Get fulltext from our e-platform
References (13)
Aranda Gutiérrez, C. (2008). La composición de los nombres de marca en el sector de la alimentación. En I. Olza, M. Casado & R. González (Eds.), Actas del XXXVII simposio internacional de la Sociedad Española de Lingüística (pp. 31–39). Pamplona: Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Navarra. [Documento de Internet disponible en [URL]].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Danaher, D. (1998). Pierce’s semiotic and conceptual metaphor theory. Semiotica, 119(1–2), 171–207.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Forceville, C. (2005). Visual representations of the idealized cognitive model of anger in the Axterix album La Zizanie. Journal of Pragmatics, 371, 69–88. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2008). Metaphor in pictures and multimodal representations. En R.W. Gibbs (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 462–482). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2009). Non-verbal and multimodal metaphor in a cognitivist framework: Agendas for research. en C. Forceville & E. Urios-Aparisi (Eds.), Multimodal metaphor (pp. 19–42). Berlín/Nueva York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kövecses, Z., & Radden, G. (1998). Metonymy: Developing a cognitive linguistic view. Cognitive Linguistics, 9(1), 37–77. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langacker, R.W. (1991). Foundations of cognitive grammar. Volume II: Descriptive application. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Miranda, F., & Coutinho, M.A. (2010). Las etiquetas como género de texto: Un abordaje comparativo. En M. Ibáñez, M.T. Sánchez, S. Gómez & I. Comas (Eds.), Vino, lengua y traducción (pp. 315–334). Valladolid: Universidad de Valladolid.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F.J. (2000). The role of mappings and domains in understanding metonymy. En A. Barcelona (Ed.), Metaphor and metonymy at the croassroads: A cognitive perspective (pp. 109–132). Berlín/Nueva York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2011). Metonymy and cognitive operations. En R. Benczes, A. Barcelona & F.J. Ruiz de Mendoza (Eds.), Defining metonymy in cognitive linguistics: Towards a consensus view (pp. 103–123). Amsterdam/Filadelfia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza, F.J., & Peña, S. (2005). Conceptual interaction, cognitive operations and projection spaces. En F.J. Ruiz de Mendoza & S. Peña (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics: Internal dynamics and interdisciplinary interaction (pp. 254–280). Berlín/Nueva York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Turner, M., & Fauconnier, G. (1995). Conceptual integration and formal expression. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 10(3), 183–204. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2000). Metaphor, metonymy and binding. En A. Barcelona (Ed.), Metaphor and metonymy at the croassroads: A cognitive perspective (pp. 133–145). Berlín/Nueva York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Crichton-Fock, Anders, Charles Spence, Maria Mora & Nicklas Pettersson
2023. Enhancing the design of wine labels. Frontiers in Psychology 14 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue