Cover not available

In:Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 14: Selected papers from the 46th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL), Stony Brook, NY
Edited by Lori Repetti and Francisco Ordóñez
[Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 14] 2018
► pp. 325–340

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Chapter 19
Timing properties of (Brazilian) Portuguese and (European) Spanish

 | University of Delaware
 | University of Delaware
 | McGill University
Published online: 13 August 2018
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/rllt.14.19vog
Abstract
Linguistic rhythmic or timing categories, usually defined in terms of isochrony, remain controversial as a meaningful typology for classifying languages, despite decades of research. Romance languages offer an opportunity to address this question since closely related languages are proposed to be at different ends of the typology. We test two such languages: European Spanish (ES) and Brazilian Portuguese (BP). Instead of investigating isochrony per se, however, we examine the interface between timing and prominence properties. Since duration is associated with prominence, we test the hypothesis that syllable-timed languages (ES) do not alter duration to express prominence, while non-syllable-timed languages (BP) do. Comparisons of lexical and sentential prominence effects on duration support our hypothesis, confirming the proposed distinction between the rhythmic classes of the two languages.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Rhythmic typology and the classification of European Spanish and Brazilian Portuguese
    • 2.1Syllable- and stress-timing
    • 2.2Rhythmic classification of European Spanish and Brazilian Portuguese
  • 3.Experimental investigation of rhythm in European Spanish and Brazilian Portuguese
    • 3.1Methodology
    • 3.2Participants
    • 3.3Procedure
    • 3.4Stimuli
    • 3.5Analyses
  • 4.Results
    • 4.1Binary logistic regression analysis (BLRA) results
    • 4.2Duration
    • 4.3Duration ratios
  • 5.Discussion
    • 5.1Manifestation of prominence in European Spanish and Brazilian Portuguese
    • 5.2Measurements of relative duration
    • 5.3Rhythm as duration manipulation
  • 6.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
References (33)
References
Arvaniti, Amalia. 2009. “Rhythm, Timing and the Timing of Rhythm.” Phonetica 66 (1–2): 46–63.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barbosa, Plínio. 2000. “‘Syllable-timing in Brazilian Portuguese’: uma crítica a Roy Major [“Syllable-timing in Brazilian Portuguese”: a critic to Roy Major].” DELTA 16 (2): 369–402.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cantoni, Maria Mendes. 2013. “O acento no Português Brasileiro: uma abordagem experimental [Stress in Brazilian Portuguese: An experimental approach].” Ph.D. dissertation, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carrió i Font, Mar, and Antonio Ríos Mestre. 1991. “Compensatory Shortening in Spanish Spontaneous Speech.” In Proceedings of the Workshop on Phonetics and Phonology of Speaking Styles, ed. by Joaquim Llisterri, and Delors Poch, 1–5. Barcelona: ESCA.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dauer, Rebecca. 1983. “Stress-Timing and Syllable-Timing Reanalyzed.” Journal of Phonetics 11: 51–62.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1987. “Phonetic and Phonological Components of Language Rhythm.” In Proceedings of the 11th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, 447–450. Tallinn: Academy of Sciences of the Estonian S.S.R.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Delattre, Pierre. 1965. Comparing the Phonetic Features of English, German, Spanish and French. Heidelberg: Julius Groos.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1966. Studies in French and Comparative Phonetics. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dellwo, Volker. 2006. “Rhythm and Speech Rate: A Variation Coefficient for ∆C.” In Proceedings of the 38th Linguistic Colloquium, Budapest, ed. by Pawel Karnowski, and Imre Szigeti, 231–241. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frota, Sónia, and Pilar Prieto (eds.). 2015. Intonation in Romance. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frota, Sónia, and Marina Vigário. 2001. “On the Correlates of Rhythmic Distinctions: The European/Brazilian Portuguese Case.” Probus 13 (2): 247–275.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grabe, Esther, and Ee Ling Low. 2002. “Durational Variability in Speech and the Rhythm Class Hypothesis.” Papers in Laboratory Phonology 7: 515–546.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hayes, Bruce. 1995. Metrical Stress Theory: Principles and Case Studies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hoequist, Charles. 1983a. “Durational Correlates of Linguistic Rhythm Categories.” Phonetica 40 (1): 19–31.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1983b. “Syllable Duration in Stress-, Syllable- and Mora-Timed Languages.” Phonetica 40 (3): 203–237.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ladd, Robert. 1996. Intonational Phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lehiste, Ilse. 1973. “Rhythmic Units and Syntactic Units in Production and Perception.” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 54 (5): 1228–1234.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1979. “The Perception of Duration within Sequences of Four Intervals.” Journal of Phonetics 7 (4): 313–316.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Llisterri, Joaquim, María Machuca, Carme de la Mota, Montserrat Riera, and Antonio Ríos. 2003. “The Perception of Lexical Stress in Spanish.” In Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, ed. by Maria-Josep Solé, Daniel Recasens, and Joaquín Romero, 2023–2026. Barcelona: Causal Productions.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Low, Ling Ee, Esther Grabe, and Francis Nolan. 2000. “Quantitative Characterizations of Speech Rhythm: Syllable-Timing in Singapore English.” Language and Speech 43 (4): 377–401.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Major, Roy. 1985. “Stress and Rhythm in Brazilian Portuguese.” Language 61 (2): 259–282.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Massini-Cagliari, Gladis. 1992. Acento e ritmo [Stress and rhythm]. São Paulo: Contexto.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moraes, João Antônio de. 1998. “Intonation in Brazilian Portuguese.” In Intonation systems: A Survey of Twenty Languages, by Daniel Hirst, and Albert Di Cristo, 179–194. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Navarro Tomás, Tomás. 1916. “Cantidad de las vocales acentuadas [The quantity of stressed vowels].” Revista de Filología Española III: 387–408.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ortega-Llebaria, Marta. 2006. “Phonetic Cues to Stress and Accent in Spanish.” In Selected Proceedings of the 2nd Conference on Laboratory Approaches to Spanish Phonetics and Phonology, ed. by Manuel Díaz-Campos, 104–118. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ortega-Llebaria, Marta, and Pilar Prieto. 2011. “Acoustic Correlates of Stress in Central Catalan and Castilian Spanish.” Language and Speech 54 (1): 1–25..Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Parkinson, Stephen. 1988. “Portuguese.” In The Romance Languages, ed. by Martin Harris, and Nigel Vincent, 131–169. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pike, Kenneth. 1972 [1945]. “The Intonation of American English.” In Intonation, by Dwight Le Merton Bolinger, 53–83. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Prieto, Pilar, Maria del Mar Vanrell, Lluïsa Astruc, Elinor Payne, and Brechtje Post. 2012. “Phonotactic and Phrasal Properties of Speech Rhythm. Evidence from Catalan, English, and Spanish.” Speech Communication 54 (6): 681–702.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ramus, Franck, Emmanuel Dupoux, and Jacques Mehler. 2003. “The Psychological Reality of Rhythm Classes: Perceptual Studies.” In Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, ed. by Maria-Josep Solé, Daniel Recasens, and Joaquín Romero, 337–342. Barcelona: Causal Productions.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ramus, Franck, and Jacques Mehler. 1999. “Language Identification with Suprasegmental Cues: A Study Based on Speech Resynthesis.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 105 (1): 512–521.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ramus, Franck, Marina Nespor, and Jacques Mehler. 1999. “Correlates of Linguistic Rhythm in the Speech Signal.” Cognition 73 (3): 265–292.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vogel, Irene, Angeliki Athanasopoulou, and Nadya Pincus. 2016. “Prominence, Contrast and the Functional Load Hypothesis: An Acoustic Investigation.” In Dimensions of Phonological Stress, ed. by Jeffrey Heinz, Rob Goedemans, and Harry van der Hulst, 123–167. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Garcia, Guilherme D
2020. Language transfer and positional bias in English stress. Second Language Research 36:4 ► pp. 445 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue