In:Child-centered Approaches to Applied Linguistic Research
Edited by Yuko Goto Butler and Annamaria Pinter
[Research Methods in Applied Linguistics 13] 2025
► pp. 114–130
Chapter 7Ethics and child-centered research in the era of digital technology
Published online: 5 September 2025
https://doi.org/10.1075/rmal.13.07but
https://doi.org/10.1075/rmal.13.07but
Abstract
We are living in a time of rapid change. Digital technology has transformed not only how we communicate but also the
target language itself. Digital technology also influences how we conduct child-centered research. Drawing on the author’s and
other scholars’ Applied Linguistics research concerning child participants, the chapter discusses some ethical issues that
emerge when digital technologies are used in child-centered research. The chapter first lays out basic, internationally
accepted ethical principles for human subject research — respect for person (autonomy), beneficence (benefits should be
greater than potential risk), and justice (equal and fair treatment) — and their implications when working with children.
Building on these ethical principles, the chapter discusses (a) the challenges of ensuring children’s autonomy in the process
of obtaining their assent through digital technologies (e.g., online surveys) and throughout the research process; (b)
complexities in assessing potential benefits and risks related to protecting children’s confidentiality and privacy in digital
spaces; and (c) challenges in power relations between children and adult researchers as well as among children, which may
influence research procedures, experiences, and outcomes. The chapter concludes with suggestions for researchers when
designing and conducting child-centered research in the rapidly changing world of digital technology.
Article outline
- Introduction
- Basic ethical principles: Implications for child-centered research perspectives
- Complexities in conducting child-centered research
in the era of digital technology - Respecting children’s autonomy in the assent procedure
- Ensuring benefits and avoiding harms during research participation
- Considering fairness and power imbalances in child research
in the digital era - Conclusion
Notes References
References (30)
Antle, A. N. (2020). The
ethics of doing research with vulnerable
populations. Interactions, 24(6), 74–77.
Butler, Y. G. (2022a). Language
education in the era of digital technology. JALT
Journal, 44(1), 137–152.
(2022b). Researching
with children as an opportunity for active and interactive learning: Lessons from a digital game design
project. In K Kuchah & A. Pinter (Eds.), Ethical
and methodological issues in researching young language learners in school
context (pp. 27–47). Multilingual Matters.
(2025). Children’s
additional language learning in instructional settings: Implications for teaching and future
research. Multilingual Matters.
Clemente-Suárez, V. J., Beltrán-Velasco, A. I., Herrero-Roldán, S., Rodriguez-Besteiro, S., Martínez-Guardado, I., Martín-Rodríguez, A., & Tornero-Aguilera, J. F. (2024). Digital
device usage and childhood cognitive development: Exploring effects on cognitive
abilities. Children, 11, 1299.
Cook, T., & Hess, E. (2007). What
the camera sees and from whose perspective: Fun methodologies for engaging children in enlightening
adults. Childhood, 14(1), 29–45.
Cutting, K., & Peacock, S. (2021). Making
sense of ‘slippages’: Re-evaluating ethics for digital research with children and young
people. Children’s Geographies.
Flewitt, R. (2005). Conducting
research with young children: Some ethical considerations. Early Child Development and
Care, 175(6), 553–565.
Guillemin, M., & Gillam, L. (2004). Ethics,
reflexivity, and “ethically important moments” in research. Qualitative
Inquiry, 10(2), 261–280.
Jain, R., & Jain, A. (2024). Generative
AI in writing research papers: A new type of algorithmic bias and uncertainty in scholarly
work. In K. Arai (Ed.), Intelligent
Systems and Applications. IntelliSys 2024. Lecture Notes in Networks and
Systems. Springer.
James, N., & Busher, H. (2015). Ethical
issues in online research. Educational Research and
Evaluation, 21(2), 89–94,
Jin, K-Y., Reichert, F., Cagasan Jr., L. P., de la Torre, J., & Law, N. (2020). Measuring
digital literacy across three age cohorts: Exploring test dimensionality and performance
differences. Computers & Education.
Kolbe, V. (2022). Open
science versus data protection — Challenges and solutions in sign language acquisition
studies. Hrvatska Revija za Rehabilitacijska Istra
zivanja, 58(Special
Issue), 109–120.
Kravchenko, A. V. (2021). Information
technologies, literacy, and cognitive development: An ecolinguistics view. Language
Sciences, 84.
Kuchah, K., & Pinter, A. (2021). Researching
young language learners in school contexts: Setting the
scene. In K Kuchah & A. Pinter (Eds.), Ethical
and methodological issues in researching young language learners in school
context (pp. 1–23). Multilingual Matters.
Landoni, M., Huibers, T., Murgia, E., & Pera, M. S. (2022). Ethical
implications for children’s use of search tools in an educational
setting. International Journal of Child-Computer
Interaction, 32, 100386
National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and
Behavioral Research (1979). The Belmont Report: Ethical principles and
guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. [URL]
Ortega, L., & Zyzik, E. (2008). Online
interactions and L2 learning: Some ethical challenges for L2
researchers. In S. Magnan Pierce (Ed.), Mediating discourse
online (pp. 331–355). John Benjamins.
Peters, M. A., White, E. J., Besley, T., Locke, K, Redder, B., Novak, R., Gibbons, A., O’Neill, J., Tesar, M., Sturm, S. (2021). Video
ethics in educational research involving children; Literature review and critical
discussion. Educational Philosophy and
Theory, 53(9), 863–880.
Pinter, A., Butler, Y. G., Sherwin, H., Tabali, P., Mathew, R., & Peng, X. (2024). Language
learning ‘in the wild’: Children playing online games in English. British Council.
Rotgans, J. I., & Schmidt, H. G. (2010). The
role of teachers in facilitating situational interest in an active-learning
classroom. Teaching and Teacher
Education, 27(1), 37–42.
Small, G. W., Lee, J., Kaufman, A., Jalil, J., Siddarth, P., Gaddipati, H., Moody, T. D., & Bookheimer, S. Y. (2020). Brain
health consequences of digital technology use. Dialogues in Clinical
Neuroscience, 22(2), 179–187.
Thomas, N. (2017). Turning
the tables: Children as researchers. In P. Christensen & A. James (Eds.), Research
with children: Perspectives and practices (3rd
ed., pp. 160–179). Routledge.
UNICEF. (2019). Digital literacy
for children” 10 things you need to know. [URL]
. (2021). Policy guidance on
AI for children. [URL]
Van Mechelen, M., Baykal, G. E., Kindler, C., Driksson, E., & Iversen, O. S. (2020). Proceeding
of the 2020 Interaction Design and Children
Conference (pp. 161–183).
Waller, T., & Bitou, A. (2011). Research
with children: Three challenges for participatory research in early
childhood. European Early Childhood Education Research
Journal, 19(1), 5–20,
Yee, C. M. (2023,
May 23). Taiwan brings in generative AI to help students learn English. Microsoft Source
Asia. [URL]
