In:Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2011: Selected papers from 'Going Romance' Utrecht 2011
Edited by Sergio Baauw, Frank Drijkoningen, Luisa Meroni and Manuela Pinto
[Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 5] 2013
► pp. 17–58
The irregular forms of the Italian “Passato Remoto”
A synchronic and diachronic analysis
Published online: 6 November 2013
https://doi.org/10.1075/rllt.5.02cal
https://doi.org/10.1075/rllt.5.02cal
Many Italian verbs display complex alternations involving regular/irregular stem forms in the simple past tense, the so-called Passato Remoto. Vogel (1994), Pirelli and Battista (2000), Maiden (2005, 2010) among many others, including traditional neo-grammarian and structuralist accounts, assume that the alternations found in the irregular forms of the Passato Remoto must be accounted for in terms of memorized stem and ending alternants. In this paper, I will argue instead that the best synchronic and diachronic analysis of these alternations involves notions such as roots, abstract morphemes, Readjustment Rules and Impoverishment as expected by the Distributed Morphology (DM) model (Halle and Marantz 1993; Embick 2010; Embick and Marantz 2008). There is no need for memorized stem alternants to account for them.
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Pomino, Natascha & Eva-Maria Remberger
Milizia, Paolo
2019. Diachrony and morphological equilibrium. In Historical Linguistics 2015 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 348], ► pp. 149 ff.
Maiden, Martin
2018. New thoughts on an old puzzle. Revue Romane. Langue et littérature. International Journal of Romance Languages and Literatures 53:2 ► pp. 217 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
