In:Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 10: Selected papers from 'Going Romance' 28, Lisbon
Edited by Ernestina Carrilho, Alexandra Fiéis, Maria Lobo and Sandra Pereira
[Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 10] 2016
► pp. 1–22
The obviation agreement effect
Published online: 8 December 2016
https://doi.org/10.1075/rllt.10.01alc
https://doi.org/10.1075/rllt.10.01alc
I will critically review Kayne’s (2009) hypothesis that the presence of a silent clitic explains the Absence of Principle B Effects APBE (Burzio 1991, 1992 among others) with 1st and 2nd person clitics in Romance languages. I will show that APBE does not depend on the presence of any silent clitic – against Kayne (2009) –, but on the φ-features of the DP cross-referenced by subject agreement. I will finally develop a syntactic account for the APBE with local clitics in Romance languages based on the feature decomposition of person morphemes (Kayne 2003, Béjar 2003, Harley and Ritter 2002) and the existence in Romance languages of fake indexicals clitics (Kratzer 2009).
Keywords: Absence of Principle B Effects, agreement., clitics, fake indexicals, features, reflexives
References (30)
Adger, D., and Ramchand, G. 2005. “Merge and Move: Wh-dependencies revisited.” Linguistic Inquiry, 36 (2): 161–193.
Bauche, H. 1928. Le langage populaire: Grammaire, syntaxe et dictionnaire du français tel qu’on le parle dans le peuple de Paris, avec tous les termes d’argot usuel. Payot, Paris.
Béjar, S. 2003. Phi-syntax: A theory of agreement. Doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.
Bonet, Eulàlia. 1991. Morphology after syntax: Pronominal clitics in Romance. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.
. 1992. “On the Morphology of Reflexives and Impersonals.” In Theoretical Analyses in Romance Linguistics, ed. By C. Lauefer and T. Morgan, 399–414. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2000. “Minimalist Inquiries: The Framework.” In Step by Step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik, ed. by Roger Martin, David Michaels and Juan Uriagareka, 89–153. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Costa, J. and Pereira, S. 2013. “
A gente: pronominal status and agreement revisited”, The Linguistic Review 30 (2): 161–184.
Halle, M. and Marantz A. 1993. “Distributed Morphology and the Pieces of Inflection.” In The View From Building 20, ed. by K. Hale and S.J. Keyser, 111- 176. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, .
Harley, H. and Ritter, E. 2002. “Person and Number in Pronouns. A feature-geometric analysis of person and number.” Language, 78: 482–526.
Jackendoff, R. 1992. “Mme Tussaud meets the binding theory.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 10: 1–31.
Kaminszczik, S. and A. Saab. 2015. “Reflexivization patterns in ditransitive sentences.Consequences for thematic theory.” [URL].
Kayne, R.S. 2003. “Person Morphemes and Reflexives in Italian, French and Related Languages.” In The Syntax of Italian Dialects, ed. by C. Tortora, 102–136. New York: Oxford University Press.
. 2009. “Some Silent First Person Plurals.” In Merging Features: Computation, Interpretation, and Acquisition, ed. by J.M. Brucart, A. Gavarro, and J. Sola, 276–292. Oxford UniversityPress, Oxford.
Kratzer, Angelika. 2009. “Making a pronoun: fake indexicals as windows into the properties of pronouns.” Linguistic Inquiry. 40: 187–237.
Lara, V. 2012. “
Ustedes instead of vosotros and vocês instead of vós: an analysis through the Linguistic Atlas of the Iberian Peninsula (ALPI)”, Dialectologia, Special Issue III: 57–93.
Lasnik, H. 1989. “On The Necessity of Binding Conditions.” In Essays on anaphora, 149–167. Springer Netherlands.
Martins, Ana Maria. 2009. “Subject doubling in EP dialects: the role of impersonal se
.” In Romance languages and linguistic theory, ed. by Enoch O. Aboh, Elisabeth van der Linden, Josep Quer and Petra Sleeman, 179–200. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Noyer, R.R. 1992.Features, positions and affixes in autonomous morphological structure (Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology).
Ormazabal, J., and Romero, J. 2007. “The object agreement constraint.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 25 (2): 315–347.
Pescarini, Diego. 2010. “
Elsewhere in Romance: Evidence from clitic clusters.” Linguistic Inquiry 41: 427–444.
Rooryck, J., and Vanden Wyngaerd, G.J. 2011. Dissolving binding theory. Oxford University Press, USA.
Rullmann, H. 2004. “First and second person pronouns as bound variables.” Linguistic Inquiry 35 (1): 159–168.
Sigurðsson, H.A. 1996. “Icelandic Finite Verb Agreement.” Working papers in Scandinavian Syntax 57: 1–46.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Alcaraz, Alejo
2018. The spurious vs. dative problem. In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 13 [Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory, 13], ► pp. 5 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
