In:Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 10: Selected papers from 'Going Romance' 28, Lisbon
Edited by Ernestina Carrilho, Alexandra Fiéis, Maria Lobo and Sandra Pereira
[Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 10] 2016
► pp. 171–190
In defense of defective intervention
Locality effects in Romance
Published online: 8 December 2016
https://doi.org/10.1075/rllt.10.09mor
https://doi.org/10.1075/rllt.10.09mor
Bruening (2014) has recently challenged the status of defective intervention as a real syntactic phenomenon, arguing that it is actually the effect of linear order. Our first goal is to show that Bruening’s (2014) potential counterexamples to the existence of syntactic defective intervention are only apparent. We will provide an explanation for his data based on adverb placement and the hierarchical architecture of clauses with experiencers. Moreover, we aim to provide a typology of Romance languages that either prohibit defective intervention like Brazilian Portuguese (BP) and Italian or languages of the Romanian/Spanish-type that obviate defective intervention on the basis of the availability of clitic doubling (Anagnostopoulou 2003, 2005).
Keywords: adverbs, clitic doubling, Defective intervention, raising, Romance
References (37)
Alboiu, Gabriela. 2006. “Are we in Agreement?” In Agreement Systems, ed. by Cedric Boeckx, 13–39. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2007. “Moving Forward with Romanian Backward Control and Raising.” In New Horizons in the Analysis of Control and Raising, ed. by W. Davies and S. Dubinsky, 187–213. Dordrecht: Springer.
Alexiadou, Artemis and Elena Anagnostopoulou. 1998. “Parametrizing Agr: word order, verb movement and EPP-checking.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 16: 491–539.
Alexiadou, Artemis, Elena Anagnostopoulou, Gianina Iordăchioaia and Mihaela Marchis. 2012. “In Support of Long Distance Agree.” In Local Modelling of Nonlocal Dependencies in Syntax, ed. by A. Alexiadou, T. Kiss and G. Müller, 55–81. Linguistische Arbeiten.
Anagnostopoulou, Elena. 2003. The Syntax of Ditransitives: Evidence from Clitics. Mouton de Gruyter.
. 2005. “Cross-linguistic and Cross-categorial Variation of Datives.” In Advances in Greek Generative Syntax, ed. by M. Stavrou et al., 61–126. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Barbosa, Pilar. 1994. “A new Look at the Null Subject Parameter.” Paper presented at
CONSOLE III
, Venice.
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and Functional Heads. A Cross-linguistic Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
. 2000. “Minimalist inquiries.” In Step by step, ed. by R. Martin, D. Michaels, and J. Uriagereka, 89–155. Cambridge: MIT Press,
Diaconescu, Constanța, Rodica. and Maria Luisa River. 2005. “An Applicative Analysis of Double Object Constructions in Romanian.” In Proceedings of the
2005 annual Conference of the Canadian Linguistic Association
. University of Ottawa.
Haider, Hubert. 1992/2000. “Branching and Discharge.” 1992. In
Working Papers of the Sonderforschungsbereich 340
(Universities of Stuttgart and Tübingen) 23: 1–31; 2000. In Lexical Specification and Insertion, ed. by Peter Coopmans, Martin Everaert and Jane Grimshaw, 135–164. Amsterdam: John Benjamins (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 197).
Holmberg, Anders. 2005. “Is There a Little Pro? Evidence from Finnish.” Linguistic Inquiry 36: 533–564.
Holmberg, Anders and Thorbjörg Hróarsdóttir. 2003. “Agreement and movement in Icelandic raising constructions”. Lingua 113: 997–1019.
Hulk, Aafke and Jean-Yves Pollock. 2001. “Subject Positions in Romance and the Theory of Universal Grammar.” In Subject Inversion in Romance and the Theory of Universal Grammar, ed. by Aafke Hulk and Jean Yves Pollock, 3–19. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kitahara, Hisatsugu. 1997. Elementary Operations and Optimal Derivations. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Ledgeway, Adam and Alessandra Lombardi. 2005. “Verb movement, adverbs and clitic positions in Romance”. Probus: 77–111
Marchis, Mihaela and Artemis Alexiadou. 2013. “The syntax of clitics revisited: two types of clitics.” Lingua Volume 127: 1–31.
Marchis Moreno, Mihaela. 2014. “‘Minimal link constraint’ violations: Move vs. Agree.” In Variation within and across Romance Languages: Selected papers from the 41st Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL), Ottawa, 5–7 May 2011, ed. by Marie Hélène Côté, Éric Mathieu and Shana Poplack, 213–232. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Martins, Ana Maria and Jairo Nunes. 2005. “Raising issues in European and Brazilian Portuguese.” Journal of Portuguese Linguistics 4: 53–77.
. 2009. “Syntactic change as chain reaction: The emergence of hyper-raising in Brazilian Portuguese.” In Historical Syntax and Linguistic Theory, ed. by P. Crisma and G. Longobardi, 144–157. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Preminger, Omer. 2008. “Breaking agreements: distinguishing agreement and clitic doubling by their failures.” Linguistic Inquiry 40: 619–666.
Rivero, María Luisa. 2004. “Spanish Quirky Subjects, Person Restrictions, and the PCC.” Linguistic Inquiry 35: 53–66.
. 2001. “Relativized Minimality Effects.” In The Handbook of Syntactic Theory, ed. by Mark R. Baltin and Chris Collins, 89–110. Oxford: Blackwell.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
