References (39)
References
Andreasson, Helene N., and Kathrine Asla Østby. 2014. Une étude inter-variété des voyelles moyennes antérieures arrondies en français: une approche phonético-phonologique. In La phonologie du français: Norms, périphéries, modélisation ed. by Jacques Durand, Gjert Kristofferson & Bernard Laks, 35–81. Paris: Presses Universitaires de Paris Ouest.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bazylko, Sławomir. 1981. “Le statut de [ǝ] dans le système phonématique du français contemporain et quelques questions connexes.” La linguistique 17 (1): 91–101.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boersma, Paul, and David Weenink. 2013. Praat: doing phonetics by computer [Computer program]. Version 5.3.52, accessed December 14, 2013, [URL]
Bounds, Paulina, Naomi Palosaari, and William A. Kretzschmar, Jr. 2011. Issues in Using Legacy Data.” In Sociophonetics: A Student’s Guide, ed. by Marianna Di Paolo and Malcah Yaeger-Dror, 46–57. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bullock, Barbara E., and Chip Gerfen. 2004a. “Phonological Convergence in a Contracting Language Variety.” Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 7 (2): 95–104. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004b. “Frenchville French: A Case Study in Phonological Attrition.” International Journal of Bilingualism 8 (3): 303–320. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. “The Preservation of Schwa in the Converging Phonological System of Frenchville (PA) French.” Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 8 (2): 117–130. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bürki, Audrey, Fougeron, Cécile, Gendrot, Cedric, and Ulrich H. Frauenfelder. 2011. “Phonetic Reduction Versus Phonological Deletion of French Schwa: Some Methodological Issues.” Journal of Phonetics 39: 279–288. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Colantoni, Laura, and Jeffrey Steele. 2011. “Synchronic Evidence of a Diachronic Change: Voicing and Duration in French and Spanish Stop–Liquid Clusters.” The Canadian Journal of Linguistics / La revue canadienne de linguistique 56 (2): 147–177. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coveney, Aidan. 2001. The Sounds of Contemporary French: Articulation and Diversity. Exeter: Elm Bank Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Delattre, Pierre. 1966. Studies in French and Comparative Phonetics. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Di Paolo, Marianna, and Alice Faber. 1990. “Phonation Differences and the Phonetic Content of the Tense-Lax Contrast in Utah English.” Language Variation and Change 2 (2): 155–204. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Faber, Alice, and Marianna Di Paolo. 1995. “The Discriminability of Nearly Merged Sounds”. Language Variation and Change 7: 35–78. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fougeron, Cécile, Cedric Gendrot, and Audrey Bürki. 2007. “On the Phonetic Identity of French Schwa Compared to /ø/ and /œ/.” Paper presented at the International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Saarbrücken, Germany, August 6–10, 2007.
Hall, Kathleen C., and Elizabeth V. Hume. 2013. “Perceptual Confusability of French Vowels.” Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics 19: 060113. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hansen, Anita Berit. 1994. “Étude du E caduc: stabilisation en cours et variations lexicales.” Journal of French Language Studies 4: 25–54. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. “A Study of Young Parisian Speech: Some Trends in Pronunciation.” In Phonological Variation in French: Illustrations from Three Continents, ed. by Randall Scott Gess, Chantal Lyche, and Trudel Meisenburg, 151–172. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hickey, Raymond. 2004. “Mergers, Near-Mergers and Phonological Interpretation.” In New Perspectives on English Historical Linguistics, ed. by Christian J. Kay, Carole Hough, and Irené Wotherspoon, 125–137. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Janson, Tore, and Richard Schulman. 1983. “Non-distinctive Features and Their Use.” Journal of Linguistics 19 (2): 321–336. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1994. Principles of Linguistic Change. Volume 1: Internal Factors. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. “Transmission and Diffusion.” Language 83 (2): 344–387. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Labov, William, Mark Karen, and Corey Miller. 1991. “Near-mergers and the Suspension of Phonemic Contrast.” Language Variation and Change 3 (1): 33–74. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Labov, William, Malcah Yaeger, and Richard Steiner. 1972. A Quantitative Study of Sound Change in Progress (Vol. 1). Philadelphia: The U.S. Regional Survey.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Léon, Pierre. 2007. Phonétisme et pronunciations du français, 5e édition. Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Malécot, André. 1974. “The Frequency of Occurrence of Phonemes and Consonant Clusters in French.” Phonetics 29: 158–170. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Malécot, André, and Gérard Chollet. 1977. “The Acoustic Status of the Mute-e in French”. Phonetica 34 (1): 19–30. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Manaster Ramer, Alexis. 1996. “A Letter from an Incompletely Neutral Phonologist.” Journal of Phonetics 24 (4): 477–489. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martinet, André. 1972. “La nature phonologique d’e caduc.” In Papers in Linguistics and Phonetics to the Memory of Pierre Delattre, ed. by Albert Valdman, 393–399. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mielke, Jeff. 2013. “Ultrasound and Corpus Study of a Change from Below: Vowel Rhoticity in Canadian French.” University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 19 (2): 141–150.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Morin, Yves-Charles. 1978. “The Status of Mute ‘e’.” Studies in French Linguistics 1 (2): 79–140.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2000. “Le français de référence et les normes de pronunciation.” Cahiers de l’Institut de Linguistique de Louvain 26 (1): 91–135. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mougeon, Françoise, and Dorin Uritescu. 2006. “Les derniers Français de Frenchville.” La Linguistique 42 (1): 115–128. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tranel, Bernard. 1987. “French Schwa and Nonlinear Phonology.” Linguistics 25: 845–866. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Valdman, Albert. 1979. “Créolisation, français populaire et le parler des isolats francophones d’Amérique du Nord.” In Le français hors de France, ed. by Albert Valdman, 181–197. Paris: Champion.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Verluyten, S. Paul. 1988. La phonologie du schwa français. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Walker, Douglas C. 1993. “Schwa and /œ/ in French.” Canadian Journal of Linguistics 38 (1): 43–64.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Walter, Henriette. 1982. Enquête phonologique du français. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wassink, Alicia Beckford. 2006. “A Geometric Representation of Spectral and Temporal Vowel Features: Quantification of Vowel Overlap in Three Varieties.” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 119 (4): 2334–2350. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yu, Alan C. L. 2007. “Understanding Near Mergers: The Case of Morphological Tone in Cantonese.” Phonology 24 (1): 187–214. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Picone, Michael D.
2025. Globalization, Localization, and the Preservation of French in North America (including Creole Relevancies). American Speech 100:4  pp. 467 ff. DOI logo
Wendy Ayres-Bennett & Mairi McLaughlin
2024. The Oxford Handbook of the French Language, DOI logo
Molina García, Álvaro
2023. The pitfalls of near-mergers: A sociophonetic approach to near-demergers in the Malaga /θ/ vs /s/ split. Open Linguistics 9:1 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue