Cover not available

In:Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 11: Selected papers from the 44th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL), London, Ontario
Edited by Silvia Perpiñán, David Heap, Itziri Moreno-Villamar and Adriana Soto-Corominas
[Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 11] 2017
► pp. 77–97

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Chapter 4
Pluralities of events

Semelfactives and a case of ‘single event’ nominalisation

 | University of Cologne | Emerging Group DSLC
 | Université Paris VII
Published online: 19 October 2017
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/rllt.11.04don
Abstract
In this paper, we tackle the issue of the semantics of semelfactive predicates by looking at ata-nominalisations built on instrument semelfactive verbs in Italian. Being nomen vicis forms, these nominalisations denote singular instances of events. The comparison allows us to cast new light on the issue of what counts as a unit in the domain of semelfactive verbs. We then apply this line of exploration to the issue of the double reading of semelfactives – semel and processive, and show that the two readings of their ata-nominalisations correspond to predicates belonging to distinct aspectual types.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Semelfactives and ata-nominalisations
    • 1.2Structure of the paper
  • 2. ata-nominalisations and delimited events
    • 2.1Origin of the form
    • 2.2Delimited events and the reading nomen vicis
    • 2.3Verbal bases and aspectual constraints
    • 2.4The case of instrument semelfactives
  • 3.Bases and readings
    • 3.1The double derivation hypothesis
    • 3.2Instrument presuppositions
    • 3.3Derivation, aspect, and non-existing verbs
    • 3.4Plurality
  • 4.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (27)
References
Acquaviva, Paolo. 2005. “I significati delle nominalizzazioni in -ata e i loro correlati morfologici.” In La formazione delle parole, ed. by Maria Grossmann and Anna Maria Thornton, 7–29. Roma: Bulzoni.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aliquot-Suengas, Sophie and Yves Macchi. 2003. “Du même et de l’autre. Analyse contrastive de trois formes historiquement apparentées: les formes suffixales françaises -ade/-ée et la forme suffixale espagnole -ada .” In La linguistique hispanique dans tous ses états. ed. by Christian Lagarde, 141–156. Perpignan: CRILAUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Arad, Maya. 2003. “Locality constraints on the interpretation of roots: The case of Hebrew denominal verbs.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 21: 737–778. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carlson, Gregory N. 1977. Reference to Kinds in English. Ph. D. thesis, University of Massachusetts at Amherst. Published by Garland, 1980.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cusic, David. 1981. Verbal plurality and aspect. Ph. D. thesis, Stanford University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Donazzan, Marta and Leticia L. Gritti. 2013. “Another look at telicity and homogeneity. Aspectual constraints on weak readings in two Romance languages.” In Time and TAME across languages, ed. by Karina V. Molsing. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholar Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dowty, David R. 1979. Word meaning and Montague grammar. Dordrecht: Reidel. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1991. “Thematic proto-roles and argument selection.” Language 67: 547–619. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gaeta, Livio. 2000. “On the interaction between morphology and semantics: The Italian suffix -ata.” Acta Linguistica Hungarica 47: 205–229. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gatti, Tiziana and Lucia Togni. 1991. “A proposito delle interpretazioni dei derivati in -ata e in s- .” Arbeitspapiere des Fachbereichs Sprachwissenschaft, University of Konstanz.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hay, Jennifer, Chris Kennedy, and Beth Levin. 1999. Scalar structure underlies telicity in “degree achievements”. In Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory IX, ed by Tanya Matthews and Devon Strolovitch, 127–144. Ithaca: Cornell University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
von Heusinger, Klaus. 2002. “The Interface of Lexical Semantics and Conceptual Structure. Deverbal and Denominal Nominalizations.” ZAS Papers in Linguistics 27: 109–124.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ippolito, Michela. 1999. “On the past participle morphology in Italian.” MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 33: 111–137.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kearns, K. 2007. Telic senses of deadjectival verbs. Lingua 117: 26–66. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. 1982. “Word formation and the lexicon.” Proceedings of the Mid-America Linguistics Conference, ed. by F. Ingemann, 3–29. Lawrence: Kansas.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marantz, Alec. 2000. “Roots: The universality of root and pattern morphology.” Handout of the talk delivered at Conference on Afro-Asiatic languages, University of Paris VII.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meirav, Ariel. 2003. Wholes, Sums, and Unities. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nesset, Tore. 2013. “The history of the Russian semelfactive: The development of a radial category.” Journal of Slavic Linguistics 21: 123–169. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rothstein, Susan. 2008. “Two puzzles for a theory of lexical aspect: the case of semelfactives and degree adverbials.” In Event Structures in Linguistic Form and Interpretation, ed. by Johannes Dölling, Tatiana Heyde-Zybatow, and Martin Shäfer, 175–198. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Samek-Lodovici, Vieri. 2003. “The internal structure of arguments. Evidence from complex predicate formation in Italian.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 21(4): 835–881. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scalise, Sergio. 1984. Generative Morphology. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scher, Ana Paula. 2006. “Nominalizações em -ada em construções com o verbo leve dar em português brasileiro.” Letras de Hoje 41: 29–48.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Simons, Peter. 1987. Parts. A study in ontology. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smith, Carlota. 1991. The parameter of aspect. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tovena, Lucia M. 2010a. “Pluractional verbs that grammaticise number through the part-of relation.” In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2008, ed. by Reineke Bok-Bennema, Brigitte Kampers-Manhe, and Bart Hollebrandse, 233–248. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2010b. “Pluractionality and the unity of the event.” In The Amsterdam Colloquium 2009, ed. by Maria Aloni and Karin Schulz, 465–473. Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2014. “Aspect and -ata event nouns in Italian.” Handout of the talk delivered at ConSole XXII, Lisbon.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue