In:Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2010: Selected papers from 'Going Romance' Leiden 2010
Edited by Irene Franco, Sara Lusini and Andrés Saab
[Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 4] 2012
► pp. 21–40
Contextual conditions on stem alternations
Illustrations from the Spanish conjugation
Published online: 12 December 2012
https://doi.org/10.1075/rllt.4.02emb
https://doi.org/10.1075/rllt.4.02emb
This paper looks at the analysis of stem alternations: a type of non-affixal morphological change. Alternations of this type are controversial because they look in principle like they can be analyzed either with distinct stem forms in memory, or with (morpho)phonological rules that derive alternants from a single underlying form. I argue that the locality conditions on contextual allomorphy provide an answer to part of this controversy. It is shown that certain stem alternations in Spanish verbs–diphthongization, as in e.g. pensar/pienso (‘think’); raising, as in e.g. pedir/pido (‘ask’) – cannot be treated with stored stems, because the alternations do not occur under the locality conditions that apply to contextual allomorphy. These alternations must be treated (morpho)phonologically. The implications of this view are explored; this includes a conjecture that reclassifies different types of “morpheme specific” alternations in the grammar. Keywords: allomorphy; alternations; morphology; Spanish; stems
Cited by (12)
Cited by 12 other publications
Christopoulos, Christos
Babineau, Mireille, Monica Barbir, Alex de Carvalho, Naomi Havron, Isabelle Dautriche & Anne Christophe
Paparounas, Lefteris
Lampitelli, Nicola, Paolo Roseano & Francesc Torres-Tamarit
Kratochvíl, František, David Moeljadi, Benidiktus Delpada, Václav Kratochvíl & Jiří Vomlel
MacDonald, Jonathan E. & Jeriel Melgares
Carlson, Matthew T. & Chip Gerfen
Bermúdez-Otero, Ricardo
2016. We do not need structuralist morphemes, but we do need constituent structure. In Morphological Metatheory [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 229], ► pp. 387 ff.
Merchant, Jason
Myler, Neil
Pitteroff, Marcel
Embick, David
2014. Phase cycles, φ-cycles, and phonological
(In)activity. In The Form of Structure, the Structure of Form [Language Faculty and Beyond, 12], ► pp. 271 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
