In:Innovative Qualitative Methodologies in Multilingual Literacy Development Research: Amplifying voices from immigrant, transnational, and refugee communities
Edited by Amanda K. Kibler and Fares J. Karam
[Research Methods in Applied Linguistics 11] 2025
► pp. 24–44
Chapter 2Rethinking qualitative meta-syntheses in literacy studies
Critical questions
Published online: 7 April 2025
https://doi.org/10.1075/rmal.11.02bro
https://doi.org/10.1075/rmal.11.02bro
Abstract
This chapter presents a critical examination of qualitative meta-synthesis in literacy research, emphasizing
its role in amplifying student voices and uncovering overlooked aspects of educational practices. Drawing from a
previously published meta-synthesis on adolescent experiences in reading intervention courses (RICs), the chapter
reveals challenges in applying findings to linguistically diverse students due to inconsistencies in data
representations of multilingualism. The chapter underscores the potential of attentive data analysis and proposes two
critical question sets to vet studies to ensure nuanced representations of linguistic diversity. By advocating for
thorough analyses in original research and refining meta-synthesis methodology, the chapter underscores the
significance of addressing multilingual students’ experiences in literacy education.
Article outline
- Introduction
- Overview of the study and its findings
- Setting the stage for meta-synthesis research
- Round 1: EL-identified high school students
- Round 2: Language background analysis
- Methodological discussion: Rethinking data for more equitable research
- Absence of bureaucratic label
- Absence of descriptions of language background
- Implications for qualitative research on multilingual literacy
development
- Critical question sets
- Attending to the method section
References
References (55)
Note. References with an asterisk are those that have been included in this chapter’s
analysis.
Abril-Gonzalez, P., & Shannon, S. M. (2021). English
language development jaulas: Latinx students’ critiques of ELD through confinement and resistance
testimonios. Bilingual Research
Journal, 44(4), 426–443.
Au, W. (2007). High-stakes
testing and curricular control: A qualitative metasynthesis. Educational
Researcher, 36(5), 258–267.
Baker-Bell, A. (2020). Dismantling
anti-black linguistic racism in English language arts classrooms: Toward an anti-racist black language
pedagogy. Theory into
Practice, 59(1), 8–21.
Berry, R., & Thunder, K. (2012). Mathematics
education at Teachers College. Journal of Mathematics Education at Teachers
College, 3(1), 43–55.
Boulay, B., Goodson, B., Frye, M., Blocklin, M., & Price, C. (2015). Summary
of research generated by Striving Readers on the effectiveness of interventions for struggling adolescent
readers (NCEE 2016- 4001). National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional
Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. [URL]
Brooks, M. D. (2018). Pushing
past myths: Designing instruction for long-term English learners. TESOL
Quarterly, 52(1), 221–233.
(2022). What
does it mean? EL-identified adolescents’ interpretations of testing and course
placement. TESOL
Quarterly, 56(4), 1218–1241.
*Brooks M. D., & Rodela, K. C. (2018). Why
am I in reading intervention? A dual analysis of entry and exit criteria. The
High School
Journal, 102(1), 72–93.
Callahan, R. M. (2006). The
intersection of accountability and language: Can reading intervention replace English language
development? Bilingual Research
Journal, 30(1), 1–21.
Cabral, B. (2023). Linguistic
confinement: Rethinking the racialized interplay between educational language learning and
carcerality. Race Ethnicity and
Education, 26(3), 277–297.
*Cantrell, S. C., Pennington, J., Rintamaa, M., Osborne, M., Parker, C., & Rudd, M. (2017). Supplemental
literacy instruction in high school: What students say matters for reading
engagement. Reading & Writing
Quarterly, 33(1), 54–70.
*Cantrell, S. C., & Rintamaa, M. (2020). The
nature of rural high school students’ reading engagement. Reading & Writing
Quarterly, 36(4), 297–319.
Catalano, T., Kiramba, L. K., & Viesca, K. (2020). Transformative
interviewing and the experiences of multilingual learners not labeled “ELL” in U.S.
schools. Bilingual Research
Journal, 43(2), 178–195.
Compton-Lilly, C., Rogers, R., & Ellison, T. L. (2021). Making
sense of literacy scholarship: Approaches to synthesizing literacy
research. Routledge.
Deroo, M. R., & Watson, V. W. (2020). “Air
I breathe”: Songwriting as literacy practices of remembrance. Journal of
Literacy
Research, 52(2), 158–179.
Edmonds, M. S., Vaughn, S., Wexler, J., Reutebuch, C., Cable, A., Tackett, K. K., & Schnakenberg, J. W. (2009). A
synthesis of reading interventions and effects on reading comprehension outcomes for older struggling
readers. Review of Educational
Research, 79(1), 262–300.
Finlayson, K., & Dixon, A. (2008). Qualitative
meta-synthesis: A guide for the novice. Nurse
Researcher, 15(2), 59–71.
Flores, N., Phuong, J., & Venegas, K. M. (2020). “Technically
an EL”: The production of raciolinguistic categories in a dual language
school. TESOL
Quarterly, 54(3), 629–651.
*Frankel, K. K. (2016). The
intersection of reading and identity in high school literacy intervention
classes. Research in the Teaching of
English, 51(1), 37–59.
Frankel, K. K., Brooks, M. D., & Learned, J. E. (2021). A
meta-synthesis of qualitative research on reading intervention classes in secondary
schools. Teachers College
Record, 123(8), 31–58.
García, O. (2009). Emergent
bilinguals and TESOL: What’s in a name? TESOL
Quarterly, 43(2), 322–326.
*Gerber H. R., Abrams S. S., Onwuegbuzie A. J., & Benge C. L. (2014). From
Mario to FIFA: What qualitative case study research suggests about games-based learning in a U.S.
classroom. Educational Media
International, 51(1), 16–34.
*Ginsberg, R. (2020). Dueling
narratives of a reader labeled as struggling: Positioning, emotion, and power within four differing English
course contexts. Journal of Education for Students Placed at
Risk, 25(1), 1–27.
Glick, Y., & Walquí, A. (2020). Affordances
in the development of student voice and agency: The case of bureaucratically labeled long-term English
learners. In A. Kibler, G. Valdés, & A. Walquí (Eds.), Reconceptualizing
the role of critical dialogue in American
classrooms (pp. 23–51). Routledge.
*Goering, C. Z., & Baker, K. F. (2010). “Like
the whole class has reading problems”: A study of oral reading fluency activities in a high intervention
setting. American Secondary
Education, 39(1), 61–77.
*Greenleaf, C. L., Schoenbach, R., Cziko, C., & Mueller, F. L. (2001). Apprenticing
adolescent readers to academic literacy. Harvard Educational
Review, 71(1), 79–129.
*Harmon, J., Wood, K., Smith, K., Zakaria, N., Ramadan, K., & Sykes, M. (2016). Teaching
and learning in high school reading classes: Perspectives of teachers and
students. Reading
Psychology, 37(7), 962–994.
Hernandez, S. J. (2017). Are
they all language learners? Educational labeling and raciolinguistic identifying in a California middle school
dual language program. CATESOL
Journal, 29(1), 133–154.
Hoon, C. (2013). Meta-synthesis
of qualitative case studies: An approach to theory building. Organizational
Research
Methods, 16(4), 522–556.
*Houchen, D. (2013). “Stakes
is high”: Culturally relevant practitioner inquiry with African American students struggling to pass secondary
reading exit exams. Urban
Education, 48(1), 92–115.
Kangas, S. E., & Cook, M. (2020). Academic
tracking of English learners with disabilities in middle school. American
Educational Research
Journal, 57(6), 2415–2449.
Kibler, A. K., & Valdés, G. (2016). Conceptualizing
language learners: Socioinstitutional mechanisms and their consequences. The
Modern Language
Journal, 100(S1), 96–116.
Kim, W. G. (2017). Long-term
English language learners’ educational experiences in the context of high-stakes
accountability. Teachers College
Record, 119(9), 1–32.
Kiramba, L. K., & Oloo, J. A. (2023). “It’s
OK. She doesn’t even speak English”: Narratives of language, culture, and identity negotiation by immigrant
high school students. Urban
Education, 58(3), 398–426.
Larson, J., Duret, E., Rees, J., & Anderson, J. (2021). Challenging
the autonomous wall: Literacy work in an urban high school. Journal of Literacy
Research, 53(2), 174–195.
*Learned, J. E. (2016). “The
behavior kids”: Examining the conflation of youth reading difficulty and behavior problem positioning among
school institutional contexts. American Educational Research
Journal, 53(5), 1271–1309.
Learned, J. E., Frankel, K. K., & Brooks, M. D. (2022). Disrupting
secondary reading intervention: A review of qualitative research and a call to
action. Journal of Adolescent & Adult
Literacy, 65(6), 507–517.
Leung, C., & Valdés, G. (2019). Translanguaging
and the transdisciplinary framework for language teaching and learning in a multilingual
world. The Modern Language
Journal, 103(2), 348–370.
Linares, R. E. (2021). Creating
and navigating a transborder writing space: One multilingual adolescent’s take-up of dialogue journaling in an
English-medium classroom. Reading Research
Quarterly, 56(4), 673–692.
Martínez, R. A. (2018). Beyond
the English learner label: Recognizing the richness of bi/multilingual students’ linguistic
repertoires. The Reading
Teacher, 71(5), 515–522.
Martínez, R. A., Martinez, D. C., & Morales, P. Z. (2022). Black
lives matter versus Castañeda v. Pickard: A utopian vision of who counts as bilingual (and who matters in
bilingual education). Language
Policy, 21(3), 427–449.
*Masterson, J. E. (2020). Reading
in “purgatory”: Tactical literacies in a remedial reading class. Reading
Research
Quarterly, 57(1), 91–109.
May, S. (Ed.). (2014). The
multilingual turn: Implications for SLA, TESOL and bilingual
education. Routledge.
McMurtry, T. (2021). With
liberty and Black linguistic justice for all: Pledging allegiance to anti-racist language
pedagogy. Journal of Adolescent & Adult
Literacy, 65(2), 175–178.
*Paterson, P. O., & Elliott, L. N. (2006). Struggling
reader to struggling reader: High school students’ responses to a cross-age tutoring
program. Journal of Adolescent & Adult
Literacy, 49(5), 378–389.
*Sarroub, L. K., & Pernicek, T. (2016). Books,
boys, and boredom: A case of three high school boys and their encounters with
literacy. Reading & Writing
Quarterly, 32(1), 27–55.
Seltzer, K. (2020). “My
English is its own rule”: Voicing a translingual sensibility through
poetry. Journal of Language, Identity &
Education, 19(5), 297–311.
*Skerrett, A. (2012). “We
hatched in this class”: Repositioning of identity in and beyond a reading
classroom. The High School
Journal, 95(3), 62–75.
Street, B. (1998). New
literacies in theory and practice: What are the implications for Language in Eduction. Linguistics and
Education, 10(1), 1–24.
Umansky, I. M., & Dumont, H. (2021). English
learner labeling: How English learner classification in kindergarten shapes teacher perceptions of student
skills and the moderating role of bilingual instructional settings. American
Educational Research
Journal, 58(5), 993–1031.
Valdés, G. (2018). What’s
in a name: An argument for the use of accurate and specific language in both research and practice [Paper
presentation]. 2018 Annual Conference of the American Association of Applied
Linguistics, Chicago, IL.
(2020). (Mis)
educating the children of Mexican-origin people in the United States: The challenge of internal language
borders. Intercultural
Education, 31(5), 548–561.
