In:Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 13: Selected papers from ‘Going Romance’ 29, Nijmegen
Edited by Janine Berns, Haike Jacobs and Dominique Nouveau
[Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 13] 2018
► pp. 95–110
External possession in Brazilian Portuguese
Null possessors as null anaphors
Published online: 13 July 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/rllt.13.07due
https://doi.org/10.1075/rllt.13.07due
External possession, a phenomenon where the DP interpreted as possessor is a syntactic dependent of the clause, appearing outside a possessive structure, is instantiated in a variety of ways cross-linguistically. A number of recent proposals have understood these constructions to involve A-movement operations. This paper presents evidence that a movement approach to external possession in Brazilian Portuguese (BP) makes incorrect predictions about its locality restrictions, including island effects and sensitivity to discourse factors. I provide an analysis in which the dependency between possessor and possessum is mediated by null anaphors, which are also shown to display logophoric behavior.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction: the phenomenon and issues
- 2.External possession in Brazilian Portuguese
- 2.1Discourse antecedents
- 2.2Lack of c-command
- 2.3Intervention effects
- 2.4Island effects: the view from relative clauses
- 3.Null possessors as null anaphors: binding and logophoricity
- 4.Conclusion
Acknowledgments Notes References
References (16)
Borer, Hagit, and Yael Grodzinsky. 1986. “Syntactic vs. Lexical Cliticization: The Case of Hebrew Dative Clitics”. In Syntax and Semantics 19: The syntax of pronominal clitics, ed.by Hagit Borer. 175–217. San Diego: Academic Press.
Charnavel, Isabelle, and Dominique Sportiche. 2016. “Anaphor Binding: What French Inanimate Anaphors Show”. Linguistic Inquiry 47 (1): 35–87.
Clements, George N. 1975. “The Logophoric Pronoun in Ewe: Its Role in Discourse”. Journal of West African languages 2: 141–177.
Duek, Karen. 2015. “Null Anaphors and Logophoricity in External Possession in Brazilian Portuguese”. Ms, University of California, Santa Cruz.
Floripi, Simone, and Jairo Nunes. 2009. “Movement and Resumption in Null Possessor Constructions in Brazilian Portuguese”. In Minimalist Essays on Brazilian Portuguese Syntax, ed. by Jairo Nunes, 51–68. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Guéron, Jacqueline. 1985. “Inalienable Possession, PRO-inclusion and Lexical Chains”. In Grammatical Representation, ed. by Jacqueline Guéron, Hans G. Obenauer and Jean-Yves Pollock, 43–86. Dordrecht: Foris.
Hagège, Claude. 1974. “Les pronoms logophoriques”. Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris 69: 287–310
Lee-Schoenfeld, Vera. 2006. “German Possessor Datives: Raised and Affected”. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 9: 101–142.
Pollard, Carl, and Ivan A. Sag. 1992. “Anaphors in English and the Scope of Binding Theory”. Linguistic Inquiry: 261–303.
Reinhart, Tanya, and Eric Reuland. 1991. “Anaphors and Logophors: an Argument Structure Perspective.” In Long distance anaphora. ed. by Jan Koster and Eric Reuland, 283–321. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rodrigues, Cilene. 2010. “Possessor Raising through Thematic Positions.” In Movement theory Control, ed. by Norbert Hornstein and Maria Polinsky, 119–146. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.