Cover not available

In:Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 12: Selected papers from the 45th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL), Campinas, Brazil
Edited by Ruth E.V. Lopes, Juanito Ornelas de Avelar and Sonia M. L. Cyrino
[Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 12] 2017
► pp. 185–198

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Chapter 12
Epistemic uses of the verb decir in La Paz Spanish

Digamos and dice

 | Department of Romance Studies and Classics, Stockholm University
Published online: 19 October 2017
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/rllt.12.12qua
Abstract
This paper explores semantic extensions and pragmatic functions of two evidential forms found in La Paz Spanish, digamos ‘let’s say’ and dice ‘s/he says’. Both forms are inflected forms of the verb decir ‘to say’. The form dice ‘s/he says’ has the function of a reported evidential form, conforming to results from previous studies (Babel 2009; Olbertz 2007; Travis 2006; Laprade 1981), while the form digamos is used according to a previously unnoticed function of an inferential evidential.
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • Evidentiality, modality and stance
  • The evidential marker dizque in American Spanish
  • Materials, participants and method
  • The analysis of dice
    • Functions of dice
    • Syntactic placement, semantic scope and pragmatic implications of dice
  • The analysis of digamos
    • Functions of digamos
    • Syntactic placement, semantic scope and pragmatic features of digamos
  • Discussion
  • Notes
  • References
References (23)
References
Aikhenvald, Alexandra. 2004. Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Albó, Xavier (ed.). 1988. Raices de América: el mundo Aymara. Madrid: Alianza editorial.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Babel, Anna. 2009. “Dizque evidentiality and stance in Valley Spanish.” Language in Society 38: 487–511. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Briz, Antonio and Grupo Val.Es.Co. 2000. ¿Cómo se comenta un texto coloquial?. Barcelona: Ariel.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace. 1986. “Evidentiality in English Conversation and Academic Writing.” In Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology, ed. by Wallace Chafe and Johanna Nichols, 261–272.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(ed). 1980. The pear stories: Cognitive, cultural, and linguistic aspects of narrative production. Norwood: Ablex.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clift, Rebecca. 2006. “Indexing Stance: reported speech as an interactional evidential.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 10(5): 569–595. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cornillie, Bert. 2007. “The continuum between lexical and grammatical evidentiality: a functional analysis of Spanish parecer .” Rivista di Linguistica 19(1): 109–128.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cruschina, Silvio, and Eva-Maria Remberger. 2008. “Hearsay and reported speech: evidentiality in Romance.” Rivista di Grammatica Generativa 33: 95–116.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grande Alija, Francisco Javier. 2010. “Usos metadiscursivos de las formas exhortativas no digamos, digamos y que digamos .” Onomázein 21 (1): 97–131.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hengeveld, Kees, and Marize M. Dall’Aglio Hattnher. 2015. “Four types of evidentiality in the native languages of Brazil.” Linguistics 53 (3): 479–524. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kockelman, Paul. 2004. “Stance and Subjectivity.” Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 14(2): 127–150. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Laprade, Richard. 1981. “Some cases of Aimara influence on La Paz Spanish.” In Aimara language in its social and cultural context, ed. by Martha J. Hardman, 18–29. Gainesville (FL): University presses of Florida.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Olbertz, Hella. 2007. “Dizque in Mexican Spanish: the subjectification of reportative meaning.” Rivista di Lingüística 19 (1): 151–172.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Palmer, Frank R. 1986. Mood and modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Plungian, Vladimir. 2001. “The place of evidentiality within the universal grammatical space.” Journal of Pragmatics 33: 349–357. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Portolés, José. 2001. Marcadores del discurso. Barcelona: Ariel.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
REAL ACADEMIA ESPAÑOLA: banco de datos (CORDE) 2015 [on-line]. Corpus Diacrónico del Español. [URL] (18-03-2015)
San Roque, Lila, Lawren Gawne, Darja Hoenigman, Julia Colleen Miller, Alan Rumsey, Stef Spronck, Alice Carroll, and Nicholas Evans. 2012. “Getting the Story Straight: Language Fieldwork Using a Narrative Problem-Solving Task.” Language Documentation & Conservation 6: 135–174.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Squartini, Mario. 2001. “The internal structure of evidentiality in Romance.” Studies in Language 25 (2): 297–334. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Travis, Catherine. 2006. “Dizque: a Colombian evidentiality strategy.” Linguistics 44 (6): 1269–1297. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue