In:Child-centered Approaches to Applied Linguistic Research
Edited by Yuko Goto Butler and Annamaria Pinter
[Research Methods in Applied Linguistics 13] 2025
► pp. 186–199
Chapter 11Conclusion and the way forward
Published online: 5 September 2025
https://doi.org/10.1075/rmal.13.11but
https://doi.org/10.1075/rmal.13.11but
Abstract
Child-centeredness can be interpreted in multiple ways. It may be easier to understand its core ideas but putting
them into practice can be challenging. Child-centeredness is context-dependent and is constantly changing due to environmental
changes such as the advancement of technology. Cultural and societal perceptions towards children may change as well. The
authors in this volume addressed challenges as well as possibilities when implementing child-centered research in their
respective research contexts. As the conclusion of this volume, this chapter summarizes such concerns and unresolved
challenges focusing on four major ethical-related themes. They are: (1) protecting children’s rights and respecting them as
social actors; (2) making sure that children are ready to consent; (3) making children the primary beneficiaries; and (4)
contextualizing research in the whole life of children and creating democratic partnerships. Although there are no easy
remedies for overcoming the difficulties when conducting child-centered research, researchers’ awareness of child-centeredness
and constant reflections on their research practice are key to advancing Applied Linguistics and making the research more
child-centered.
Article outline
- Introduction
- Theme 1: How to protect children’s rights and respect them as social actors
- Theme 2: How to make sure that children are ready to consent
- Theme 3: Whose research is it for?: How to make children
the primary beneficiaries - Theme 4: How to contextualize research in the whole life of children and create democratic partnerships
- Implications and suggestions
- Be reflective
- Be aware of children’s heterogeneity
- Conclusion
Notes References
References (11)
Alderson, P., & Morrow, V. (2011). The
ethics of research with children and young people: A practical
handbook. Sage.
Al-Hoorie, A. H., Cinaglia, C., Hiver, P., Huensch, Am., Isbell, D. R., Leung, C., & Sudina, E. (2024). Open
science: Considerations and issues for TESOL research. TESOL
Quarterly, 58(1), 537–556.
Ellis, R., & Shintani, N. (2014). Exploring
Language pedagogy through second language acquisition
research. Routledge.
Guillemin, M., & Gillam, L. (2004). Ethics,
reflectivity, and “ethically important moments: in research. Qualitative
Inquiry, 10(2), 261–280.
Kolbe, V. (2022). Open
science versus data protection — Challenges and solutions in sign language acquisition
studies. Hrvatska Revija za Rehabilitacijska Istra
zivanja, 58, 109–120.
Ober, R., Dovchin, S., & Oliver, R. (2024). “Where
you from, who’s your Mob?”: Ethical considerations when undertaking Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander
applied linguistic research. In P. I. De Costa, A. Rabie-Ahmed & C. Cinaglia (Eds.), Ethical
issues in applied linguistics
scholarship (pp. 192–209). John Benjamins.
Oliver, R., & Azkarai, A. (2017). Review
of child second language acquisition (SLA): Examining theories and research. Annual
Review of Applied
Linguistics, 37, 62–76.
Perry, K. H., & Mallozzi, C. A. (2015). “Who
gets to say?” Political and ethical dilemmas for researchers in educational
linguistics. In M. Bigelow & J. Ennser-Kananen (Eds.), Routledge
handbook of educational
linguistics (pp. 397–413). Routledge.
Pinter, A. (2022). Child-centred
ethics in second language education: Navigating the ‘ethical maze’ when working with children participants in
research. Language Teaching for Young
Learners, 4(1), 4–29.
