Cover not available

In:Innovative Qualitative Methodologies in Multilingual Literacy Development Research: Amplifying voices from immigrant, transnational, and refugee communities
Edited by Amanda K. Kibler and Fares J. Karam
[Research Methods in Applied Linguistics 11] 2025
► pp. 206–231

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Chapter 11
Exploring the ‘void’ of silent/ced knowledge and expertise of multilingual learners

 | University of California, Santa Barbara
 | University of California, Santa Barbara
 | University of California, Santa Barbara
 | University of California, Santa Barbara
Published online: 7 April 2025
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/rmal.11.11ary
Abstract
Grounded in a new sociolinguistic, literacy-centered theory — dialogic void — as a way of exploring silences in educational spaces, we explored the expressed cultural, linguistic, and experiential knowledge of 63 multilingual (Spanish/English) elementary students and the contextual factors (e.g., scaffolded questioning from discussion facilitators) that may impact how much knowledge and expertise multilingual students share. Findings show how the questions and methodological decisions literacy scholars make, and the ways findings about multilingual learners in English-dominant classroom contexts are represented can illuminate otherwise hidden knowledge and expertise. We highlight how this methodological innovation may be helpful to qualitative literacy researchers in more deeply exploring their positionality and ways that disciplinary, cultural, linguistic, and professional identities can shape (and potentially obscure) observations.
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • A study of reading discussions with multilingual elementary students
    • Context and participants
    • Data sources
    • Analytic framework
    • Exploring the void
    • Positionality
    • Exploring contextual conditions
    • Findings
      • Instances of relevant discursive qualities
  • Methodological discussion
    • Positionality and the dialogic void
    • Positioning young co-learners as knowledgeable others
    • Researching moments of silence
    • Positionality and graphical (re)presentations
    • Positionality and exploration within social space
  • Implications
  • Notes
  • References
References (36)
References
Arya, D. J. (2022). Into the void of discourse. Linguistics and Education, 68, 100964. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Arya, D. J., Clairmont, A., & Hirsch, S. (2020). Interpreting and explaining data representations: A comparison across grades 1–7. In T. Phillips & R. Dippre (Eds.), Approaches to lifespan writing research: Generating murmurations towards an actionable coherence (pp. 177–193). Colorado State University Press & the University Press of Colorado. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Arya, D. J., Harlow, D., Hansen, A. K., Harmon, L., McBeath, J., & Pulgar, J. (2017). Innovative youth: An engineering and literacy integrated approach. Science Scope, 40(9), 82–88. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Arya, D. J., & Maul, A. (2016). The building of knowledge, language, and decision-making about climate change science: a cross-national program for secondary students. International Journal of Science Education, 38(6), 885–904. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2021). Why sociocultural context matters in the science of reading and the reading of science: Revisiting the science discovery narrative. Reading Research Quarterly, 56(S1), S273–S286. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Arya, D. J., Pihen González, E., Christman, D., Ozgen, D., Cano, J., Muller, A., Shackley, M., Meier, V., & Mottus, R. ((in press). Rising with the tides of change through community based literacies. In M. Mahmood, J. Cano, & M. Orellano Faulstich (Eds.), University- University-community partnerships for transformative education: Sowing seeds of resistance and renewal. Palgrave Macmillan.
Arya, D. J., Sultana, S., Galisky, J., & Katz, D. ((in press). The Critical Reading Assessment. Xóchitl Justice Press.
Arya, D. J., Sultana, S., Levine, S., Katz, D., Galisky, J., & Karimi, H. (2022). Raising critical readers in the 21st century: A case of assessing fourth-grade reading abilities and practices. Literacy Research: Theory, Method, and Practice, 71(1), 418–436. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Birt, L., Scott, S., Cavers, D., Campbell, C., & Walter, F. (2016). Member checking: A tool to enhance trustworthiness or merely a nod to validation? Qualitative Health Research, 26(13), 1802–1811. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bloome, D., Carter, S. P., Christian, B. M., Otto, S., & Shuart-Faris, N. (2004). Discourse analysis and the study of classroom language and literacy events: A microethnographic perspective. Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cano, J., McBeath, J., Pulgar, J., Arya, D. J., & Durán, R. (2021). Narrativas digitales para fomentar el interés en el aprendizaje de ciencias [Digital storytelling to foster interest in STEM learning]. In C. Ricardo Barreto, M. Borjas, J. Cano Barrios, & C. Astorga (Eds.), Ambientes de aprendizaje mediados por TIC en educación infantil (pp. 113–136). Editorial Universidad del Norte.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cazden, C. B., & Beck, S. W. (2003). Classroom discourse. In A. C. Graesser, M. A. Gernsbacher, & S. R. Goldman (Eds.), Handbook of discourse processes (pp. 165–197). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Conover, E. (2016, November 13). ‘Void’ dives into physics of nothingness. Science News. Retrieved on 18 November 2024 from [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Council of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO). (2023). English language proficiency development (ELPD) framework. Common Core State Standards. Retrieved on 18 November 2024 from [URL]
Fairclough, N. (2001). Critical discourse analysis as a method in social scientific research. Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, 5(11), 121–138.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Flewitt, R. (2008). Multimodal literacies. In J. Marsh & E. Hallet (Eds.), Desirable literacies: Approaches to language and literacy in the early years (pp. 122–139). Sage. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frankfurt, H. G. (1958). Peirce’s notion of abduction. Journal of Philosophy, 55(14), 593–597. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harris, S., Meier, V., & Arya, D. J. (2024). Reconstructing the academic in academic language: Radically listening to hidden worlds of knowledge building. In A. Tomlin & O. Silverman Andrews (Eds.), When we hear them: Attuning teachers to language diverse students (pp. 57–72). Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hikida, M. (2018). Holding space for literate identity co-construction. Journal of Literacy Research, 50(2), 217–238. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holmes, A. G. D. (2020). Researcher positionality: A consideration of its influence and place in qualitative research: A new researcher guide. Shanlax International Journal of Education, 8(4), 1–10. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Karimi, K., Sañosa, D. J., Hernandez Rios, K., Tran, P., Chun, D. M., Wang, R., & Arya, D. J. (2023). Building a city in the sky: Multiliteracies in immersive virtual reality. CALICO Journal, 40(1), 24–44. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lin, A. M. (2015). Researcher positionality. In F. M. Hult, & D. C. Johnson (Eds.), Research methods in language policy and planning: A practical guide (pp. 21–32). Wiley Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Manohar, N., Liamputtong, P., Bhole, S., Arora, A. (2019). Researcher positionality in cross-cultural and sensitive research. In P. Liamputtong (Ed.), Handbook of research methods in health social sciences (pp. 1601–1616). Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mazzei, L. A. (2004). Silent listenings: Deconstructive practices in discourse-based research. Educational Researcher, 33(2), 26–34. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moll, L. C. (2019). Elaborating funds of knowledge: Community-oriented practices in international contexts. Literacy Research: Theory, Method, and Practice, 68(1), 130–138. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moll, L. C., Amanti, C., Neff, D., & Gonzalez, N. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory into Practice, 31(2), 132–141. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Morita, N. (2012). Identity: The situated construction of identity and positionality in multilingual classrooms. In S. Mercer, S. Ryan, & M. Williams (Eds.), Psychology for language learning: Insights from research, theory and practice (pp. 26–41). Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nation, J., Harlow, D., Arya, D. J., & Longtin, M. (2019). From becoming to being scientists: Developing STEM programming for girls using design-based implementation research approaches. Afterschool Matters, 29, 36–44.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Serafini, F. (2015). Multimodal literacy: From theories to practices. Language Arts, 92(6), 412–423. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Simandan, D. (2019). Revisiting positionality and the thesis of situated knowledge. Dialogues in Human Geography, 9(2), 129–149. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Steele, C. M., & Aronson, J. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(5), 797–811. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tuck, E. (2009). Suspending damage: A letter to communities. Harvard Educational Review, 79(3), 409–428. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tuck, E., & Yang, K. W. (2014). Unbecoming claims: Pedagogies of refusal in qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 20(6), 811–818. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
U.S. Census Bureau. (2022). U.S. Census Bureau: 2020 Census Results. Retrieved on 18 November 2024 from [URL]
Weatherall, J. O. (2016). Void: The strange physics of nothing. Yale University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wodak, R. (1999). Critical discourse analysis at the end of the 20th century. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 32(1–2), 185–193. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue