In:Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2011: Selected papers from 'Going Romance' Utrecht 2011
Edited by Sergio Baauw, Frank Drijkoningen, Luisa Meroni and Manuela Pinto
[Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 5] 2013
► pp. 193–216
Double object constructions in Spanish (and Catalan) revisited
Published online: 6 November 2013
https://doi.org/10.1075/rllt.5.10pin
https://doi.org/10.1075/rllt.5.10pin
The purpose of this paper is to provide evidence for a new view on Romance double object constructions (DOC). Against the general trend, we do not try to prove the existence of Romance DOC by comparing it to the well-known English-like dative alternation. Instead, we propose a new approach to Romance ditransitive constructions (DitrC) in general, focusing on European Spanish and Catalan data. Crucially, against Demonte (1995) and Cuervo (2003a,b) among others, we show that the presence of dative clitic doubling (DCD) is not a condition sine qua non for DOC, based on the assumption that the dative clitic may be optionally spelled out since there is silence variation (Sigurðsson 2004, Kayne 2005).
Cited by (4)
Cited by four other publications
Pineda, Anna
2014. What lies behind dative/accusative alternations in Romance. In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2012 [Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory, 6], ► pp. 123 ff.
Pineda, Anna
2018. Causativization of verbs of directed motion in Romance languages. In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 14 [Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory, 14], ► pp. 245 ff.
Pineda, Anna
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
