In:Romance Linguistics 2012: Selected papers from the 42nd Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL), Cedar City, Utah, 20-22 April 2012
Edited by Jason Smith and Tabea Ihsane
[Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 7] 2015
► pp. 201–214
Bare PPs and the syntax-semantics interface
The case of sin + bare nominal structures in Spanish
Published online: 28 August 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/rllt.7.13cas
https://doi.org/10.1075/rllt.7.13cas
Spanish prepositional phrases headed by sin “without” with a bare noun complement (una habitación sin luz “a room without light”; un hombre sin corbata “a man without tie”) show interesting gradability properties: Degree modification is allowed if the N complement is a mass noun (una habitación muy sin luz “lit. a room very without light”; *un hombre muy sin corbata “lit. a man very without tie”). We claim that sin-PPs (sin-Preposition Phrases) hare syntactic and semantic properties with constructions involving light verbs that select for bare nouns. We argue that (a) a property-denoting bare NP pseudo-incorporates into a null verb have that is part of the syntactic-semantic structure of sin, and that (b) sin-PPs can be coerced into gradable properties as long as the bare noun is cumulative and homogeneous (divisive). Our proposal explains the differences between sin-(bare)-PPs and PPs headed by sin with a QP/DP complement, since in the latter there is neither coercion nor pseudo-incorporation.
References (23)
Borthen, Kaja. 2003. Norwegian Bare Singulars. Ph.D. dissertation, Norwegian University of Science and Technology.
Cinque, Guglielmo. 2010. The Syntax of Adjectives: A Comprehensive Study. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Dayal, Veneeta. 2011. “Hindi pseudoincorporation”. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 29:1.123–167.
Espinal, M. Teresa & Louise McNally. 2011. “Bare nominals and incorporating verbs in Spanish and Catalan”. Journal of Linguistics 47.87–128.
Etxeberria, Urtzi. 2005. Quantification and domain restriction in Basque. Ph.D. dissertation, Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea.
Grønn, Atle, Bert Le Bruyn, Henriëtte de Swart & Joost Zwarts. 2010. “Bare PPs across languages”. Ms., Utrecht University.
Kennedy, Christopher. 2007. “Vagueness and Grammar: The Semantics of Relative and Absolute Gradable Adjectives”. Linguistics and Philosophy 30:1.1–45.
Kennedy, Christopher & Louise McNally. 2005. “Scale Structure, Degree Modification, and the Semantics of Gradable Predicates”. Language 81.345–381.
Krifka, Manfred. 1986. Nominalreferenz und Zeitkonstitution. Zur Semantik von Massentermen, Individualtermen und Aspektklassen. Ph.D. dissertation, Universität München.
Landman, Fred. 2003. “Predicate-argument mismatches and the adjectival theory of indefinites”. From NP to DP, Volume 1: The syntax and semantics of noun phrases ed. by Martine Coene & Yves D’Hulst, 211–237. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Lawers, Peter & Dominique Willems. 2011. “Coercion: Definition and challenges, current approaches, and new trends”. Linguistics 49:6.1219–1235.
Le Bruyn, Bert, Henriëtte de Swart & Joost Zwarts. 2011. “Mass-count distinctions in bare PPs”. Ms., Utrecht University.
McIntyre, Andrew. 2006. “The interpretation of German datives and English have”. Datives and Other Cases ed. by Daniel P. Hole, André Meinunger & Werner Abraham, 185–211. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Oltra-Massuet, Isabel & Isabel Pérez-Jiménez. 2011. “La interacción contabilidad-gradabilidad en los SSPP escuetos”. Cuadernos de la ALFAL 3.138–158.
Rett, Jessica. 2008. Degree Modification in Natural Language. Ph.D. dissertation, Rutgers University.
Rothstein, Susan. 2010. “Counting and the mass/count distinction”. Journal of Semantics 27:3.343–397.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
