In:Innovative Qualitative Methodologies in Multilingual Literacy Development Research: Amplifying voices from immigrant, transnational, and refugee communities
Edited by Amanda K. Kibler and Fares J. Karam
[Research Methods in Applied Linguistics 11] 2025
► pp. 125–148
Chapter 7Bridging language and STEM
Using an Anzalduan framework to center Latinx Elementary and Middle School students’ understanding of robotics
Published online: 7 April 2025
https://doi.org/10.1075/rmal.11.07sal
https://doi.org/10.1075/rmal.11.07sal
Abstract
This chapter illustrates how combining an Anzalduan framework with critical ethnography and social semiotics
provides a unique approach centering Latinx students’ STEM knowledge, language, and literacy use as legitimate ways of
conocimiento and communicating. Using longitudinal data, authors examine how Latinx middle-grade
students use their linguistic repertoires through multimodal representations to bridge their understanding of a
real-world STEM FIRST LEGO League (FLL) challenge and their community, conceptualized through Anzaldúa’s (Moraga & Anzaldúa, 1983) work on mestizaje and imagery of
the mestiza body as a bridge. The chapter further documents how to rethink Anzalduan theory through
overlaying Deleuze and Guattari’s (1980/1987) characteristics of a
minor literature as an additional lens to deterritorialize language and promote equitable
research centering Latinx ways of languaging, knowing, and being.
Keywords: Anzalduan Theory, robotics, STEM, multilingual learners, thinking with theory
Article outline
- Introduction
- Overview of the study and its findings
- Traditional and critical ethnography in education
- Multimodal literacies
- Aims of the study
- Research context and participants
- Findings
- The mestiza(o) body as a bridge
- Bridging identity, language, and lived experiences
- Bridging farm workers toil to fork through multilingual and multimodal literacy practices
- Methodological discussion: Rethinking theory for more equitable research
- Our mestizaje
- Thinking with theory
- Deterritorializing language through enacting the brown body as bridge
- Deterritorializing language through multimodal literacies
- Deterritorializing language through translanguaging
- Political immediacy and collective assemblage
- Connecting to Nepantla
- Implications for qualitative research on multilingual literacy development
- Thoughts on ethical reflexivity
- Reconceptualizing qualitative research
References
References (42)
Anzaldúa, G. (1987/1999). Borderlands/La
frontera: The new mestiza (5th ed.). Aunt Lute Foundation Books.
(1990). Making
face, making soul: Haciendo caras: Creative and critical perspectives by feminists of
color (1st ed.). Aunt Lute Foundation Books.
(1993). Chicana
artists: Exploring nepantla, el lugar de la frontera. NACLA Report on the
Americas, 27(1), 37–45.
(2002). Preface:
(Un)natural bridges, (un)safe spaces. In G. Anzaldúa, & A. Keating (Eds.), This
bridge we call home: Radical visions for
transformation (pp. 1–5) Routledge.
Anzaldúa, G., & Keating, A. (2002). This
bridge we call home: Radical visions for
transformation. Routledge.
Beltran, C. (2004). Patrolling
borders: Hybrids, hierarchies and the challenge of mestizaje. Political
Research
Quarterly, 57(4), 595–607.
Bloome, D., & Green, J. (2018). Ethnography. In B. Frey (Ed.), The
Sage encyclopedia of educational research, measurement, and
evaluation (pp. 618–623). Sage.
Bogue, R (2011). The
minor. In C. Stivale (Ed.), Gilles
Deleuze: Key
concepts (pp. 131–141). Routledge.
Burke, A., Okrent, A., & Hale, K. (2022). The
state of U.S. science and engineering 2022: Executive summary. National Science Board. Retrieved on 17 November 2024 from [URL]
Calderón, D., Bernal, D. D., Huber, L. P., Malagón, M. C., & Vélez, V. N. (2012). A
chicana feminist epistemology revisited: Cultivating ideas a generation
later. Harvard Educational
Review, 82(4), 513–539.
Center for the Advancement of Informal Science Education
(CAISE). (2018). Broadening participation task force: February
2018 update. Retrieved on 17 November 2024 from [URL]
Change the
Equation (2017). Ending the double disadvantage: Ensuring STEM
opportunities in our poorest schools. Retrieved on 17 November 2024
from [URL]
Ciechanowski, K., Bottoms, S., Fonseca, A. L., & St. Clair, T. (2015). Should
Rey Mysterio drink gatorade? Cultural competence in afterschool STEM
programming. Afterschool
Matters, 21, 29–37.
Creswell, J., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative
inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th
ed.). Sage.
Deleuze, G. & Guattari, F. (1987). A
thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. University of Minnesota Press. [Originally published as Mille plateaux: Capitalisme et
schizophrénie
II. Paris: Minuit, 1980.]
Delgado Bernal, D. (1998). Using
a Chicana feminist epistemology in educational research. Harvard Educational
Review, 68(4), 555–582.
Djonko-Moore, C. M., Leonard, J., Holifield, Q., Bailey, E. B., & Almughyirah, S. M. (2017). Using
culturally relevant experiential education to enhance urban children’s knowledge and engagement in
science. Journal of Experiential
Education, 41(2), 137–153.
Fitzpatrick, K., & May, S. (2022). Critical
ethnography and education: Theory, methodology, and
ethics. Routledge.
García, O., & Li, W. (2014). Translanguaging:
Language, bilingualism and education. Palgrave Macmillan.
Garza, N. E., Rodriguez, S. L., & Espino, M. L. (2023). Nepantla
aquí, Nepantla allá: The borderlands of identity from Mexican-origin women in
STEM. Journal of Hispanic Higher
Education, 22(2), 130–145.
Hurtado, A. (2020). Intersectional
Chicana feminisms: Sitios y lenguas. The University of Arizona Press.
Kress, G. (2000). Design
and transformation: New theories of meaning. In B. Cope, & M. Kalantzis (Eds.), Multiliteracies:
Literacy learning and the design of social
futures (pp. 153–161). Routledge.
Lather, P. A. (2007). Getting
lost: Feminist efforts toward a double(d) science. State University of New York Press.
May, S. (2023). Critical
ethnography, language, race/ism and inequity in education: Charting the
field. In S. May & B. Caldas (Eds.), Critical
ethnography, language, race/ism and
education (pp. 31–52). Multilingual Matters.
Mazzei. (2017). Following the contour of concepts
toward a minor inquiry. Qualitative
Inquiry, 23(9), 675–685.
Mazzei, L. A. (2021). Postqualitative
inquiry: Or the necessity of theory. Qualitative
Inquiry, 27(2), 198–200.
McGee, E. O., & Robinson, W. H. (2020). Diversifying
STEM: Multidisciplinary perspectives on race and gender. Rutgers University Press.
McWhirter, E. H., & Cinamon, R. G. (2021). Old
problem, new perspectives: Applying Anzaldúan concepts to underrepresentation in
STEM. Journal of Career
Development, 48(6), 877–892.
Mikhaeli, C. A., & Baskerville, R. L. (2019). Using
semiotics to analyze representational complexity in social media. Information
and
Organization, 29, 1–19.
Moraga, & Anzaldúa, G. (1983). This
bridge called my back: Writings by radical women of color (2nd
ed.). Kitchen Table: Women of Color Press.
Morrison, T. (1993,
December 7). Nobel lecture. Retrieved on 17 November 2024
from [URL]
Palmer, D., & Caldas, B. (2016). Critical
ethnography. In K. King, Y. Lai, & S. May (Eds.), Research
methods in language and
education (pp. 1–12). Springer.
Pérez-Torres, R. (2006). Mestizaje:
Critical uses of race in Chicano culture. University of Minnesota Press.
St. Pierre, E. S. (2014). A
brief and personal history of post qualitative research: Toward “post
inquiry.” Journal of Curriculum
Theorizing, 30(2), 2–19.
Street, B. V. (1995). Social
literacies: Critical approaches to literacy in development, ethnography, and
education. Longman.
