In:Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 10: Selected papers from 'Going Romance' 28, Lisbon
Edited by Ernestina Carrilho, Alexandra Fiéis, Maria Lobo and Sandra Pereira
[Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 10] 2016
► pp. 233–258
Intervention or phasal locality?
Two ways of being local in French causative constructions
Published online: 8 December 2016
https://doi.org/10.1075/rllt.10.12rou
https://doi.org/10.1075/rllt.10.12rou
The Minimalist Program claims that only two notions of locality are necessary: phasal locality and intervention locality (in the form of the Minimal Link Condition). This paper asks whether the unification of the two is possible or desirable. An argument against unification would consist in showing that a process A obeys one locality condition and doesn’t obey the other and that another process B does exactly the reverse. Two phenomena are considered, which fit this description – respectively interpretation (R-I) and clitic placement (CL-PL). Their contrasting behavior in the French faire-construction indicates that each one obeys a locality condition that the other does not: CL-PL obeys phasal locality, R-I some form of minimality. The theoretical implications of these findings for the theory of locality and the architecture of grammar are examined in the conclusion.
References (43)
Abels, Klaus. 2003. Successive cyclicity, anti-locality, and adposition stranding, Ph.D., University of Connecticut, Storrs.
Boneh, Nora and Léa Nash. 2011. “High and higher Applicatives. The case of French non-core datives.” In WCCFL 28, ed. by Mary V Byram Washburn, et al.: 60–68.
Brüning, Benjamin. 2001. “QR obeys Superiority: Frozen scope and ACD.” Linguistic Inquiry 32: 233–273.
Cecchetto, Carlo. 2004. “Explaining the locality conditions of QR. Consequences for the Theory of Phases.” Natural Language Semantics 12: 345–397.
Chaves, Rui. 2012. “Conjunction, cumulation and respectively readings.” Journal of Linguistics 48: 297–344.
Chomsky, Noam. 1973. “Conditions on transformations.” In A Festschrift for Morris Halle, ed. by S. Anderson and P. Kiparsky, 232–286. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
. 2000. “Minimalist inquiries: the framework.” In Step by Step, ed. by R. Martin, D. Michaels and J. Uriagereka, 89–155. Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press.
. 2001. “Derivation by phase.” In Ken Hale: a Life in Language, ed. by M. Kenstowicz, 1–52. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
. 2008. “On phases.” In Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory, ed. by R. Freidin, C. Otero and M.-L. Zubizarreta, 133–166. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Costantini, Francesco. 2010. “On the argument structure of the causative construction: evidence from scope interactions.” In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2010, ed. by I. Franco, S. Lusini and A. Saab, 203–220. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Ferguson, Scott. 1996. A feature-relativized shortest move requirement. Ph.D. Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass.
Folli, Raffaella and Heidi Harley. 2007. “Causation, obligation and argument structure: On the nature of little v*.” Linguistic Inquiry 38: 197–238.
Fox, Danny and David Pesetsky. 2004. “Cyclic linearization of syntactic structure.” Theoretical Linguistics 31: 1–46.
Gawron, Jean Mark and Andrew Keller. 2004. “The semantics of respective readings. Conjunction and filler-gap dependencies.” Linguistics and Philosophy 27: 169–207.
Groat, Erich. 2013. “Is Movement a part of Narrow Syntax?” Unpublished paper, Goethe-University, Frankfurt.
Guasti, Maria Teresa. 1996. “Semantic restrictions in Romance causatives and the incorporation approach.” Linguistic Inquiry 27: 294–313.
Homer, Vincent, Tomoko Ishizuka and Dominique Sportiche. 2009. “The locality of clitic placement and the analysis of French causatives.” Talk given at
Glow in Asia, Hyderabad
.
Hu, Victor Xiaoshi. 2014. “A phasal analysis of cliticization in French causative constructions.” Unpublished paper, UFRL, Université Paris-Diderot.
. 2015. “Diagnosing the internal structure of French causative constructions.” Unpublished paper, UFRL, Université Paris-Diderot.
Ippolito, Michela. 2000. “Remarks on the argument structure of Romance causatives.” Unpublished paper, MIT.
. 2004. “Prepositions as probes.” In Structures and Beyond, ed. by A. Belletti, 192–212. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
McCawley, James. 1968. “The role of semantics in a grammar.” In Universals of Linguistic Theory, ed. by E. Bach and R.T. Harms, 124–169. New York: Holt, Reinhart and Winston.
Müller, Gereon. 2011. Constraints on Displacement. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Nash, Léa and Alain Rouveret. 2002. “Cliticization as unselective Attract.” Catalan Journal of Linguistics 1: 157–199.
Nevins, Andrew. 2011. “Multiple agree with clitics: person complementarity vs. omnivorous number.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 29: 939–971.
Rouveret, Alain, 2014. “Two ways of being local: the case of French causative constructions.” In O Universal e o Particular. Uma vida a comparar. Homenagem a Maria Francisca Xavier, ed. by A. Fiéis, M. Lobo and A. Madeira, 277–298. Lisboa: Edições Colibri.
Rouveret, Alain and Jean-Roger Vergnaud. 1980. “Specifying reference to the subject: French causatives and conditions on representations”. Linguistic Inquiry 11: 97–202.
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Hu, Xiaoshi
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
