Cover not available

In:Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 10: Selected papers from 'Going Romance' 28, Lisbon
Edited by Ernestina Carrilho, Alexandra Fiéis, Maria Lobo and Sandra Pereira
[Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 10] 2016
► pp. 122

Get fulltext from our e-platform
References (30)
References
Adger, D., and Ramchand, G. 2005. “Merge and Move: Wh-dependencies revisited.” Linguistic Inquiry, 36 (2): 161–193. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bauche, H. 1928. Le langage populaire: Grammaire, syntaxe et dictionnaire du français tel qu’on le parle dans le peuple de Paris, avec tous les termes d’argot usuel. Payot, Paris.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Béjar, S. 2003. Phi-syntax: A theory of agreement. Doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Benveniste, E. 1966. Problèmes de linguistique générale. Paris.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bonet, Eulàlia. 1991. Morphology after syntax: Pronominal clitics in Romance. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Burzio, L. 1986. Italian syntax: A government-binding approach. Springer Science & Business Media. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1991The morphological basis of anaphora.” Journal of Linguistics 27: 81–105. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1992. “On the Morphology of Reflexives and Impersonals.” In Theoretical Analyses in Romance Linguistics, ed. By C. Lauefer and T. Morgan, 399–414. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. 1981. Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2000. “Minimalist Inquiries: The Framework.” In Step by Step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik, ed. by Roger Martin, David Michaels and Juan Uriagareka, 89–153. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Costa, J. and Pereira, S. 2013. “ A gente: pronominal status and agreement revisited”, The Linguistic Review 30 (2): 161–184. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halle, M. and Marantz A. 1993. “Distributed Morphology and the Pieces of Inflection.” In The View From Building 20, ed. by K. Hale and S.J. Keyser, 111- 176. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harley, H. and Ritter, E. 2002. “Person and Number in Pronouns. A feature-geometric analysis of person and number.” Language, 78: 482–526. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R. 1992. “Mme Tussaud meets the binding theory.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 10: 1–31. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kaminszczik, S. and A. Saab. 2015. “Reflexivization patterns in ditransitive sentences.Consequences for thematic theory.” [URL].
Kayne, R.S. 2003. “Person Morphemes and Reflexives in Italian, French and Related Languages.” In The Syntax of Italian Dialects, ed. by C. Tortora, 102–136. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. “Some Silent First Person Plurals.” In Merging Features: Computation, Interpretation, and Acquisition, ed. by J.M. Brucart, A. Gavarro, and J. Sola, 276–292. Oxford UniversityPress, Oxford. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika. 2009. “Making a pronoun: fake indexicals as windows into the properties of pronouns.” Linguistic Inquiry. 40: 187–237. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lara, V. 2012. “ Ustedes instead of vosotros and vocês instead of vós: an analysis through the Linguistic Atlas of the Iberian Peninsula (ALPI)”, Dialectologia, Special Issue III: 57–93.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lasnik, H. 1989. “On The Necessity of Binding Conditions.” In Essays on anaphora, 149–167. Springer Netherlands. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Manzini, M.R., and L. Savoia. 2008. Work notes on Romance morphosyntax. Ed. dell'Orso.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martins, Ana Maria. 2009. “Subject doubling in EP dialects: the role of impersonal se .” In Romance languages and linguistic theory, ed. by Enoch O. Aboh, Elisabeth van der Linden, Josep Quer and Petra Sleeman, 179–200. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Noyer, R.R. 1992.Features, positions and affixes in autonomous morphological structure (Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ormazabal, J., and Romero, J. 2007. “The object agreement constraint.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 25 (2): 315–347. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pescarini, Diego. 2010. “ Elsewhere in Romance: Evidence from clitic clusters.” Linguistic Inquiry 41: 427–444. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rooryck, J., and Vanden Wyngaerd, G.J. 2011. Dissolving binding theory. Oxford University Press, USA. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rullmann, H. 2004. “First and second person pronouns as bound variables.” Linguistic Inquiry 35 (1): 159–168. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sigurðsson, H.A. 1996. “Icelandic Finite Verb Agreement.” Working papers in Scandinavian Syntax 57: 1–46.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taylor, Michael. 2009. “On the pronominal status of Brazilian Portuguese a gente .” In NYU Working Papers in Linguistics, Vol 2: Papers in Syntax. 1–36. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vassilieva, M.B. 2005. Associative and pronominal plurality (Doctoral dissertation, Stony Brook University).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Alcaraz, Alejo
2018. The spurious vs. dative problem. In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 13 [Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory, 13],  pp. 5 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue