Cover not available

In:Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 15: Selected papers from 'Going Romance' 30, Frankfurt
Edited by Ingo Feldhausen, Martin Elsig, Imme Kuchenbrandt and Mareike Neuhaus
[Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 15] 2019
► pp. 219–236

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Chapter 11
Postverbal subject positions in ‘semi-finite’ clauses in Southern Italo-Romance and Sardinian

ORCiD logo with link | University of Cambridge
Published online: 9 October 2019
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/rllt.15.11gro
Abstract
Both Sardinian inflected infinitives on the one hand and Southern Calabrese and Salentino subjunctive complement clauses on the other can be considered semi-finite since, among other things, they are marked for person and number agreement with the subject, as finite clauses, but lack tense marking, on a par with non-finite clauses. These clauses all present VOS as the unmarked word order and allow VSO under specific pragmatic conditions. On the basis of a series of syntactic tests, this paper shows that these orders are derived via remnant VP-movement rather than object shift. Furthermore, it is argued that these varieties, although they allow for VSO, do not form an exception to Gallego’s (2013) generalization on VOS/VSO in Romance.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Inflected infinitives in Sardinian
  • 3.Finite complementation in extreme Southern Italian dialects
  • 4.Subjects in semi-finite clauses: An overview
  • 5.Analysis
    • 5.1Deriving VOS in Romance
    • 5.2Object shift
      • 5.2.1Ne-extraction
      • 5.2.2Binding
      • 5.2.3Specificity
      • 5.2.4Participle agreement
      • 5.2.5Other problems with object shift account
    • 5.3Right-dislocation
    • 5.4Conclusions
  • 6.A note on VSO
  • 7.Conclusions and questions for further research
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (40)
References
Alexiadou, Artemis & Elena Anagnostopoulou. 2001. The subject-in-situ generalization and the role of case in driving computations. Linguistic inquiry 32(2). 193–231. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Belletti, Adriana. 2001. Inversion as focalization. In Aafje Hulk & Yves D’Hulst (eds.), Subject inversion in Romance and the theory of Universal Grammar, 60–90. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004. Aspects of the low IP area. In Luigi Rizzi (ed.), The structure of CP and IP (The Cartography of Syntactic Structures 2), 16–51. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Belletti, Adriana & Ur Shlonsky. 1995. The order of verbal complements: A comparative study. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 13(3). 489–526. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bertocci, Davide & Federico Damonte. 2007. Distribuzione e morfologia dei congiuntivi in alcune varietà salentine. In Federico Damonte & Jacopo Garzonio (eds.), Studi sui dialetti della Puglia, 3–28. Padua: Unipress.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blasco Ferrer, Eduardo. 1988. Le parlate dell’Alta Ogliastra. Analisi dialettologica. Saggio di storia linguistica e culturale. (Studi di linguistica sarda 1). Cagliari: Edizioni della Torre.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blasco Ferrer, Eduardo, Michel Contini, Ines Loi Corvetto & Heinz Jürgen Wolf. 1988. Sardisch: Interne Sprachgeschichte, I: Grammatik/Evoluzione della grammatica; II: Lexik/Evoluzione del lessico; III: Onomastik/Evoluzione dell’onomastica. In Günter Holtus, Michael Metzeltin & Christian Schmitt (eds.), Lexikon der Romanistischen Linguistik, IV: Italienisch, Korsisch, Sardisch/Italiano, corso, sardo, 836–884. Niemeyer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Calabrese, Andrea. 1992. The lack of infinitival clauses in Salentino: a synchronic analysis. In Christiane Lauefer & Terrell A. Morgan (eds.), Theoretical Analyses in Romance Linguistics. Selected Papers from the Nineteenth Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL XIX) The Ohio State University, 21–23 April 1989, 267–267. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1993. The sentential complementation of Salentino: a study of a language without infinitival clauses. In Adriana Belletti (ed.), Syntactic Theory and the Dialects of Italy, 28–98. Turin: Rosenberg & Sellier.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cardinaletti, Anna. 1998. A second thought on Emarginazione: Destressing vs. Right Dislocation. In Guglielmo Cinque & Giampaolo Salvi (eds.), Current Studies in Italian Syntax. Essays Offered to Lorenzo Renzi, 117–35. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cecchetto, Carlo. 1999. A comparative analysis of left and right dislocation in Romance. Studia Linguistica 53(1). 40–67. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Costa, João. 2004. Subject positions and interfaces: the case of European Portuguese. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gallego, Ángel J. 2013. Object shift in Romance. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 31(2). 409–451. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Groothuis, Kim A. in prep. Reflexes of finiteness in Romance. University of Cambridge PhD thesis.
2017. Sardinian inflected infinitives and control. In Elena Buja, Stanca Măda & Mona Arhire (eds.), (De/Re)contextualisation. Structure, use, and meaning, 71–94. Braşov: Editura Universităţii Transilvania din Braşov.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2018. Empirical and Analytical Problems of the Romance Inflected Infinitive: The State of the Art. In Gabriela Pană Dindelegan, Adina Dragomirescu & Alexandru Nicolae (eds.), Comparative and Diachronic Perspectives on Romance Syntax, 289–324. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jones, Michael Allan. 1992. Infinitives with specified subjects in Sardinian. In Christiane Lauefer & James Morgan (eds.), Theoretical Analyses in Romance Linguistics: Selected papers from the Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages XIX, Ohio State University, April 21 23, 1989, 295–309. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1993. Sardinian syntax. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ledgeway, Adam. 1998. Variation in the Romance infinitive: the case of the Southern Calabrian inflected infinitive. Transactions of the Philological Society 96(1). 1–61. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2000. A comparative syntax of the dialects of Southern Italy: a minimalist approach. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. Greek disguised as Romance? The case of Southern Italy. In Mark Janse, Brian D. Joseph, Angela Ralli & Metin Bagriacik (eds.), MGDLT5. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Modern Greek Dialects and Linguistic Theory, 184–227. Patras: Laboratory of Greek dialects, University of Patras.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. Reconstructing Complementiser-drop in the Dialects of the Salento: A Syntactic or Phonological Phenomenon? In Mary Theresa Biberauer & George Walkenden (eds.), Syntax Over Time: Lexical, Morphological, and Information-structural Interactions, 146–62. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
López, Luis. 2009. A derivational syntax for information structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Loporcaro, Michele. 1997. Puglia and Salento. In Martin Maiden & Mair Parry (eds.), The dialects of Italy, 338–348. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Manzini, Maria Rita & Leonardo Maria Savoia. 2005. I dialetti italiani e romanci: morfosintassi generativa. 3 vols. Alessandria: Edizioni dell’Orso.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mensching, Guido. 2000. Infinitive constructions with specified subjects: A syntactic analysis of the Romance languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mensching, Guido & Eva-Maria Remberger. 2016. Sardinian. In Adam Ledgeway & Martin Maiden (eds.), The Oxford Guide to the Romance Languages, 270–291. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ordóñez, Francisco. 1998. Post-verbal asymmetries in Spanish. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 16(2). 313–345. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2000. The clausal structure of Spanish: a comparative study. New York: Garland.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pisano, Simone. 2008. L’infinito flesso in alcune varietà sarde moderne: coincidenza formale con l’imperfetto congiuntivo etimologico? Bollettino linguistico campano 13(1/2). 25–48.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Raposo, Eduardo. 1987. Case theory and Infl-to-Comp: The inflected infinitive in European Portuguese. Linguistic inquiry 18. 85–109.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1982. Issues in Italian syntax. Dordrecht: Foris. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roberts, Ian & Anna Roussou. 2003. Syntactic change: A minimalist approach to grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rohlfs, Gerhard. 1969. Grammatica storica della lingua italiana e dei suoi dialetti. Turin: Einaudi.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sitaridou, Ioanna. 2002. The Synchrony and Diachrony of Romance Infinitives with Nominative Subjects. University of Manchester.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Squillaci, Maria-Olimpia. 2016. When Greek meets Romance: a morphosyntactic analysis of language contact in Aspromonte. University of Cambridge PhD thesis.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taylor, Cameron. 2014. Aspects of clause structure in Nicotrese. A descriptive account. University of Cambridge PhD thesis.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vecchio, Paola. 2010. The distribution of the complementizers /ka/ and /ku/ in the north Salentino dialect of Francavilla Fontana (Brindisi). In Roberta D’Alessandro, Adam Ledgeway & Ian G. Roberts (eds.), Syntactic Variation: The Dialects of Italy, 312–322. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Virdis, Maurizio. 2015. Le proposizioni infinitive in sardo. In Maria Grazia Busà & Sara Gesuato (eds.), Lingue e contesti. Studi in onore di Alberto M. Mioni. Padova: CLEUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wagner, Max Leopold. 1951. La lingua sarda. Storia, spirito e forma. Bern: Francke.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Groothuis, Kim A.
2022. Non-finite Verb Movement in Romance. Probus 34:2 ► pp. 273 ff. DOI logo
Groothuis, Kim A.
2022. Non-finite Verb Movement in Romance. Probus 34:2 ► pp. 273 ff. DOI logo
Andriani, Luigi, Kim A. Groothuis & Giuseppina Silvestri
2020. Pathways of Grammaticalisation in Italo-Romance. Probus 32:2 ► pp. 327 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue