Cover not available

In:Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 16: Selected papers from the 47th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL), Newark, Delaware
Edited by Irene Vogel
[Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 16] 2020
► pp. 49–64

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

French causal puisque-clauses in the light of (not)-at-issueness

 | Harvard University
Published online: 21 August 2020
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/rllt.16.04cha
Abstract
This paper examines the discourse status of French causal clauses introduced by puisque ‘since’. Puisque-clauses are associated with two implications: the relation expressed by puisque and the content of their clause. Several diagnostics show that neither implication is at-issue and that the two implications belong to two different types of projective content (cf. Tonhauser et al. 2013). This is due to syntactic and lexical reasons: the relation expressed by puisque is not at-issue because puisque-clauses modify high (evidential and speech act) phrases that are not at-issue; the content of the puisque-clause is not at-issue because puisque is lexically factive, i.e. selects true facts. Puisque thus exemplifies an unrecognized type of double presuppositional trigger.
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • 1.Not-at-issueness of puisque-clauses
    • 1.1Answer to question under discussion
    • 1.2Challengeability
    • 1.3Non-focusability
  • 2.Two types of projective content
    • 2.1Projection
    • 2.2Strong contextual felicity constraint
    • 2.3Obligatory local effect
  • 3.Two sources of not-at-issueness
    • 3.1Syntactic source (the puisque-implication)
    • 3.2Lexical source (the B-implication)
  • 4.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgments
  • Notes
  • References
References (28)
References
Abrusan, Márta. 2016. “Presupposition Cancellation: Explaining the ‘Soft–Hard’ Trigger Distinction.” Natural Language Semantics 24: 165–202. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Amaral, Patrícia, Craige Roberts, and E. Allyn Smith. 2007. “Review of The Logic of Conventional Implicatures by Chris Potts.” Linguistics and Philosophy 30: 707–749. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Anand, Pranav, and Valentine Hacquard. 2013. “Epistemics and Attitudes.” Semantics and Pragmatics 6 (8): 1–59. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beaver, David. 2010. “Have you Noticed that Your Belly Button Lint Colour is Related to the Colour of Your Clothing?” In Presuppositions and Discourse: Essays Offered to Hans Kamp, ed. by R. Bäuerle et al., 65–99. Bingley: Emerald. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chierchia, Gennaro, and Sally McConnell-Ginet. 1990. Meaning and Grammar: An Introduction to Semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and Functional Heads: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ducrot, Oswald. 1983. “Puisque: essai de description polyphonique.” Revue Romane 24: 166–185.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Faller, Martina. 2002. “Semantics and Pragmatics of Evidentials in Cuzco Quecha.” PhD dissertation, Stanford University, Stanford.
Groupe λ-1. 1975. “Car, parce que, puisque.” Revue Romane 10: 248–280.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane, and Virginia Hill. 2013. “The Syntacticization of Discourse.” In Syntax and its Limits, ed. by Raffaella Folli, Robert Truswell, and Christina Sevdali, 370–390. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johnston, Michael James Robert. 1994. “The Syntax and Semantics of Adverbial Adjuncts.” PhD dissertation, University of California, Santa Cruz.
Karttunen, Lauri. 1974. “Presuppositions and Linguistic Context.” Theoretical Linguistics 1: 181–194. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. “Presupposition: What Went Wrong?.” In Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) 26, ed. by M. Moroney et al., 705–731. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika. 2006. “Decomposing Attitude Verbs.” Talk given at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
Krifka, Manfred. 2014. “Embedding Illocutionary Acts.” In Recursion: Complexity in Cognition, 59–87. Springer International Publishing. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Murray, Sarah. 2010. “Evidentiality and the Structure of Speech Acts”. PhD dissertation, Rutgers University, New Brunswick.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roberts, Craige. 1996. “Information Structure in Discourse: Towards an Integrated Formal Theory of Pragmatics.” Working Papers in Linguistics 49: Papers in Semantics. Ohio State University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rutherford, William. 1970. “Some Observations Concerning Subordinate Clauses in English.” Language 46: 97–115. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sæbø, Kjell Johan. 1991. “Causal and Purposive Clauses.” In Semantik – Semantics. Ein Internationales Handbuch zeitgenössischer Forschung – An International Handbook of Contemporary Research (HSK 6), ed. by Arnim von Stechow, and Dieter Wunderlich, 623–631. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. “Information Structure and Presupposition.” In The Oxford Handbook of Information Structure, Chapter 7.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scheffler, Tatjana. 2008. “Semantic Operators in Different Dimensions.” PhD dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Simons, Mandy, Judith Tonhauser, David Beaver, and Craige Roberts. 2010. “What Projects and Why.” In Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) 20, ed. by Nan Li, and David Lutz, 309–327. Ithaca, NY: CLC.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Speas, Margaret. 2004. “Evidentiality, Logophoricity and the Syntactic Representation of Pragmatic Features.” Lingua 114: 255–276. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Speas, Margaret, and Carol Tenny. 2003. “Configurational Properties of Point of View Roles.” In Asymmetry in Grammar, ed. by Anna Maria DiSciullo, 315–344. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tonhauser, Judith. 2012. “Diagnosing (not-)at-Issue Content.” Semantics of Under-represented Languages in the Americas (SULA) 6: 239–254.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tonhauser, Judith, David Beaver, Craige Roberts, and Mandy Simons. 2013. “Toward a Taxonomy of Projective Content.” Language 89 (1): 66–109. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
von Fintel, Kai. 2004. “Would You Believe it? The King of France is Back! Presuppositions and Truth Value Intuitions.” In Descriptions and Beyond, ed. by Marga Reimer, and Anne Bezuidenhout, 315–341. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
von Fintel, Kai, and Anthony S. Gillies. 2010. “Must… Stay… Strong!.” Natural Language Semantics 18 (4): 351–383. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (8)

Cited by eight other publications

Jędrzejowski, Łukasz
2025. On the synchrony and diachrony of causal jako-że-clauses in Polish. Linguistics Vanguard DOI logo
Zufferey, Sandrine & Liesbeth Degand
2025. Connectives in French. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Angantýsson, Ásgrímur & Łukasz Jędrzejowski
2023. Layers of subordinate clauses. In Micro- and Macro-variation of Causal Clauses [Studies in Language Companion Series, 231], ► pp. 184 ff. DOI logo
Haegeman, Liliane & Manuela Schönenberger
2023. The External Syntax of Conditional Clauses. In Conditionals [Palgrave Studies in Pragmatics, Language and Cognition, ], ► pp. 275 ff. DOI logo
Jędrzejowski, Łukasz & Constanze Fleczoreck
2023. Adverbial clauses and their variation. In Micro- and Macro-variation of Causal Clauses [Studies in Language Companion Series, 231], ► pp. 15 ff. DOI logo
Schönenberger, Manuela & Liliane Haegeman
2023. English rationale since and a reassessment of the typology of adverbial clauses. In Micro- and Macro-variation of Causal Clauses [Studies in Language Companion Series, 231], ► pp. 129 ff. DOI logo
BADAN, LINDA & LILIANE HAEGEMAN
2022. The syntax of peripheral adverbial clauses. Journal of Linguistics 58:4 ► pp. 697 ff. DOI logo
Charnavel, Isabelle
2019. Point of view on causal clauses. In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 15 [Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory, 15], ► pp. 93 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue