In:Ethnographies of Academic Writing Research: Theory, methods, and interpretation
Edited by Ignacio Guillén-Galve and Ana Bocanegra-Valle
[Research Methods in Applied Linguistics 1] 2021
► pp. 1–20
Chapter 1Methodological reflections on and participatory episodes of ethnographic academic writing research
Published online: 26 October 2021
https://doi.org/10.1075/rmal.1.01boc
https://doi.org/10.1075/rmal.1.01boc
Abstract
This chapter presents the current state of ethnographic research as applied to academic writing. First, we articulate the significance of ethnography as a methodological approach for the study of writing in academic settings. Next, we provide a critical exploration of the current state of research in terms of key methodological issues which feature prominently in ethnographically-oriented academic writing studies: thick description, deep theorizing, methodological alignment with ethnography, participatory research, research reflexivity, and ethics and trustworthiness. In the final two sections, we give an overview of the volume and showcase its contribution to existing disciplinary and methodological debates.
Keywords: academic writing, ethics, ethnography, reflexivity, thick description
Article outline
- An introduction to ethnography and academic writing research
- Key methodological issues in ethnographically-oriented academic writing research
- Situating the book in relevant scholarship
- Thick description and deep theorizing
- Methodological alignment with ethnography
- Participatory research and researcher reflexivity
- Ethics and trustworthiness
- Organisation of the book and chapter summaries
- Contribution of the book to current methodological debates
- Thick description, thick participation, and deep theorizing
- Participatory research and researcher reflexivity
- Ethics and trustworthiness
- The book in a nutshell
References
References (59)
Allwright, D. (2005). Developing principles for practitioner research: The case of exploratory practice. Modern Language Journal, 89, 353–366.
Androutsopoulos, J. (2008). Potentials and limitations of discourse-centred online ethnography. Language@Internet, 5, article 9. Retrieved on 2 June 2021 from [URL]
Atkinson, D. (2005). Situated qualitative research and second language writing. In P. K. Matsuda & T. Silva. (Eds.), Second language writing research. Perspectives on the process of knowledge construction (pp. 49–64). Routledge.
Blommaert, J. (2007). On scope and depth in linguistic ethnography. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 11(5), 682–688.
Canagarajah, A. S. (2011). Codemeshing in academic writing: Identifying teachable strategies of translanguaging. The Modern Language Journal, 95(3), 401–417.
(2013). Negotiating translingual literacy: An enactment. Research in the Teaching of English, 48(1), 40–67.
Cintron, R. (1993). Wearing a pith helmet at a sly angle or can writing researchers do ethnography in a postmodern era? Written Communication, 10(3), 371–412.
Copland, F., & Creese, A. (2015). Ethical issues in linguistic ethnography. Balancing the micro and the macro. In P. De Costa. (Ed.), Ethics in applied linguistics research: Language researcher narratives (pp. 161–178). Routledge.
Corcoran, J. N., Englander, K., & Muresan, L. -M. (Eds.), (2019). Pedagogies and policies for publishing research in English: Local initiatives supporting international scholars. Routledge.
Creese, A. (2012). Introduction. Part VI. Building researcher-researched relationships. In M. Martin-Jones, & S. Gardner. (Eds.), Multilingualism, discourse and ethnography (pp. 285–287). Routledge.
Cressey, G. (2012). Diaspora youth, ancestral languages and English as ‘translation’ in multilingual space. In M. Martin-Jones, & S. Gardner. (Eds.), Multilingualism, discourse and ethnography (pp. 131–144). Routledge.
Curry, M. J., & Lillis, T. (2010). Academic research networks: Accessing resources for English-Medium publishing. English for Specific Purposes, 29, 281–295.
De Costa, P. I. (2014). Making ethical decisions in an ethnographic study. TESOL Quarterly, 48(2), 413–422.
(2015). Ethics in applied linguistics research. In B. Paltridge, & A. Phakiti. (Eds.), Research methods in applied linguistics: A practical resource (pp. 245–257). Bloomsbury.
De Costa, P. I., Sterling, S., Lee, J., Li, W., & Rawal, H. (2020). Research tasks on ethics in applied linguistics. Language Teaching, 54(1), 1–13.
Dressen-Hammouda, D. (2013). Ethnographic approaches to ESP research. In B. Paltridge & S. Starfield. (Eds.), The handbook of English for specific purposes (pp. 501–517). Wiley-Blackwell.
Flowerdew, J. (2002). Ethnographically inspired approaches to the study of academic discourse. In J. Flowerdew. (Ed.), Academic discourse (pp. 235–252). Routledge.
Gibb, R., Tremlett, A., & Danero Iglesias, J. (Eds.), (2019). Learning and using languages in ethnographic research. Multilingual matters.
Hammersley, M. (2007). Reflections on linguistic ethnography. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 11(5), 689–695.
Harklau, L. (2005). Ethnography and ethnographic research on second language teaching and learning. In E. Hinkel. (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (Vol. 1, pp. 179–194). Routledge.
(2011). Approaches and methods in recent qualitative research. In E. Hinkel. (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (Vol. 2, pp. 175–189). Routledge.
Hornberger, N. (2006). Negotiating methodological rich points in applied linguistics research: An ethnographer’s view. In M. Chalhoub-Deville, C. A. Chapelle, & P. Duff. (Eds.), Inference and generalizability in applied linguistics (pp. 221–240). John Benjamins.
Kubanyiova, M. (2008). Rethinking research ethics in contemporary applied linguistics: The tension between macroethical and microethical perspectives in situated research. Modern Language Journal, 92(4), 503–518.
Lea, M. R., & Street, B. V. (2006). The “Academic Literacies” model: Theory and applications. Theory Into Practice, 45(4), 368–377.
Leeds-Hurwitz, W. (2015). Thick description. In K. Tracy, C. Ilie, & T. Sandel. (Eds.), International encyclopedia of language and social interaction (Vol. 3, pp. 1515–1520). John Wiley & Sons.
Lillis, T. (2008). Ethnography as method, methodology, and “deep theorizing”: Closing the gap between text and context in academic writing. Written Communication, 25(3), 353–388.
Lillis, T., & Curry, M. J. (2010). Academic writing in a global context. The politics and practices of publishing in English. Routledge.
Martin-Jones, M., & Gardner, S. (Eds.), (2012). Multilingualism, discourse and ethnography. Routledge.
Miller, T., Birch, M., Mauthner, M., & Jessop, J. (2012). Ethics in qualitative research (2nd ed.). Sage.
Muresan, L. -M., & Orna-Montesinos, C. (Eds.), (2021). Academic literacy development: Perspectives on multilingual scholars’ approaches to writing. Palgrave Macmillan.
Nunan, D., & Choi, J. (2011). Shifting sands. The evolving story of “voice” in qualitative research. In E. Hinkel. (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (Vol. 2, pp. 222–236). Routledge.
Ortega, L. (2005). For what and for whom is our research? The ethical as transformative lens in instructed SLA. Modern Language Journal, 89, 427–443.
Paltridge, B. (2004). The exegesis as a genre: an ethnographic examination. In L. J. Ravelli & R. A. Ellis. (Eds.), Analysing academic writing (pp. 84–103). Continuum.
(2014). What motivates applied linguistics research? AILA Review, 27, 98–104.
Paltridge, B., & Starfield, S. (2016). Ethnographic perspectives on English for academic purposes. In K. Hyland & P. Shaw. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of English for academic purposes (pp. 218–229). Routledge.
Paltridge, B., Starfield, S., & Tardy, C. M. (2016). Ethnographic perspectives on academic writing. Oxford University Press.
Prior, P. (1995). Redefining the task: An ethnographic examination of writing and response in graduate seminars. In D. Belcher & G. Braine. (Eds.), Academic writing in a second language: Essays on research and pedagogy (pp. 47–82). Ablex.
(1998). Writing/disciplinarily: A sociohistoric account of literate activity in the academy. Routledge.
Ramanathan, V., & Atkinson, D. (1999). Ethnographic approaches and methods in L2 writing research: A critical guide and review. Applied Linguistics, 20(1), 44–70.
Reeves, S., Kuper, A., & Hodges, B. D. (2008). Qualitative research methodologies: Ethnography. BMJ, 337, 512–514.
Richardson, S., & McMullan, M. (2007). Research ethics in the UK: What can sociology learn from health? Sociology, 41(6), 1115–1132.
Roozen, K. (2010). Tracing trajectories of practice: Repurposing in one student’s developing disciplinary writing processes. Written Communication, 27(3), 318–354.
Sarangi, S. (2006). The conditions and consequences of professional discourse studies. In R. Kiely, P. Rea-Dickins, H. Woodfield, & G. Clibbon. (Eds.), Language, culture, identity in applied linguistics (pp. 199–220). Equinox.
Scott Jones, J. (2010). Origins and ancestors. A brief history of ethnography. In J. Scott Jones & S. Watt. (Eds.), Ethnography in social science practice (pp. 13–27). Routledge.
Starfield, B. (2004). Word power: negotiating success in a first-year sociology essay. In L. J. Ravelli & R. A. Ellis. (Eds.), Analysing academic writing (pp. 66–83). Continuum.
Starfield, S. (2011). Doing critical ethnographic research into academic writing: The theory of the methodology. In D. Belcher, A. M. Johns, & B. Paltridge. (Eds.), New directions in English for specific purposes research (pp. 174–196). University of Michigan Press.
(2013). Researcher reflexivity. In C. Chapelle. (Ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics (pp. 4931–4937). Wiley-Blackwell.
Street, B. V. (2009). “Hidden” features of academic paper writing. Working papers in educational linguistics, 24(1), Article 1. Retrieved on 2 June 2021 from [URL]
Swales, J. M. (1998). Other floors, other voices. A textography of a small university building. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
(2019). Ethnographies of academic writing: The writing on the wall? Plenary presented at Ethnographies of Academic Writing Conference, University of Zaragoza (Spain), 16–17 May.
Tagg, C., Lyons, A., Hu, R., & Rock, F. (2016). The ethics of digital ethnography in a team project. Applied Linguistics Review, 8(2–3), 271–292.
Tusting, K., McCulloch, S., Bhatt, I., Hamilton, M., & Barton, D. (2019). Academics writing. The dynamics of knowledge creation. Routledge.
Warriner, D. S., & Bigelow, M. (Eds.), (2019). Critical reflections on research methods. Power and equity in complex multilingual contexts. Multilingual Matters.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
