In:Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 13: Selected papers from ‘Going Romance’ 29, Nijmegen
Edited by Janine Berns, Haike Jacobs and Dominique Nouveau
[Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 13] 2018
► pp. 339–340
Subject index
Published online: 13 July 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/rllt.13.ind1
https://doi.org/10.1075/rllt.13.ind1
A
- absolute adjectives2, 111–112 , 122–124
- acquisition3, 8, 143–144 , 147, 149, 154, 279, 281–282 , 284–285 , 292–294
- additive2, 41, 127–130 , 132–140
- adjective placement 143–147 , 153–155
- adjunct 31–32 ,34, 101–102 , 117, 119, 184–185 , 187, 189–190 , 267, 270, 275, 305–310
- agentivity 210–211 , 221
- Aktionsart117, 177, 181, 185, 191, 193, 195–196 , 202
- anaphoricity65
- aspectual3, 127–129 , 132–140 , 178–182 , 186, 188, 190–197 , 201, 203–204 , 209, 211–212 , 218, 222, 299–300 , 304
- atelic116, 123, 181, 184–185 , 187–191 , 211
- attributive adjective143, 145–146
B
- Bare Plurals8, 16
- bilingual children2, 143–145 , 150–155
- binominal sendos 12–14
- biscuit conditional1, 41, 45–47 , 50
- boundedness3, 245–246 , 248–254 , 257
C
- Canonical Quantification (CQ)259
- cardinal3, 245–246 , 248–254 , 257
- Central Coincidence domain3, 177, 191, 201
- child directed speech149
- Common Ground (CG)25, 36, 47, 56
- comparative quantifier 259–260 , 268
- Comparison At a Distance (CAD) 259–260
- Complementiser/complementizer2, 68, 70–71 , 75–78 , 80–82 , 84–91 , 138, 317
- concessive1, 41–42 , 44, 49
- condition C effects12
- conditional1, 24, 41, 44–48 , 50–51 , 58, 249
- conjunctive2, 75, 77, 80, 82–87 , 89–91
- copula 3–4 , 154, 177–182 , 184–186 , 188, 191–196 , 198–204 , 209, 212–213 , 297–302 , 304–306 , 311–312 , 318
- CT-marking47
D
- dative clitic le 1, 5–6 , 8–9 , 11–14 , 16–19
- declarative31, 76, 78, 80–85 , 186, 280, 284–285 , 328
- definiteness233
- degree modifier3, 114, 225–226 , 228, 232, 236, 239–240
- dependency marker3, 245, 247, 249, 257
- dislocation154, 322
- Double Object Construction 9–10
E
- echo-questions35
- epistemic _1, 4142, 44, 47, 49–52 , 55, 212, 306
- estar 3, 87, 177–204 , 209–222 , 300, 306
- estarse 3, 209–222
- exclamative2, 75, 77–79 , 81–87 , 89–91 , 234
- external possession2, 95–97 , 103, 107–108
F
- focalizer 127–128 , 133–135 , 137
- focus marker4, 139, 297–298 , 301–302 , 304, 312
- ForceP2, 55, 57, 61, 68–72 , 88, 324–325
G
- givenness1, 21, 23–26 , 28
I
- illocutionary complementiser –61, 75–78 , 80, 8284, 86–88 , 90–91
- immersion4, 279–295
- impoverishment 5–8 , 18–19
- inchoative3, 185, 195–196 , 209, 211–212 , 217–218 , 220–222
- Information Focus322, 330
L
- L2 3–4 , 7, 160, 162, 279–285 , 289, 292–295
- L2 status factor3, 279–283 , 285, 292–295
- L3 3–4 , 279–282 , 284–285 , 292–295
- left periphery68, 70–71 , 77–78 , 86–88 , 90–91 , 128, 303, 315, 319, 321–323 , 326, 328, 330–331
- licensing13, 18, 29, 34, 50, 70–71 , 80, 82, 84, 91, 107, 202, 252, 269, 330–331
- l-syntax/l-syntactic3, 177, 180–181 , 192–193 , 195
M
- mass noun226, 231, 234–235 , 240, 253
- maximizer 225–228 , 230, 236–237 , 240
- minority variety160
- MLU150, 154
- modifier3, 52, 112, 114, 216–217 , 225–228 , 230, 232–233 , 236, 239–240
- monotonicity constraint3, 245–246
- M-Word 7–8 , 14
N
- negative presupposition2, 55–56 , 60, 63–67 , 71
- NegPresuppositionalP2, 55, 57, 68–72
- nominal domain3, 225–226 , 228, 230, 232, 241
- null anaphor2, 95–96 , 99, 103–104 , 107
O
- operator 1–2 , 41, 44, 55, 57, 61, 68–72 , 84, 106, 129, 131, 133–134 , 247, 249–250 , 254–255 , 263, 266, 298
P
- partitive255
- PathP2, 111–124
- Person Case Constraint effects10
- PolarityP57, 66–71
- positive degree adjectives2, 111–112
- positive presupposition57, 63–66
- possessor2, 95–107 , 233, 238–239
- possessum2, 95–96 , 98–99 , 101–103 , 107, 233
- predicate31, 33, 80, 106, 113, 117, 123–124 , 133, 177–180 , 184–204 , 210–221 , 227, 231, 233, 237, 240, 301, 305–308
- Principle B 14–17
Q
- Quantification At a Distance (QAD)3, 259–261 , 263–264 , 267
- quantifier 12– 13 , 18, 133, 231–233 , 237, 247, 250, 256, 259–264 , 266, 268, 271, 273, 275–276 , 280, 284–285
- Question Under Discussion (QUD) discourse model22, 29–34 , 45, 47
R
- reflexive se 14, 16–18
- relative adjectives 122–123
- Relevance30, 37, 47, 49–50
- restrictor 259–260 , 263–264
- rhythm/rhythmic 2–3 , 159–167 , 170–172
- root sentence280, 284
S
- satellite-framed languages124
- scalar44, 50–52 , 112–113 , 118, 124, 189, 229
- scalarity3, 124, 225, 241
- scale structure225, 227, 230
- ScaleP112, 118–119 , 123
- Scope128, 131,
134–136
,
138–139
,
143–144
, 183, 189, 247,
261–262
,
264–266
, 300
- narrow scope247, 257
- wide scope 135–136 , 247
- ser 3–4 , 177–182 , 184–187 , 189, 191–198 , 200–204 , 297–312
- social factors159
- speech act2, 36, 75, 77–78 , 84, 86, 91
- Speech Act Phrase (SAP)1, 5–6 , 8–9 , 11–19
- spurious clitic se 1, 5–6 , 8–9 , 11–19
- stative3, 117, 179, 181–182
- stress group2, 159–161 , 163, 165, 168–170
- strong resultative adjectives113
- style 159–160 , 162–164 , 166–172
- syllable2, 159–165 , 167–172
T
- TAM contexts1, 56–58 , 71
- telicity/telic verbs3, 115–116 , 177–178 , 180–182 , 184–193 , 195, 209, 211, 214–221
- thematic role251, 255–256
- Topic Acceptability Scale321
- typology 2–3 , 107, 159–161 , 163–165 , 167, 172, 177, 180, 192, 195, 227, 315–317 , 323, 325, 330–331
V
- V2-rule/V24, 135, 138, 280–281 , 284, 293–295 , 315–331
- Vehicle Change 15–17
- verb-framed languages124
- V-to-C 284–293 , 295, 317, 321, 323
- V-to-T 284–293 , 295, 316
W
- weak cross-over repairs11
- wh-fronted questions (WFQ) 21–29 , 32, 34–37
- wh-in-situ questions (WIQ)1, 21–29 , 31–37
