Get fulltext from our e-platform
References (27)
References
Bakhtin, M. (1986). The dialogic imagination: Four essays. edited by M. Holquist. Austin, Texas: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, D. (2006). Stance in spoken and written university registers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 5(2), 97–116. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carter, M. (2007). Ways of doing, knowing and writing in the disciplines. College Composition and Communication, 581, 385–418.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gray, B., & Biber, D. (2012). Current conceptions of stance. In K. Hyland & C. Sancho-Guinda (eds.), Stance and voice in written academic genres (pp. 15–33). London: Palgrave. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haugh, M. (2014). Jocular mockery as interactional practice in everyday Anglo-Australian conversation. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 34(1), 76–99. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haugh, M., & Chang, W. (2013). Collaborative creation of spoken language corpora. In T. Greer, Y. Kite, & D. Tatsuki (eds.), Pragmatics and language learning (pp. 119–146). Honolulu: National Foreign Language Resource Centre, University of Hawai’i.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hunston, S., & Thompson, G. (eds.) (2000). Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hyland, K. (1999). Disciplinary discourses: Writer stance in research articles. In C. N. Candlin & K. Hyland (eds.), Writing: Texts, processes and practices (pp. 99–121). London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2009). Academic discourse. London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hyland, K., & Sancho-Guinda, C. (eds.). (2012). Stance and voice in academic writing. London: Palgrave. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martin, J. R., & White, P. R. R. (2005). The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Partington, A. (2008). Teasing at the White House: A corpus-assisted study of face work in performing and responding to teases. Text and Talk, 281, 771–772. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Santamaría García, C. (2013). The discourse of social networking sites in Student communication with peers. In S. Molina & A. Roldán (eds.), RESLA, Special issue (Communications and learning context in LSP: New perspectives on genre analysis), 123–142Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Santamaría-García, C. (2014). Evaluative discourse and politeness in university students’ communication through social networking sites. In G. Thompson & L. Alba-Juez (eds.), Evaluation in context (pp. 387–411). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Santini, M. (2007). Automatic identification of genre in web pages. PhD thesis, University of Brighton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Swales, J. (2004). Research genres. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thompson, G., & Alba-Juez, L. (eds.). (2014) Evaluation in context. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thompson, G., & Ye, Y. (1991). Evaluation in the reporting verbs used in academic papers. Applied Linguistics, 12(4), 365–382. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thurlow, C. (2001). Language and the internet. In M. Rejend & R. Asher (eds.), The concise encyclopedia of Sociolinguistics (pp. 287–289). London: Pergamon.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Walsh, S. (2013). Corpus linguistics and conversation analysis at the interface: theoretical perspectives, practical outcomes. In J. Romero-Trillo (ed.), Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics. Vol 11 (pp. 37–51). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weigand, E. (ed.) (2008a). Dialogue and rhetoric. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2008b). Rhetoric in the mixed game. In E. Weigand (ed.) Dialogue and rhetoric (pp. 3–22). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2009). Language as dialogue. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2010). Dialogue: The mixed game. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yus, F. (2011). Cyberpragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Dontcheva-Navratilova, Olga, Martin Adam, Renata Povolná & Radek Vogel
2020. Persuasive Strategies Across the Academic, Business, Religious and Technical Discourses. In Persuasion in Specialised Discourses,  pp. 39 ff. DOI logo
Povolná, Renata
2020. Persuasion in Technical Discourse: The Role of Interpersonal Metadiscourse Markers in User Manuals. In Persuasion in Specialised Discourses,  pp. 229 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue