Cover not available

In:Ethnographies of Academic Writing Research: Theory, methods, and interpretation
Edited by Ignacio Guillén-Galve and Ana Bocanegra-Valle
[Research Methods in Applied Linguistics 1] 2021
► pp. 61–82

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Chapter 4
Understanding academics online

Ethnographic approaches to the analysis of online academic discourse and practices

 | University of Zaragoza
 | University of Zaragoza
Published online: 26 October 2021
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/rmal.1.04alb
Abstract
In the 21st century academic activity and communication are mediated by digital technologies, which enable scholars to engage in new social practices. Although ethnography is an appropriate approach to analyse these practices, the online environment, with its constraints and affordances, requires adjustments in pre-digital ethnography, regarding, among others, how the setting of research is defined, or how observation or interviews are conducted (Garcia, Standlee, Bechkoff, & Cui, 2009). This chapter provides a review of ethnographically-oriented research on academic communication in online settings and of the different ethnographic approaches that are being used to analyse scholars’ digital practices. By doing so, the chapter contributes to the overall aims of the book by offering useful insights to advance the methodological knowledge of researchers interested in (online) academic practices.
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • Theoretical framework
    • What is digital ethnography?
    • Adjustments of pre-digital ethnography to the online environment
  • Methodology: Selection and analysis of ethnographically-oriented studies
  • Online academic practices: Ethnographically-oriented studies
    • Surveys and questionnaires
    • Interviews
    • Observation and document analysis
    • Reflection on one’s own writing
  • Conclusions and implications
  • Notes
  • References
References (65)
References
Androutsopoulos, J. (2008). Potentials and limitations of discourse-centred online ethnography. Language@Internet, 5, article 9. Retrieved on 2 June 2021 from [URL]
Androutsopoulos, J., & Stæhr, A. C. (2018). Moving methods online: Researching digital language practices. In A. Creese & A. Blackledge. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of language and superdiversity (pp. 118–132). Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bardakcı, S., Arslan, Ö., & Ünver, T. K. (2017). How scholars use academic social networking services. Information Development, 34(4), 334–345. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barton, D., & McCulloch, S. (2018). Negotiating tensions around new forms of academic writing. Discourse, Context & Media, 24, 8–15. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Berger, R. (2013). Now I see it, now I don’t: Researcher’s position and reflexivity in qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 15(2), 219–234. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Berthod, O., Grothe-Hammer, M., & Sydow, J. (2017). Network ethnography: A mixed-method approach for the study of practices in interorganizational settings. Organizational Research Methods, 20(2), 299–323. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Borgman, C. L. (2007). Scholarship in the digital age: Information, infrastructure and the internet. The MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
boyd, d. (2008). Taken out of context: American teen sociality in networked publics (Unpublished PhD dissertation). University of California-Berkeley.
(2014). It’s complicated. The social lives of networked teens. Yale University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bukvova, H. (2011). Scientists online: A framework for the analysis of internet profiles. First Monday, 16(10). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chikoore, L., Probets, S., Fry, J., & Creaser, C. (2016). How are UK academics engaging the public with their research? A cross-disciplinary perspective. Higher Education Quarterly, 70(2), 145–169. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Collins, K., Shiffman, D., & Rock, J. (2016). How are scientists using social media in the workplace? PLoS ONE, 11(10). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Colson, V. (2011). Science blogs as competing channels for the dissemination of science news. Journalism, 12(7), 889–902. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Costa, C. (2015). Outcasts on the inside: Academics reinventing themselves online. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 34(2), 194–210. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Côté, I. M., & Darling, E. S. (2018). Scientists on Twitter: Preaching to the choir or singing from the rooftops? FACETS, 3, 682–694. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Esposito, A. (2013). Neither digital or open. Just researchers: Views on digital/open scholarship practices in an Italian university. First Monday, 18(1). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Evans, L. (2010). Authenticity online: Using webnography to address phenomenological concerns. In A. Mousoutzanis & D. Riha. (Eds.), New media and the politics of online communities (pp. 11–17). Inter-Disciplinary Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ferris, S. P. (2011). Millenials, social networking and social responsibility. In Management Association, Information Resources (Ed.), Virtual communities: Concepts, methodologies, tools and applications (pp. 277–291). IGI Global. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Garcia, A. C., Standlee, A. I., Bechkoff, J., & Cui, Y. (2009). Ethnographic approaches to the internet and computer-mediated communication. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 38(1), 52–84. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. Basic Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gillen, J., & Merchant, G. (2013). Contact calls: Twitter as a dialogic social and linguistic practice. Language Sciences, 35, 47–58. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Green, J., & Bloome, D. (1997). Ethnography and ethnographers of and in education: A situated perspective. In J. Flood, S. Heath, & D. Lapp. (Eds.), A Handbook of research on teaching literacy through the communicative and visual arts (pp. 181–202). Simon & Schuster Macmillan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gruzd, A., Staves, K., & Wilk, A. (2012). Connected scholars: Examining the role of social media in research practices of faculty using the UTAUT model. The Internet and Higher Education, 28(6), 43–50. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hafner, C. A. (2018). Genre innovation and multimodal expression in scholarly communication: Video methods articles in experimental biology. Ibérica, 36, 15–41.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hallett, R. E., & Barber, K. (2014). Ethnographic research in a cyber era. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 43(3), 306–330. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heap, T., & Minocha, S. (2012). An empirically grounded framework to guide blogging for digital scholarship. Research in Learning Technology, 20, 176–188. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hine, C. (2000). Virtual ethnography. Sage. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jarreau, P. (2015). ‘Science bloggers’ self-perceived communication roles. JCOM, 14(4). Retrieved on 2 June 2021 from [URL]
Jordan, K. (2014). Academics and their online networks: Exploring the role of academic social networking sites. First Monday, 19(11). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kozinets, R. V. (2009). Netnography: Doing ethnographic research online. Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
LaPoe, V. L., Olson, C. C., & Eckert, S. (2017). “Linkedin is my office, Facebook my living room, Twitter the neighbourhood bar”: Media scholars liminal use of social media for peer and public communication. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 41(3), 185–206. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Latzko-Toth, G., Bonneau, C., & Millette, M. (2017). Small data, thick data: Thickening strategies for trace-based social media research. In A. Quan-Haase, & L. Sloan. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of social media research methods (pp. 199–214). Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lemon, N., & McPherson, M. (2017). Intersections online: Academics who tweet. In D. Lupton, I. Mewburn, & P. Thomson. (Eds.), The digital academic: Critical perspectives on digital technologies in higher education (pp. 78–90). Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lillis, T. (2008). Ethnography as method, methodology, and “deep theorizing”: Closing the gap between text and context in academic writing research. Written Communication, 25(3), 353–388. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lupton, D. (2014). ‘Feeling better connected’: Academics’ use of social media. News & Media Research Centre, University of Canberra.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Luzón, M. J. (2019). “Meet our group!” Addressing multiple audiences on the websites of Spanish research groups. IJES: International Journal of English Studies, 19(2), 37–59. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lyman, P., & Wakeford, N. (1999). Introduction: Going into the (virtual) field. American Behavioral Scientist, 43(3), 359–376. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mahrt, M., & Puschmann, C. (2014). Science blogging: An exploratory study of motives, styles, and audience reactions. JCOM, 13(03). Retrieved on 2 June 2021 from [URL].
McGrath, L. (2016). Open-access writing: An investigation into the online drafting and revision of a research article in pure mathematics. English for Specific Purposes, 43, 25–36. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mkono, M., & Markwell, K. (2014). The application of ethnography in tourism studies. Annals of Tourism Research, 48, 289–291. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mohammadi, E., Thelwall, M., Kwasny, M., & Holmes, K. L. (2018). Academic information on Twitter: A user survey. PLoS ONE, 13(5). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Murthy, D. (2008). Digital ethnography: An examination of the use of new technologies for social research. Sociology, 42(5), 837–855. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pink, S., Horst, H. A., Postill, J., Hjorth, L., Lewis, T., & Tacchi, J. (2016). Digital ethnography: Principles and practice. Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reid, G., & Anson, C. M. (2019). Public- and expert-facing communication: A case study of polycontextuality and context collapse in Internet-mediated citizen science. In M. J. Luzón, & C. Pérez-Llantada. (Eds.), Science communication on the Internet: Old genres meet new genres (pp. 219–238). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Riesch, H., & Mendel, J. (2014). Science blogging: Networks, boundaries and limitations. Science as Culture, 23(1), 51–72. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Riva, G. (2002). The sociocognitive psychology of computer-mediated communication: The present and future of technology-based interactions. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 5(6), 581–598. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Robinson, L., & Schulz, J. (2009). New avenues for sociological inquiry. Sociology – The Journal of The British Sociological Association, 43, 685–698. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ruhleder, K. (2000). The virtual ethnographer: Fieldwork in distributed electronic environments. Field Methods, 12(1), 3–17. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Saunders, M. E., Duffy, M. A., Heard, S. B., Kosmala, M., Leather, S. R., McGlynn, T. P., Ollerton, J., & Parachnowitsch, A. L. (2017). Bringing ecology blogging into the scientific fold: Measuring reach and impact of science community blogs. Royal Society Open Science, 4(10). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scanlon, E. (2014). Scholarship in the digital age. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(1), 12–23. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scheliga, K., Friesike, S., Puschmann, C., & Fecher, B. (2018). Setting up crowd science projects. Public Understanding of Science, 27(5), 515–534. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smith, A. (2015). “Wow, I didn’t know that before; thank you”: How scientists use Twitter for public engagement. Journal of Promotional Communications, 3(3), 320–339.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stewart, B. (2015). In abundance: Networked participatory practices as scholarship. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(3), 318–340. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2016a). Collapsed publics: Orality, literacy, and vulnerability in academic Twitter. Journal of Applied Social Theory, 1(1), 61–86.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2016b). Twitter as method: Using twitter as a tool to conduct research. In L. Sloan & A. Quan-Haase. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of social media research methods (pp. 251–265). Sage. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sveningsson, M. (2004). Ethics in Internet ethnography. In E. A. Buchanan. (Ed.), Readings in virtual research ethics (pp. 45–61). Information Science. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thorsen, E. (2013). Blogging on the ice: Connecting audiences with climate-change sciences. International Journal of Media & Cultural Politics, 9(1), 87–101. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Varis, P. (2016). Digital ethnography. In A. Georgakopoulou & T. Spiloti. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of language and digital communication (pp. 55–68). Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Veletsianos, G. (2013). Open practices and identity. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(4), 639–651. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Veletsianos, G., & Kimmons, R. (2013). Scholars and faculty members’ lived experiences in online social networks. The Internet and Higher Education, 16, 43–50. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Veletsianos, G., & Stewart, B. (2016). Discreet openness: Scholars’ selective and intentional self-disclosures online. Social Media + Society, 2(3). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Walter, S., Lörcher, I., & Brüggemann, M. (2019). Scientific networks on Twitter: Analyzing scientists’ interactions in the climate change debate. Public Understanding of Science, 28(6), 696–712. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weller, M. (2011). The digital scholar: How technology is transforming scholarly practice. Bloomsbury Academic. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yang, G. (2003). The Internet and the rise of a transnational Chinese cultural sphere. Media, Culture & Society, 25(4), 469–490. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zhu, Y., & Purdam, K. (2017). Social media, science communication and the academic super user in the United Kingdom. First Monday, 22(11). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue