredom and their link to creativity: A ban
or boon for boredom. International
Journal of Applied Linguistics.
Ernst, A. F., Timmerman, M. E., Jeronimus, B. F., & Albers, C. J. (2019). Insight
into individual differences in emotion dynamics with
clustering. Assessment, 28(4), 1186–1206.
Freeborn, L., Andringa, S., Lunansky, G., & Rispens, J. (2023). Network
analysis for modeling complex systems in SLA
research. Studies in Second Language
Acquisition, 45(2), 526–557.
Guillemin, M., & Gillam, L. (2004). Ethics,
reflexivity, and ethically important moments in
research. Qualitative
Inquiry, 10(2), 261–280.
Hamaker, E. L., Asparouhov, T., Brose, A., Schmiedek, F., & Muthén, B. (2018). At
the frontiers of modeling intensive longitudinal data: Dynamic
structural equation models for the affective measurements from the
COGITO Study. Multivariate Behavioral
Research, 53(6), 820–841.
Hamaker, E. L., Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2023). Dynamic
structural equation modeling as a combination of time series
modeling, multilevel modeling, and structural equation
modeling. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Handbook
of structural equation
modeling (pp. 576–596). The Guilford Press.
Hiver, P., & Al-Hoorie, A. H. (2020). Research
methods for Complexity Theory in Applied
Linguistics. Multilingual Matters.
Jongerling, J., Laurenceau, J., & Hamaker, E. L. (2015). A
multilevel AR(1) model: Allowing for inter-Individual differences in
trait-scores inertia, and innovation
variance. Multivariate Behavioral
Research, 50(3), 334–349.
Kruk, M., Pawlak, M., Taherian, T., Yüce, E., Elahi Shirvan, M., & Barabadi, E. (2023). When
time matters: Mechanisms of change in a mediational model of foreign
language playfulness and L2 learners’ emotions using latent change
score mediation model. Studies in
Second Language Learning and
Teaching, 13(1), 39–69.
Kubanyiova, M. (2008). Rethinking
research ethics in contemporary Applied Linguistics: The tension
between macroethical and microethical perspectives in situated
research. Modern Language
Journal, 92(4), 503–518.
Larsen-Freeman, D. (1997). Chaos/complexity
science and second language
acquisition. Applied
Linguistics, 18(2), 141–165.
Larsen-Freeman, D. & Cameron, L. (2008). Complex
systems and Applied
Linguistics. Oxford University Press.
Lowie, W. M., & Verspoor, M. H. (2019). Individual
differences and the ergodicity
problem. Language
Learning, 69(S1), 184–206.
McNeish, D. (2019). Two-level
dynamic structural equation models with small
samples. Structural Equation
Modeling. A Multidisciplinary
Journal, 26(6), 1–19.
Molenaar, P. C. M. (2004). A
manifesto on psychology as idiographic science: Bringing the person
back into scientific psychology, this time
forever. Measurement
Interdisciplinary Research and
Perspectives, 2(4), 201–218.
Pallotti, G. (2021). Cratylus’
silence: On the philosophy and methodology of Complex Dynamic
Systems Theory in SLA. Second
Language
Research, 38(3), 689–701.
Papi, M., & Hiver, P. (2020). Language
learning motivation as a complex dynamic system: A global
perspective of truth, control, and
value. Modern Language
Journal, 104(1), 209–232.
Schultzberg, M., & Muthén, B. (2017). Number
of subjects and time points needed for multilevel time-series
analysis: A simulation study of dynamic structural equation
modeling. Structural Equation
Modeling. A Multidisciplinary
Journal, 25(4), 495–515.
Taherian, T., Elahi Shirvan, M., Yazdanmehr, E., Kruk, M., & Pawlak, M. (2023). A
longitudinal analysis of informal digital learning of English,
willingness to communicate and foreign language boredom: A latent
change score mediation model. The
Asia-Pacific Education
Researcher, 33, 997–1010.
Van Dijk, M., Lowie, W., Smit, N., Verspoor, M., & van Geert, P. (2024). Complex
Dynamic Systems Theory as a foundation for process-oriented research
on second language
development. Second Language
Research.
Van Geert, P. (1991). A dynamic systems model of cognitive and language growth. Psychological review, 98(1), 3–53. HYPERLINK “[URL]”
