Cover not available

Article published In: Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 28:2 (2015) ► pp.442–464

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

The discourses of sustainability in news magazines

The rhetorical construction of journalistic stance

 | Centro Universitario de la Defensa — University of Zaragoza
Published online: 19 February 2016
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/resla.28.2.04orn
Sustainability has become a key concept in the debate over global environmental challenges. With the view that at the heart of the environmental debate is undoubtedly the text, this paper examines the rhetorical construction of text and provides linguistic insights into how the concept of sustainability is textualized. Corpus findings show that the discourse of sustainability is constructed by interwoven discourses which depict sustainability as a goal, as a problem, or as an object of analysis or study and implemented by companies and institutions. The rhetorical construction of the argumentation of the discourses of sustainability further suggests that the news magazines convey a multiplicity of obvious or hidden communicative purposes. This paper critically examines how resources such as evaluation, hedging or intertextuality are used in journalistic discourse to convey the author’s stance towards sustainability, trying to position the audience and thus to shape the public awareness and acceptance of sustainability.
References (61)
Alexander, R. (2009). Framing discourse on the environment: A critical discourse approach. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Allen, M., Walker, K., & Brady, R. (2012). Sustainability discourse within a supply chain relationship: Mapping convergence and divergence. Journal of Business Communication, 49(3), 210–236. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Askehave, I., & Swales, J.M. (2001). Genre identification and communicative purpose: A problem and a possible solution. Applied Linguistics, 22(2), 195–212. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baker, P., Costas, G., Khosravinik, M., Krzyzanowski, M., McEnery, T., & Wodak, R. (2008). A useful methodological synergy?: Combining corpus linguistics to examine discourses of refugees and asylum seekers in the UK press. Discourse & Society, 19(3), 273–306. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bednarek, M. (2006). Evaluation in media discourse: Analysis of a newspaper corpus. London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bednarek, M., & Caple, H. (2010). Playing with environmental stories in the news: Good or bad practice? Discourse & Communication, 4(1), 5–31. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2012). ‘Value added’: Language, image and news values. Discourse, Context & Media, 1(1), 103–113. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bell, A. (1991). The language of news media. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bhatia, V.K. (1993). Analysing genre: Language use in professional settings. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2004). Worlds of written discourse: A genre-based view. London/New York: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bocking, S. (2012). Mobile knowledge and the media: The movement of scientific information in the context of environmental controversy. Public Understanding of Science, 21(6), 705–723. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boykoff, M., & Boykoff, J. (2005). Balance as bias: Global warming and the US prestige press. Global Environmental Change, 14(2), 125–136. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Buettner, A. (2010). Climate change in the media: Climate denial, Ian Plimer, and the staging of public debate. New Zealand Journal of Media Studies, 12(1), 79–97. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Calsamiglia, H., & van Dijk, T. (2004). Popularization discourse and knowledge about the genome. Discourse & Society, 15(4), 369–389. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carvalho, A. (2007). Ideological cultures and media discourses on scientific knowledge: Re–reading news on climate change. Public Understanding of Science, 16(2), 223–243. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carvalho, A., & Burgess, J. (2005). Cultural circuits of climate change in U.K. broadsheet newspapers, 1985–2003. Risk Analysis, 25(6), 1457–1469. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cronin, B. (1998). Metatheorizing citation. Scientometrics, 43(1), 45–55. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Doulton, H., & Brown, K. (2008). Ten years to prevent catastrophe?: Discourses of climate change and international development in the UK press. Global Environmental Change, 19(2), 191–202. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fairclough, N. (1995). Media discourse. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2006). Language and globalization. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fløttum, K., & Dahl, T. (2012). Different contexts, different “stories”?: A linguistic comparison of two development reports on climate change. Language & Communication, 32(1), 14–23. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fowler, R. (1991). Language in the news: Discourse and ideology in the press. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fuoli, M. (2012). Assessing social responsibility: A quantitative analysis of Appraisal in BP’s and IKEA’s social reports. Discourse & Communication, 6(1), 55–81. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gamson, W., & Modigliani, A. (1989). Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructionist approach. American Journal of Sociology, 95(1), 1–37. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grundmann R., & Krishnamurthy, R. (2010). The discourse of climate change: A corpus-based approach. Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis across Disciplines, 4(2), 125–146.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Higgins, C., & Walker, R. (2012). Ethos, logos, pathos: Strategies of persuasion in social/environmental reports. Accounting Forum, 36(3), 194–208. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hoey, M. (2005). Lexical priming: A new theory of words and language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holmgreen, L., & Vestergaard, T. (2009). Evaluation and audience acceptance in biotech news texts. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(3), 586–601. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hunston, S. (2000). Evaluation and the planes of discourse: status and value in persuasive texts. In S. Hunston & G. Thompson (Eds.), Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse (pp. 56–73). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hunston, S., & Thompson, G. (Eds.) (2000). Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hyland, K. (2005). Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies, 7(2), 173–192. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kolk, A. (2008). Sustainability, accountability and corporate governance: Exploring multinationals’ reporting practices. Business Strategy and the Environment, 17(1), 1–15. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koteyko, N. (2012). Managing carbon emissions: A discursive presentation of ‘market–driven sustainability’ in the British media. Language & Communication, 32(1), 24–35. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levy, D. (1997). Environmental management as political sustainability. Organization & Environment, 10(2), 126–147. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Livesey, S., Hartman, C., Stafford, E., & Shearer, M. (2009). Performing sustainable development through eco–collaboration: The Ricelands Habitat Partnership. Journal of Business Communication, 46(4), 423–454. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Louw, B. (1993). Irony in the text or insincerity in the writer–The diagnostic potential of semantic prosodies. In M. Baker, G. Francis, & E. Tognini-Bonelli (Eds.), Text and technology (pp. 157–176). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
MacDonald, M., & Hunter, D. (2013). The discourse of Olympic security: London 2012. Discourse & Society, 24(1), 66–88. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
MacDonald, S.P. (2005). The Language of journalism in treatments of hormone replacement news. Written Communication, 22(3), 275–297. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mahlberg, M. (2007). Lexical items in discourse: Identifying local textual functions of sustainable development . In M. Hoey, M. Mahlberg, M. Stubbs, & W. Teubert (Eds.), Text, discourse and corpora: Theory and analysis (pp. 191–218). London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martin, J., & White, P. (2005). The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mühlhäusler, P., & Peace, A. (2006). Environmental discourses. The Annual Review of Anthropology, 351, 457–479. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Olausson, U. (2009). Global warming—global responsibility?: Media frames of collective action and scientific certainty. Public Understanding of Science, 18(4), 421–436. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Perrin, D. (2012). Stancing: Strategies of entextualizing stance in newswriting. Discourse, Context & Media, 1(2–3), 135–147. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schäfer, M. (2012). Taking stock: A meta–analysis of studies on the media’s coverage of science. Public Understanding of Science, 21(6), 650–663. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scott, M. (2008). WordSmith Tools version 5. Liverpool: Lexical Analysis Software.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sinclair, J. (2005). Meaning in the framework of corpus linguistics. In W. Teubert & M. Mahlberg (Eds.), The corpus approach to lexicography. Thematic part of Lexicographica: Internationales Jahrbuch fuer Lexikographie, 20, 2004 (pp. 20–32). Tübingen: Niemeyer,Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stenvall, M. (2008). On emotions and the journalistic ideals of factuality and objectivity: Tools for analysis. Journal of Pragmatics, 40(9), 1569–1586. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stubbs, M. (2001). Words and phrases: Corpus studies in lexical semantics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ungar, S. (2000). Knowledge, ignorance and the popular culture: Climate change versus the ozone hole. Public Understanding of Science, 9(3), 297–312. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Dijk, T. (1988). News as discourse. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1993). Principles of critical discourse analysis. Discourse & Society, 4(2), 249–283. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2008). Discourse and manipulation. Discourse & Society, 17(2), 359–383. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Hout, T., Vertommen, B., & Pounds, G. (2012). Analyzing the view from here, there and nowhere: Discursive approaches to journalistic stance. Discourse, Context & Media, 1(2–3), 55–56. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vertommen, B., Vandendaele, A., & van Praet, E. (2012). Towards a multidimensional approach to journalistic stance: Analyzing foreign media coverage of Belgium. Discourse, Context & Media, 1(2–3), 123–134. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vis, K., Sanders, J., & Spooren, W. (2012). Diachronic changes in subjectivity and stance: A corpus linguistic study of Dutch news texts. Discourse, Context & Media, 1(2–3), 55–56. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Waller, R., & Conaway, R. (2011). Framing and counterframing the issue of corporate social responsibility: The communication strategies of Nikebiz.com. Journal of Business Communication, 9(1), 297–312.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
White, P. (2006). Evaluative semantics and ideological positioning in journalistic discourse: A new framework for analysis. In I. Lassen, J. Strunck & T. Vestergaard (Eds.), Mediating ideology in text and image: Ten critical studies (pp. 37–67). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
White, P.R.R. (2012). Exploring the axiological workings of ‘reporter voice’ news stories: Attribution and attitudinal positioning. Discourse, Context & Media, 1(2-3), 57–67. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wodak, R. (1996). Disorders of discourse. New York: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Woods, R., Fernández, A., & Coen, S. (2012). The use of religious metaphors by UK newspapers to describe and denigrate climate change. Public Understanding of Science, 21(3), 323–339. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Mateja, Dagmara
2024. Zmiany klimatu w dyskursie „Gazety Wyborczej” i „Rzeczpospolitej” w latach 2015–2022: ujęcie korpusowe. Prace Językoznawcze 26:3 ► pp. 39 ff. DOI logo
Liu, Ming & Jingyi Huang
2022. “Climate change” vs. “global warming”: A corpus-assisted discourse analysis of two popular terms in The New York Times . Journal of World Languages 8:1 ► pp. 34 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue