In:Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2011: Selected papers from 'Going Romance' Utrecht 2011
Edited by Sergio Baauw, Frank Drijkoningen, Luisa Meroni and Manuela Pinto
[Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 5] 2013
► pp. 249–266
L1 acquisition of noun ellipsis in French and in Dutch
Consequences for linguistic theory
Published online: 6 November 2013
https://doi.org/10.1075/rllt.5.12sle
https://doi.org/10.1075/rllt.5.12sle
In the literature several theoretical analyses of nominal ellipsis of various languages have been proposed. In this exploratory and comparative study the L1 French and Dutch acquisition of noun ellipsis is analyzed. The L1 data suggest that a theoretical analysis of the licensing mechanisms of nominal ellipsis should take the following observations into account. First, the acquisition of nominal ellipsis by French and Dutch children proceeds essentially in the same way, even though the adult languages differ. Second, as proposed in previous studies, not the presence of a determiner or inflection but the presence of an element with a partitive meaning seems to be a crucial factor in the licensing mechanism.
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Lobeck, Anne & Petra Sleeman
Sleeman, Petra & Tabea Ihsane
2017. The L2 acquisition of the French quantitative pronoun en by L1 learners of Dutch. In Cross-linguistic Influence in Bilingualism [Studies in Bilingualism, 52], ► pp. 303 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
