Cover not available

In:Romance Linguistics 2013: Selected papers from the 43rd Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL), New York, 17-19 April, 2013
Edited by Christina Tortora, Marcel den Dikken, Ignacio L. Montoya and Teresa O'Neill
[Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 9] 2016
► pp. 159–176

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Gender agreement with animate nouns in French

 | Département de Linguistique, Faculté des Lettres, Université de Genève
 | Department of Linguistics, University of Amsterdam
Published online: 3 February 2016
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/rllt.9.09ihs
Grammatical gender and semantic gender do not always go hand in hand. In French such mismatches can be observed outside the strict DP. To account for such phenomena and for gender more generally, we propose that gender is expressed in two positions within DP: on N as an uninterpretable feature accounting for grammatical gender and on the head of a Gender Phrase as a feature accounting for semantic gender. To account for the mismatches we discuss, we propose that the gender of the nouns involved is unspecified inside DP and that it can be specified in D later in the derivation.We further show that inside the strict DP, grammatical gender agreement between Gen and NP is stricter than in the ‘looser’ DP (partitive), which is in turn stricter than the agreeing/referring relation with elements outside DP, reflecting Corbett’s agreement hierarchy, to which we add a partitive position.
References (23)
References
Alexiadou, Artemis. 2004. “Inflection Class, Gender and DP-internal Structure.” Explorations in Nominal Inflection ed. by Gereon Muller, et al., 21–50. Berlin: Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Atkinson, Emily. 2015. “Gender Features on n & the Root: An account of gender in French.” Selected Proceedings of the LSRL 42 ed. by Jason Smith and Tabea Ihsane, 229–244. John Benjamins.
Carstens, Vicki. 2000. “Concord in Minimalist Theory.” Linguistic Inquiry 31.319–355. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2000. “Minimalist Inquiries: the Framework.” Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik ed. by Roger Martin, David Michaels and Juan Uriagereka, 89–155. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001. “Derivation by Phase.” Ken Hale: A Life in Language ed. by Michael Kenstowicz, 1–52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Corbett, Greville. 1979. “The Agreement Hierarchy.” Journal of Linguistics 15.203–224. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2003. “Agreement: Terms and Boundaries.” The Role of Agreement in Natural Language: TLS 5 Proceedings ed. by William E. Griffin, 109–122. Texas Linguistics Forum, 53.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frampton, John and Sam Gutmann. 2000. “Agreement is Feature Sharing.” Ms. Northeastern University. Boston. [URL].
Harris, James. 1991. “The Exponence of Gender in Spanish.” Linguistic Inquiry 22.27–62.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hinzen, Wolfram. 2012. “Phases and Semantics.” Phases: Developing the Framework ed. by Ángel J. Gallego, 309–342. Berlin & Boston: Walter de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kramer, Ruth. 2009. Definite Markers, Phi-features and Agreement: A Morphosyntactic Investigation of the Amharic DP. Ph.D. dissertation, UC Santa Cruz.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Legate, Julie Anne. 2002. “Phases in ‘beyond Explanatory Adequacy’.” Ms., MIT.
Leslau, Wolf. 1995. Reference Grammar of Amharic. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lowenstamm, Jean. 2008. “On Little n, √, and Types of Nouns.” Sounds of Silence: Empty Elements in Syntax and Phonology ed. by Jutta Hartmann, Veronika Hegedus and Henk van Riemsdijk 105–144. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Percus, Orin. 2011. “Gender Features and Interpretation: A case study.” Morphology 21.167–196. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pesetsky, David and Esther Torrego. 2007. “The Syntax of Valuation and the Interpretability of Features.” Phrasal and Clausal Architecture: Syntactic Derivation and Interpretation ed. by Simin Karimi, Vida Samiian and Wendy K. Wilkins, 262–294. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Picallo, Carmen. 1991. “Nominals and Nominalizations in Catalan.” Probus 3.279–316. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Preminger, Omer. 2009. “Breaking Agreements: Distinguishing Agreement and Clitic Doubling by their Failures.” Linguistic Inquiry 40:4.619-666. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. Agreement as a Fallible Operation. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rey-Debove, Josette and Alain Rey. 2010. Le Nouveau Petit Robert de la Langue Française. Paris: Dictionnaires le Robert.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ritter, Elisabeth. 1993. “Where’s Gender?” Linguistic Inquiry 24:3.795–803.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yatsushiro, Kazuko and Uli Sauerland. 2006. “[Feminine] in a High Position.” Snippets 13.11–12.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zamparelli, Roberto. 2008. “On the Interpretability of φ-features.” The Bantu–Romance Connection ed. by Cécile De Cat and Katherine Demuth, 167–199. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Zanoli, Emma
2022. A Linguistic Perspective on Feminisation and Gender-Inclusive Language How Partitive Constructions Can Be Used to Uncover Implicit Gender Bias in Italian . Annali di Ca’ Foscari. Serie occidentale :56 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue