In:Ethnographies of Academic Writing Research: Theory, methods, and interpretation
Edited by Ignacio Guillén-Galve and Ana Bocanegra-Valle
[Research Methods in Applied Linguistics 1] 2021
► pp. 105–124
Chapter 6Walking on thin ice
Reflexivity in doing ethnography
Published online: 26 October 2021
https://doi.org/10.1075/rmal.1.06khu
https://doi.org/10.1075/rmal.1.06khu
Abstract
Researcher reflexivity is important throughout the research process, especially in ethnographic enquiry. This chapter
provides a reflexive account of our research experiences with exiled Syrian academics, whose efforts to re-establish their academic
careers in their new contexts and publish in English as an Additional Language we have been following for more than two years. Data are
taken from a longitudinal multiple-case study using ethnography as deep theorizing (Lillis,
2008). In this chapter we provide a reflexive account of five research methodological aspects: participant recruitment,
conducting and analysing interviews, Text Histories, textual representation, and ethics in collaborative ethnography. We discuss how
aspects of the researcher’s experience and position interact with the research process.
Article outline
- Introduction
- Researcher reflexivity: Degrees and types
- Overview of the research project
- Reflections on methodological decisions in the research process
- Participant recruitment
- Conducting and analysing interviews
- Text Histories (THs)
- Textual representation
- Ethics in collaborative ethnography
- Conclusion
Acknowledgements Note References
References (56)
Agar, M. (2006). An ethnography by any other name…. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 7(4), Art. 36.
Asselin, M. E. (2003). Insider research: Issues to consider when doing qualitative research in your own setting. Journal for Nurses in Staff Development, 19(2), 99–103.
Becher, T., & Trowler, P. (2001). Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the culture of disciplines (2nd ed.). Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.
Birt, L., Scott, S., Cavers, D., Campbell, C., & Walter, F. (2016). Member checking. Qualitative Health Research, 26(13), 1802–1811.
Bracken, L. J., & Oughton, E. A. (2006). “What do you mean?” The importance of language in developing interdisciplinary research. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 31(3), 371–382.
Budach, G. (2019). Collaborative ethnography. In K. Tusting. (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of linguistic ethnography (pp. 198–212). Routledge.
Colbourne, L., & Sque, M. (2004). Split personalities: Role conflict between the nurse and the nurse researcher. NT Research, 9(4), 297–304.
Curry, M. J., & Lillis, T. (2010). Academic research networks: Accessing resources for English-medium publishing. English for Specific Purposes, 29(4), 281–295.
De Costa, P. I. (2010). From refugee to transformer: A bourdieusian take on a Hmong learner’s trajectory. TESOL Quarterly, 44(3), 517–541.
De Fina, A., Paternostro, G., & Amoruso, M. (2020). Odysseus the traveler: Appropriation of a chronotope in a community of practice. Language & Communication, 70, 71–81.
DeLyser, D. (2001). “Do you really live here?” Thoughts on insider research. Geographical Review, 91(1–2), 441–453.
Dowling, M. (2008). Reflexivity. In L. M. Given. (Ed.), The Sage encyclopedia of qualitative research methods (pp. 748–749). Sage.
(2010). Language socialization into academic discourse communities. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 30, 169–192.
Essak, A. (2012). Refugee college students acquiring academic literacy:An exploration of how their views of academic literacy impact the process (Unpublished PhD dissertation). Wayne State University.
Finlay, L. (2002). “Outing” the researcher: The provenance, process, and practice of reflexivity. Qualitative Health Research, 12(4), 531–545.
Guba, E., & Lincoln, Y. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & S. Lincoln. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 105–117). Sage.
Hirano, E. (2014). Refugees in first-year college: Academic writing challenges and resources. Journal of Second Language Writing, 23, 37–52.
Holmes, P., Fay, R., Andrews, J. & Attia, J. (2016). How to research multilingually: possibilities and complexities. In Z. Hua. (Ed.), Research methods in intercultural communication: A practical guide (pp. 88–102). Wiley-Blackwell.
Hyland, K., & Tse, P. (2004). Metadiscourse in academic writing: A reappraisal. Applied Linguistics, 25(2), 156–177.
Hynes, T. (2003). The issue of ‘trust’ or ‘mistrust’ in research with refugees: Choices, caveats and considerations for researchers, Working Paper 98, New issues in refugee research, United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, Geneva.
Ivanič, R. (1998). Writing and identity: The discoursal construction of identity in academic writing. John Benjamins.
Ivanič, R., & Weldon, S. (1999). Researching the writer-reader relationship. In C. N. Candlin & K. Hyland. (Eds.), Writing: texts, processes and practices (pp. 168–192). Addison Wesley Longman.
Kanuha, V. K. (2000). “Being” native versus “going native”: Conducting social work research as an insider. Social Work, 45(5), 439–447.
Katyal, K. R., & King, M. (2011). “Outsiderness” and “insiderness” in a Confucian society: Complexity of contexts. Comparative Education, 47(3), 327–341.
Khuder, B. (2021). Science in exile: EAL academic literacies development of exiled Syrian academics. Unpublished PhD thesis. Birkbeck, University of London, London, UK.
Kim, K. M. (2018). Academic socialization of doctoral students through feedback networks: A qualitative understanding of the graduate feedback landscape. Teaching in Higher Education, 23(8), 1–18.
Koch, T., & Harrington, A. (1998). Reconceptualizing rigour: The case for reflexivity. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 28(4), 882–890.
Lalor, J. G., Begley, C. M., & Devane, D. (2006). Exploring painful experiences: Impact of emotional narratives on members of a qualitative research team. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 56(6), 607–616.
Lillis, T. (2008). Ethnography as method, methodology, and “deep theorizing”: Closing the gap between text and context in academic writing research. Written Communication, 25(3), 353–388.
Lillis, T., & Curry, M. J. (2010). Academic writing in a global context : The politics and practices of publishing in English. Routledge.
Lyall, C., Bruce, A., Tait, J., & Meagher, L. (2011). Interdisciplinary research journeys: Practical strategies for capturing creativity. Bloomsbury Academic.
Malterud, K. (2001). Qualitative research: Standards, challenges, and guidelines. The Lancet, 358(9280), 483–488.
Marcos, L. R. (1976). Bilinguals in psychotherapy: Language as an emotional barrier. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 30(4), 552–560.
Marcus, G. E. (1994). What comes (just) after ‘post’? The case of ethnography. In: N. Denzin, & Y. Lincoln. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 563–574). Sage.
Marsh, C. A., Browne, J., Taylor, J., & Davis, D. (2017). A researcher’s journey: Exploring a sensitive topic with vulnerable women. Women and Birth, 30(1), 63–69.
McNess, E., Arthur, L., & Crossley, M. (2015). ‘Ethnographic dazzle’ and the construction of the ‘Other’: Revisiting dimensions of insider and outsider research for international and comparative education. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 45(2), 295–316.
Milligan, L. (2014). Insider-outsider-inbetweener? Researcher positioning, participative methods and cross-cultural educational research. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 46(2), 235–250.
Ochieng, B. M. N. (2010). “You know what I meanˮ: The ethical and methodological dilemmas and challenges for black researchers interviewing black families. Qualitative Health Research, 20(12), 1725–1735.
Paltridge, B., Starfield, S., & Tardy, C. (2016). Ethnographic perspectives on academic writing. Oxford University Press.
Pavlenko, A. (2012). Affective processing in bilingual speakers: Disembodied cognition? International Journal of Psychology, 47(6), 405–428.
Rhodes, R. A. W. (1994). The hollowing out of the state: The changing nature of the public service in Britain. The Political Quarterly, 65(2), 138–151.
Rothkopf, D. (2014). A time of unprecedented instability? Foreign policy. FP. Retrieved on 2 June 2021 from [URL]
Schweitzer, R., & Steel, Z. (2008). Researching refugees: Methodological and ethical considerations. In P. Liamputtong. (Ed.), Doing cross-cultural research: Ethical and methodological perspectives (pp. 87–101). Springer.
Silva Rojas, M., Armijo Nuñez, J., & Nuñez Erices, G. (2015). Philosophical and psychopathological perspective of exile: On time and space experiences. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 6, article 78.
Starfield, S. (2013). Researcher reflexivity. In C. A. Chapelle. (Ed.) The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics (pp. 4931–4937). Wiley-Blackwell.
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Dressen‐Hammouda, Dacia
Khuder, Baraa & Bojana Petrić
2022. Academic texts in motion. Journal of English for Research Publication Purposes 3:1 ► pp. 51 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
