In:Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 13: Selected papers from ‘Going Romance’ 29, Nijmegen
Edited by Janine Berns, Haike Jacobs and Dominique Nouveau
[Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 13] 2018
► pp. 209–224
Spanish estarse is not only agentive, but also inchoative
Published online: 13 July 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/rllt.13.13mar
https://doi.org/10.1075/rllt.13.13mar
This article explores the properties of constructions involving the stage
level copula estar with the pronominal form
se, which has been argued to encode an agentive
component lacking from the non se-marked form. While several previous
studies have argued that estarse constructions involve a
dynamic and telic component similar to an achievement, the goal of this
contribution is to show that estarse is essentially
stative, lacking all kinds of dynamicity and telicity, and should be
analysed as an inchoative state, that is, a state that encodes its onset,
but not the culmination of the transition preceding it. We show that this
analysis overcomes the problems of previous proposals with respect to the
temporal and aspectual behaviour of estarse
constructions.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Bringing aspect under control
- 2.1The stative denotation of estarse
- 2.1.1Tests examined in Gómez & García (2013)
- 2.1.2Additional tests on the stativity of estarse
- 2.2 Estarse does not entail telicity
- 2.3 Estarse is not so punctual
- 2.4The inchoative denotation of estarse
- 2.1The stative denotation of estarse
- 3.Analysis: estarse denotes an inchoative state
- 3.1Previous analyses
- 3.2Inchoative states
- 3.2.1 Bar-el (2005)
- 3.2.2Right and left boundaries
- 4.Conclusion
Acknowledgments Notes References
References (23)
Bar-el, Leora. 2005. Aspectual Distinctions in SKWXWU7MESH. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of British Columbia.
Choi, Jiyoung. 2015. “On the Universality of Aspectual Classes: Inchoative States in Korean”. In Cahiers Chronos 27, ed. by Emmanuelle Labeau and Qiaochao Zhang, 123–135.
Chung, Kyung-Sook. 2005. Space in Tense: The Interpretation of Tense, Aspect, Evidentiality, and Speech Act in Korean. Ph.D. Dissertation, Simon Fraser University.
De Miguel, Elena. 1999. “El aspecto léxico”. In Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, ed. by Ignacio Bosque and Violeta Demonte, 2971–3060. Madrid: Espasa Calpe.
De Miguel, Elena, and Marina Fernández Lagunilla. 2000. “El operador aspectual se.” Revista Española de Lingüística 30 (1): 13–43.
García, Luis, and Diana Gómez. 2015. “More than a Copula: Complex Predicates with estar and the Clitic se
”. In
New Perspectives on the Study of Ser & Estar, ed. by Isabel Pérez Jiménez, Manuel Leonetti and Silvia Gumiel, 23–50. Amsterdam, John Benjamins.
Gómez, Diana, and Luis García. 2013. “Estados controlados” In Actas del X Congreso de Lingüística General, ed. by J.F. Val Álvaro et al., 335–346. Universidad de Zaragoza.
Jiménez Fernández, Ángel, and Mercedes Tubino. 2014. “Variación sintáctica en la causativización léxica”. Revista española de lingüística, 44 (1): 7–37.
Kiyota, Masaru. 2008. Situation Aspect and Viewpoint Aspect: From Salish to Japanese. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of British Columbia.
Lee, Eun Hee. 2006. “Stative Progressives in Korean and English”. Journal of Pragmatics 38: 695–717.
Maienborn, Claudia. 2005. On the Limits of the Davidsonian Approach: The Case of Copula Sentences. Theoretical Linguistics 31 (3): 275–316.
Marín, Rafael. 2016. “Ser y estar”. In Enciclopedia de lingüística hispánica vol. II, ed. by Javier Gutiérrez-Rexach, 13–24. London: Routledge.
Marín, Rafael, and Louise McNally. 2005. “The Aktionsart of Spanish Reflexive Psychological Verbs”. Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 9: 212–225.
. 2011. Inchoativity, Change of State and Telicity. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 29 (2): 467–502.
Moens, Marc, and Mark Steedman. 1988. “Temporal Ontology and Temporal Reference”. Computational Linguistics 14: 15–28.
Morimoto, Yuko. 2008. “Me estuve quieto: el concepto de estado y el llamado se aspectual”. In Actas del XXXVII Simposio Internacional de la Sociedad Española de Lingüística, ed. by Inés Olza Moreno, Manuel Casado Velarde and Ramón González Ruiz, 591–599. Pamplona: Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Navarra.
. 2011. “El control en los predicados estativos”. In Estados y estatividad, ed. by Ángeles Carrasco Gutiérrez, 122–141. Muenchen: LINCOM.
Piñón, Christopher. 1997. “Achievements in an Event Semantics”. In Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory 7, ed. by A. Lawson, and E. Cho, 273–296. Ithaca (NY): CLC Publications.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
