In:Innovative Qualitative Methodologies in Multilingual Literacy Development Research: Amplifying voices from immigrant, transnational, and refugee communities
Edited by Amanda K. Kibler and Fares J. Karam
[Research Methods in Applied Linguistics 11] 2025
► pp. 45–66
Chapter 3An ethnetnography of (non)belonging
The transliterate practices of a Muslim refugee-background mother
Published online: 7 April 2025
https://doi.org/10.1075/rmal.11.03kar
https://doi.org/10.1075/rmal.11.03kar
Abstract
This chapter aims at presenting ethnetnography as an innovative qualitative methodology for studying
multilingual literacy practices in Applied Linguistics. An ethnetnography combines elements of a traditional
ethnography with a netnography (focusing on participants’ online interactions). To showcase how to conduct an
ethnetnography, we draw upon a study that traces how a Muslim refugee-background participant negotiates (non)belonging
within the resettlement context of the United States. We share how to collect, analyze, and present the data and
reflect on the rewards and challenges of adopting ethnetnographic methods. Methodological implications are presented
on how an ethnetnographic approach can provide for a more complete, equitable, and ethical examination of the
literacies of refugee-background individuals on the move.
Keywords: ethnetnography, ethnography, netnography, transliteracies, resonance, ambivalence, refugee, multilingual
Article outline
- Introduction
- Overview of the study and its findings
- Context and focal participant
- Theoretical frame
- Relevant literature
- Findings
- Methodological discussion: Rethinking data for more equitable research
- Netnographies in second language acquisition research
- Ethnetnography: Towards a definition
- Researcher positionality, recruitment, and ethical considerations
- Ethnetnographic data collection operations
- Ethnetnographic data analysis
- Rewards, challenges, and limitations
- Implications for qualitative research on multilingual literacy development
References
References (38)
Bartlett, L., Mendenhall, M., & Ghaffar-Kucher, A. (2017). Culture
in acculturation: Refugee youth’s schooling experiences in international schools in New York
City. International Journal of Intercultural
Relations, 60, 109–119.
Cinaglia, C., Rabie-Ahmed, A., & De Costa, P. I. (2024). Introduction:
Ethical issues in applied linguistics
scholarship. In P. I. De Costa, A. Rabie-Ahmed, & C. Cinaglia (Eds.), Ethical
issues in applied linguistics
scholarship (pp. 1–7). John Benjamins.
De Costa, P. I. (2010). From
refugee to transformer: A Bourdieusian take on a Hmong learner’s
trajectory. TESOL
Quarterly, 44(3), 517–541.
Dovchin, S. (2015). Language,
multiple authenticities and social media: The online language practices of university students in
Mongolia. Journal of
Sociolinguistics, 19(4), 437–459.
Duran, C. S. (2019). On
issues of discrimination and xenophobia: What can TESOL practitioners do to support and advocate for refugee
students? TESOL
Quarterly, 53(3), 818–827.
Fereday, J., & Muir-Cochrane, E. (2006). Demonstrating
rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of coding. International
Journal of Qualitative
Methods, 5(1), 80–92.
Isbell, D. R. (2018). Online
informal language learning: Insights from a Korean learning community. Language
Learning &
Technology, 22(3), 82–102.
Karam, F. J. (2018). Language
and identity construction: The case of a refugee digital bricoleur. Journal of
Adolescent & Adult
Literacy, 61(5), 511–521.
(2021). Writing
the story of Sabadullah: Transnational literacies of two refugee-background
parents. In D. Warriner (Ed.), Refugee
education across the
lifespan (pp. 231–250). Springer.
Karam, F. J., Barone, D., & Kibler, A. K. (2021). Resisting
and negotiating literacy tasks: Agentive practices of refugee-background
students. Research in the Teaching of
English, 55(4), 369–392.
Karam, F. J., Oikonomidoy, E., & Kibler, A. K. (2021). Artifactual
literacies and TESOL: Narratives of a Syrian refugee-background family. TESOL
Quarterly, 55(2), 510–535.
Kessler, M. (2023). Written
corrective feedback in an online community: A typology of English language learners’ requests and
interlocutors’ responses. Computers and
Composition, 67.
Kessler, M., Marino, F., & Liska, D. (2023). Netnographic
research ethics in applied linguistics: A systematic review of data collection and reporting
practices. Research Methods in Applied
Linguistics, 2(3), Article
100082.
Kessler, M., De Costa, P. I., Isbell, D., & Gajasinghe, K. (2021). Conducting
a netnography in second language acquisition research. Language
Learning, 71(4), 1122–1148.
Kulavuz-Onal, D. (2013). English
language teachers’ learning to teach with technology through participation in an online community of practice:
A netnography of webheads in action (Unpublished doctoral
dissertation). University of South Florida.
Lorimer Leonard, R. (2013). Traveling
literacies: Multilingual writing on the move. Research in the Teaching of
English, 48, 13–39.
Marino, F., Liska, D., & Kessler, M. (2024). Ethical
considerations for research involving computer-assisted language learning, social media, and online
environments. In P. I. De Costa, A. Rabie-Ahmed, & C. Cinaglia (Eds.), Ethical
issues in applied linguistics
scholarship (pp. 73–87). John Benjamins.
McBrien, J. L. (2005). Educational
needs and barriers for refugee students in the United States: A review of the
literature. Review of Educational
Research, 75(3), 329–364.
McBrien, J., Dooley, K., & Birman, D. (2017). Cultural
and academic adjustment of refugee youth: Introduction to the special
issue. International Journal of Intercultural
Relations, 60, 104–108.
Milani, T. M., & Levon, E. (2019). Israel
as homotopia: Language, space, and vicious belonging. Language in
Society, 48(4), 607–628.
Moriarty, M. (2019). Regimes
of voice and visibility in the refugeescape: A semiotic landscape
approach. Linguistic
Landscape, 5(2), 142–159.
Neuschafer, T. (2022). A
netnographic analysis of how Duolingo supports German and Spanish learning
needs. Digital Culture &
Education, 14(3), 1–15.
Omerbašić, D. (2015). Literacy
as a translocal practice: Digital multimodal literacy practices among girls resettled as
refugees. Journal of Adolescent & Adult
Literacy, 58(6), 472–481.
Portes, A., & Rumbaut, R. G. (2001). Legacies:
The story of the immigrant second generation. University of California Press.
Shapiro, S., & MacDonald, M. T. (2017). From
deficit to asset: Locating discursive resistance in a refugee-background student’s
narrative. Language, Identity &
Education, 16(2), 80–93.
Shapiro, S., Farrelly, R., & Curry, M. J. (Eds.). (2018). Educating
refugee-background students: Critical issues and dynamic
contexts. Multilingual Matters.
Stornaiuolo, A., Smith, A., & Phillips, N. C. (2017). Developing
a transliteracies framework for a connected world. Journal of Literacy
Research, 49(1), 68–91.
Tazreiter, C. (2019). Temporary
migrants as an uneasy presence in immigrant societies: Reflections on ambivalence in
Australia. International Journal of Comparative
Sociology, 60(1–2), 91–109.
Thomas, S., Joseph, C., Laccetti, J., Mason, B., Mills, S., Perril, S., & Pullinger, K. (2007). Transliteracy:
Crossing divides. First
Monday, 12(12).
UNHCR. (2021, June
18). Figures at a
glance. UNHCR. [URL]
University of Colorado Boulder, Institute of Behavioral
Science. (2020, October 9). The Wall: American Nativism,
Immigration Policy, and the Great Exclusion of 2017–2020; Ruben G. Rumbaut.
[Video]. YouTube. [URL]
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
