In:Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 11: Selected papers from the 44th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL), London, Ontario
Edited by Silvia Perpiñán, David Heap, Itziri Moreno-Villamar and Adriana Soto-Corominas
[Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 11] 2017
► pp. 147–167
Chapter 7Partial subject paradigms and feature geometry in Northern Occitan dialects
Published online: 19 October 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/rllt.11.07oli
https://doi.org/10.1075/rllt.11.07oli
Abstract
In between the minority of Romance languages that have full paradigms of subject clitics (e.g. Standard French) and the unmarked null subject grammars (e.g. Spanish, Italian and most Occitan dialects), a continuum of transitional varieties shows between one and five nominative clitics. Unlike the better documented Northern Italian Dialects, Northern Occitan Dialects have nominative clitics paradigms which typically begin with distinct meteorological subjects. The shape and sequence of the partial nominative clitic paradigms maps the progressive diachronic introduction of contrasts using underspecified monovalent features organized hierarchically to reflect implicational dependencies, following Harley & Ritter’s (2002) Feature Geometry. Meteorological subject pronouns play a crucial role in this diachronic progression precisely because they lack morphological features and therefore can map onto non-referential subjects.
Keywords: clitic subjects, null subjects, meteorological verbs, partial paradigms, Occitan
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Data from Northern Occitan Dialects (NODs)
- 3.Previous analyses
- 4. ko : A different subject pronoun
- 5.Beyond binary features: A proposed feature geometry
- 6.Building up contrast in paradigms
- 7.Conclusion
Notes References
References (32)
Gilliéron, Jules & Edmond EdmontALF = Gilliéron, Jules & Edmond Edmont. Atlas Linguistique de la France, Paris, Champion, 1902–1910.
Potte, Jean-ClaudeALAL = Potte, Jean-Claude. Atlas Linguistique et ethnographique de l’Auvergne et du Limousin, Paris, CNRS, 1975–1992.
Ravier, XavierALLOc = Ravier, Xavier. Atlas Linguistique et ethnographique du Languedoc Occidental, Paris, CNRS, 1978–1994.
Séguy, JeanALG = Séguy, Jean. Atlas Linguistique et ethnographique de la Garonne, Paris, CNRS, 1954–1973.
Dalbera, Jean-Philippe, Dominique Strazzabosco, Michèle Oliviéri, Pierre-Aurélien Georges & Guylaine Brun-TrigaudTHESOC = Dalbera, Jean-Philippe, Dominique Strazzabosco, Michèle Oliviéri, Pierre-Aurélien Georges & Guylaine Brun-Trigaud, Thesaurus Occitan, <[URL]>, 1992.
Bruhn de Garavito, Joyce, Jacques Lamarche & David Heap. 2002. “French and Spanish Se: Underspecified, not Reflexive.” 2002 Proceedings of the Canadian Linguistic Association.
Burzio, Luigi. 1992. “On the morphology of reflexives and impersonals.” In Theoretical analyses in Romance linguistics. Current issues in linguistic theory 74, ed by Christiane Laeufer & Terrell A. Morgan, 399–414. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Cabredo Hofherr, Patrizia. 2000. La passivation des intransitifs en allemand et le statut des explétifs. Paris: Université Paris VII – Denis Diderot, U.F.R. de linguistique.
Cabredo Hofherr, Patrizia. 2004. “Les clitiques sujets du français et le paramètre du sujet nul.” Langue Française 141: 99–109. doi:
Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding. The Pisa Lectures. Second revised edition 1982. Dordrecht: Foris.
Dalbera, Jean-Philippe, Michèle Oliviéri, Jean-Claude Ranucci, Guylaine Brun-Trigaud & Pierre-Aurélien Georges. 2012. “La base de données linguistique occitane THESOC. Trésor patrimonial et instrument de recherche scientifique.” Estudis Romànics 34: 367–387.
De Vogelaer, Gunther & Guido Seiler (eds.). 2012. The Dialect Laboratory. Amsterdam: Benjamins. doi:
Diémoz, Federica. 2007. Morphologie et syntaxe des pronoms personnels sujets dans les parlers francoprovençaux de la Vallée d’Aoste. Tübingen: A. Francke Verlag.
Gilliéron, Jules & Jean Mongin. 1905. “Scier” dans la Gaule romane du Sud et de l’Est, Paris: Champion.
Harley, Heidi & Elizabeth Ritter. 2002. “Person and number in pronouns: A feature-geometric analysis.” Language 78: 482–526. doi:
Heap, David. 2000. La variation grammaticale en géolinguistique: les pronoms sujets en roman central. München: Lincom Europa.
Heap, David. 2002. “Split subject pronoun paradigms : Feature geometry and underspecification.” In Current Issues in Romance Languages : Selected Papers from the 29th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL), Ann Arbor, 8–11 April 1999, ed. by Teresa Satterfield, Christina M. Tortora, and Diana Cresti, 129–144. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: Benjamins. doi:
Heap, David & Michèle Oliviéri. 2013. “On the emergence of nominative clitics in Romance dialects.” Paper at the Workshop European Dialect Syntax VII, University of Constance, 13–15 juin 2013.
Kaiser, Georg A., Michèle Oliviéri & Katerina Palasis. 2013. “Impersonal constructions in northern Occitan.” In Current Approaches to Limits and Areas in Dialectology, ed by Xosé Afonso Álvarez Perez, Ernestina Carrilho & Catarina Magro, 345–366. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Press/CSP.
Manzini, M. Rita & Leonardo M. Savoia. 2005. I dialetti italiani e romanci: morfosintassi generativa. Alessandria: Edizioni dell’Orso.
Mettouchi, Amina & Mauro Tosco, 2011. “Impersonal configurations and theticity: the case of meteorological predications in Afroasiatic. ” In Impersonal Constructions: A cross-linguistic perspective, ed. by Andrej Malchukov & Anna Siewierska, 307–322. Amsterdam: Benjamins. doi:
Meyerhoff, Miriam. 1997. ‘Be I no GAT’: constraints on null subjects in Bislama. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Thesis.
Oliviéri, Michèle. 2010. “From Dialectology to Diachrony: Evidence from Lexical and Morpho-Syntactic Reconstruction in Romance Dialects.” Proceedings of Methods XIII. Papers from The Thirteenth International Conference on Methods in Dialectology, 2008, ed. by Barry Heselwood and Clive Upton, 42–52. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
Oliviéri, Michèle. 2011. “Typology or Reconstruction: the Benefits of Dialectology for Diachronic Analysis.” In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2009. Selected papers from ‘Going Romance’ Nice 2009, ed. by Janine Berns, Haike Jacobs, and Tobias Scheer, 239–253. Amsterdam: Benjamins. doi:
Oliviéri, Michèle, Georg A. Kaiser, Michael Zimmermann, Katerina Palasis, and Richard Faure. à paraître 2015. “Quand la dialectologie, la diachronie et l'acquisition se parlent : Étude comparative des pronoms sujets en occitan et en français.” In SyMiLa 2015: La microvariation syntaxique dans les langues romanes de France, ed. by Patrick Sauzet, and Jean Sibille. Limoges: Lambert Lucas.
Palasis, Katerina. 2010. Syntaxe générative et acquisition: le sujet dans le développement du système linguistique du jeune enfant. Villeneuve d’Ascq: ANRT Diffusion.
Renzi, Lorenzo & Laura Vanelli. 1983. “I pronomi soggetto in alcune varietà romanze.” In Scritti linguistici in onore di G.B. Pellegrini, 42–56. Pisa: Pacini.
Ronjat, Jules. 1937. Grammaire Istorique des Parlers Provençaux Modernes. Genève-Marseille: Slatkine / Laffitte Reprints.
Tosco, Mauro. 2005. “La naissance d’une catégorie morphologique: les clitiques sujet entre couchitique et langues romanes.” Faits de langues 26: 203–215.
Tosco, Mauro. 2007. “Feature-geometry and diachrony.” Diachronica 24 1: 119–153. doi:
