Cover not available

In:Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 15: Selected papers from 'Going Romance' 30, Frankfurt
Edited by Ingo Feldhausen, Martin Elsig, Imme Kuchenbrandt and Mareike Neuhaus
[Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 15] 2019
► pp. 135–156

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Chapter 7
Intonation of alternative constructions in French

Which cues allow distinguishing statements from questions?

 | Université de Nantes (Laboratoire de Linguistique LLING-UMR 6310)
 | Laboratoire de Linguistique Formelle (UMR 7110), CNRS-Université Paris Diderot
Published online: 9 October 2019
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/rllt.15.07del
Abstract
Alternative questions in French are described as ending by a falling contour, while a rising contour occurs on the non-final conjuncts. This configuration is very similar to the one observed in statements with a disjunction. The similarity at the phonological level raises the following questions: Are intonational contours equally implemented at a phonetic level in questions and statements? If not, what are the acoustic cues that allow for distinguishing the two sentence types? The aim of this study is to show that the phonetic implementation of the intonation contours at the end of both sentence-medial and sentence-final conjuncts differ in alternative questions and statements with a disjunction in French. This finding may deepen our understanding on the relation between intonation and meaning.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Previous studies on the prosody of alternative constructions
  • 3.The study
    • 3.1Materials and participants
    • 3.2Method
  • 4.Results
    • 4.1Utterance-final contour
      • 4.1.1Phonological analysis
      • 4.1.2Phonetic analysis of the falling contour
      • 4.1.3Interim discussion
    • 4.2Non utterance-final prosodic events
      • 4.2.1Intonational contours at the end of the non-final conjuncts
      • 4.2.2Phrasing: Final lengthening and pausing
      • 4.2.3Prosodic analysis of the matrix verb
      • 4.2.4Interim discussion
  • 5.Discussion and phonological analysis
    • 5.1The phrasing hypothesis
    • 5.2The tonal hypothesis
  • 6.Conclusion and outlook
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (30)
References
Mathieu Avanzi, Anne Lacheret-Dujour, and Bernard Victorri. 2008. “ANALOR. A Tool for Semi-Automatic Annotation of French Prosodic Structure”. In Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2008, Campinas, Brazil. pp. 119–122.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bartels, Christine. 1999. The intonation of English statements and questions. New York, NY: Garland Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beyssade, Claire, Elisabeth Delais-Roussarie, Jenny Doetjes, Jean-Marie Marandin, and Annie Rialland. 2004. “Prosody and information in French.” In Handbook of French Semantics, ed. by Francis Corblin, and Harriet de Swart, 477–500, Stanford: CSLI publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beyssade, Claire, and Jean-Marie Marandin. 2006. “The speech act assignment problem revisited: Disentangling Speaker’s commitment from Speaker’s call on Addressee.” In CSSP’s proceedings. [URL]
Biezma, Maria, and Kyle Rawlins. 2015. “Alternative Questions.” Language and Linguistics Compass 9: 450–468. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boersma, Paul. 2001. “Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer.” Glot International 5: 9/10: 341–345.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boersma, Paul, and David Weenink. 2017. Praat: doing phonetics by computer [Computer program]. Version 6.0.29, retrieved 24 May 2017 from [URL]
Delais-Roussarie, Elisabeth, and Ingo Feldhausen. 2014. Variation in Boundary Strength in French. In Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2014. Dublin, Mai 2014.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Delais-Roussarie, Elisabeth, Brechtje Post, Mathieu Avanzi, Caroline Buthke, Albert Di Cristo, Ingo Feldhausen, Sun-Ah Jun, Philippe Martin, Trudel Meisenburg, Annie Rialland, Rafèu Sichel-Bazin, and Hiyon Yoo. 2015. “Intonational phonology of French: Developing a ToBI system for French”. In Intonation in Romance, ed. by Sonia Frota, and Pilar Prieto, 63–100, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Delattre, Pierre. 1966. “Les 10 intonations de base du français [the ten basic intonations in French].” French Review 40/91:1–14.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Di Cristo, Albert. 2016. Les musiques du français contemporain: Essais sur l’accentuation, la métrique, le rythme, le phrasé prosodique et l’intonation du français contemporain. Berlin/ Boston: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Di Cristo, Albert, and Ludovic Jankowski. 1999. “Prosodic organization and phrasing after focus in French.” In Proceedings of the XIVth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS), San Francisco, USA, 1565–1568.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Féry, Caroline. 2001. “Focus and phrasing in French.” In Audiatur Vox Sapientiae. A Festschrift for Arnim von Stechow, ed. by Caroline Féry, and Werner Sternefeld, 153–181. Berlin: Akademie-VerlagGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldman, Jean-Philippe. 2011. “EasyAlign: an automatic phonetic alignment tool under Praat.” In Proceedings of INTERSPEECH 2011, Florence, Italy, August 27–31, ISCA Archive, [URL]
Hamblin, Charles L. 1973. Questions in Montague English. Foundations of Language 10: 41–53.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Han, Chung-Hye, and Maribel Romero. 2004. “Disjunction, Focus, and Scope.” Linguistic Inquiry 35.2: 179–217. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martin, Philippe. 1975a. “Analyse phonologique de la phrase française.” Linguistics, 146.35–67.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1975b. “Une grammaire de l’intonation de la phrase française”. Rapport d’Activité de l’institut de phonétique 9/1 et 9/2. 97–126 dans 9/1 et 77–96 dans 9/2. Institut de Phonétique: Université Libre de Bruxelles.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Michalsky, Jan. 2014. “Scaling of final rises in German questions and statements”. In Proceedings of the 7th Speech Prosody Conference, Dublin, Ireland: 978–982.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Michelas, Amandine, and Mariapaola D’Imperio. 2010. “Durational Cues and Prosodic Phrasing in French: Evidence for the Intermediate Phrase”. In Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2010, Chicago, [URL]
Petrone, Caterina, and Mariapaola D’Imperio. 2011. “From tones to tunes: Effects of the F0 prenuclear region in the perception of Neapolitan statements and questions”. In Sonia Frota, Gorka Elordieta, and Pilar Prieto (Eds.), Prosodic categories: Production, perception and comprehension (pp. 207–230). Berlin, Germany: Springer Verlag. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Petrone, Caterina, and Oliver Niebuhr. 2014. “On the intonation of German intonation questions: the role of the prenuclear region”. Language Speech 57 (1): 105–146. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pruitt, Kathryn. 2008. “Mapping prosody to interpretation in alternative questions”. Poster presented at the 21st CUNY conference on human sentence processing. [URL]
Pruitt, Kathryn, and Floris Roelofsen. 2013. “The interpretation of prosody in disjunctive questions.” Linguistic Inquiry 44(4): 632–650. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rossi, Mario, Daniel Hirst, and Albert Di Cristo. 1981. “Continuation et question.” In l’intonation: De l’Acoustique à la Sémantique, ed. by Mario Rossi, Albert Di Cristo, Daniel Hirst, Philippe Martin, and Yukihiro Nishinuma, 149–177, Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Selkirk, Elizabeth. 2011. “The Syntax-Phonology Interface.” In The Handbook of Phonological Theory, Second Edition, ed. by John Goldsmith, Jason Riggle, and Alan Yu, Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Torreira, Francisco, and Emma Valtersson. 2015. “Phonetic and visual cues to questionhood in French conversation. Phonetica 72: 20–42. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Truckenbrodt, Hubert. 2013. “An Analysis of prosodic F-effects in interrogatives: Prosody, syntax and semantics.” Lingua 124: 131–175. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Heuven, Vincent J., and Judith Haan. 2002. “Temporal distribution of interrogativity markers in Dutch: A perceptual study”. In Carlos Gussenhoven, and Natasha Warner (Eds.), Laboratory phonology 7 (pp. 61–86). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vion, Monique, and Annie Colas. 2006. “Pitch cues for the recognition of yes-no questions in French”. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 35: 427–445. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Cataldo, Violetta & Claudia Crocco
2023. The intonation of neighboring varieties. Sociolinguistica 37:1 ► pp. 41 ff. DOI logo
Beyssade, Claire & Elisabeth Delais-Roussarie
2022. The prosody of French rhetorical questions. Linguistics Vanguard 8:s2 ► pp. 277 ff. DOI logo
Druetta, Ruggero
2021. La structure alternative en français : un type interrogatif à part entière ?. Langue française N° 212:4 ► pp. 91 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue