Cover not available

Article published In: Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 27:1 (2014) ► pp.187–207

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Mapping concepts

Understanding figurative thought from a cognitive-linguistic perspective

 | University of La Rioja
Published online: 8 August 2014
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/resla.27.1.08rui
The notion of “conceptual mapping”, as a set of correspondences between conceptual domains, was popularized in Cognitive Semantics, following seminal work by Lakoff & Johnson (1980), as a way of accounting for the basic cognitive activity underlying metaphor and metonymy. Strangely enough, Cognitive Semantics has paid little, if any, attention to other cases of so-called figurative language such as hyperbole, irony, paradox, and oxymoron. This paper contends that it is possible to account for these and other figures of thought in terms of the notion of conceptual mapping. It argues that the differences between these and other figurative uses of language are a matter of the nature of the domains involved in mappings and how they are made to correspond. Additionally, this paper examines constraints on mappings and concludes that the same factors that constrain metaphor and metonymy are operational in the case of mappings for the other figures of thought under discussion.
References (40)
Barcelona, A. (2014). Metonymy. In E. Dabrowska & D. Divjak (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics (forthcoming). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clark, H., & Gerrig, R. (1984). On the pretense theory of irony. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1131, 121–126. Reprinted in Gibbs and Colston (2007, pp. 25-33.). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dirven, R., & Ruiz de Mendoza, F.J. (2010). Looking back at 30 years of Cognitive Linguistics. In E. Tabakowska, M. Choiński, & L. Wiraszka (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics in action: From theory to application and back (pp. 13–70). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Edwards, D. (2000). Extreme case formulations: Softeners, investment, and doing nonliteral. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 33(4), 347–373. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Evans, V. (2013). Metaphor, lexical concepts, and figurative meaning construction. Journal of Cognitive Semiotics, 5(1-2), 73–107.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fauconnier, G. (1997). Mappings in thought and language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibbs, R.W. (2011). Evaluating conceptual metaphor theory. Discourse Processes, 48(8), 529–562. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibbs, R.W., & Colston, H. (Eds.). (2007). Irony in language and thought: A cognitive science reader. New York: Elbaum. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grady, J. (1997). Theories are buildings revisited. Cognitive Linguistics, 8(4), 267–290. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1999). A typology of motivation for conceptual metaphor: Correlation vs. resemblance. In R.W. Gibbs & G. Steen (Eds.), Metaphor in cognitive linguistics (pp. 79–100). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hampe, B. (In cooperation with Grady, J.) (Ed.). (2005). From perception to meaning: Image schemas in cognitive linguistics. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johnson, M. (1987). The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kövecses, Z., & Radden, G. (1998). Metonymy: Developing a cognitive linguistic view. Cognitive Linguistics, 91, 37–77. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kreuz, R.J., & Caucci, G.M. (2009). Social aspects of verbal irony use. In H. Pishwa (Ed.), Language and social cognition: Expression of the social mind (pp. 325–348). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1990). The Invariance Hypothesis: Is abstract reason based on image-schemas? Cognitive Linguistics, 1(1), 39–74. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1993). The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought, 2nd. ed. (pp. 202–251). Cambridge, Mass.: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2008). The neural theory of metaphor. In R. Gibbs (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought. New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Turner, M. (1989). More than cool reason: A field guide to poetic metaphor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leech, G. (1969). A linguistic guide to English poetry. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Niño, D., & Serventi, G. (2013). Cognitive type and visual metaphorical expression. Journal of Cognitive Semiotics, 5(1-2), 367–392.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Norrick, N.R. (2004). Hyperbole, extreme case formulation. Journal of Pragmatics, 36(9), 1727–1739. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Oakley, T. (2007). Image schemas. In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp. 214–235). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Peña, S. (2003). Topology and cognition: What image-schemas reveal about the metaphorical language of emotions. Munich: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2008). Dependency systems for image-schematic patterns in a usage-based approach to language. Journal of Pragmatics, 40(6), 1041–1066. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Peña, S., & Ruiz de Mendoza, F.J. (2009). Metonymic and metaphoric bases of two image-schema transformations. In K.-U. Panther, L. Thornburg, & A. Barcelona (Eds.), Metonymy and metaphor in grammar (pp. 339–361). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pomerantz, A. (1986). Extreme case formulations: A way of legitimizing claims. Human Studies, 9(2-3), 219–229. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza, F.J. (1998). On the nature of blending as a cognitive phenomenon. Journal of Pragmatics, 301, 259–274. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2011). Metonymy and cognitive operations. In R. Benczes, A. Barcelona Sánchez, & F.J. Ruiz de Mendoza (Eds.) Defining metonymy in cognitive linguistics: Towards a consensus view (pp. 103–124). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2014). On the nature and scope of metonymy in linguistic description and explanation: Towards settling some controversies. In J. Taylor & J. Littlemore (Eds.), Companion to cognitive linguistics (forthcoming). London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza, F.J., & Pérez, L. (2011). The contemporary theory of metaphor: Myths, developments and challenges. Metaphor and Symbol, 261, 161–185. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza, F.J., & Santibáñez, F. (2003). Content and formal cognitive operations in construing meaning. Italian Journal of Linguistics, 15(2), 293–320.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1995). Relevance: Communication and cognition. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1998). Irony and relevance. A reply to Seto, Hamamoto and Yamanashi. In R. Carston & S. Uchida (Eds.), Relevance theory: Applications and implications (pp. 283–293). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tendahl, M., & Gibbs. R.W. (2008). Complementary perspectives on metaphor: Cognitive linguistics and relevance theory. Journal of Pragmatics, 401, 1823–1864. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Valenzuela, J., & Soriano, C. (2005). Cognitive metaphor and empirical methods. Barcelona English Language and Literature Studies, 141 (online access at [URL]).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilson, D. (2006). The pragmatics of verbal irony: Echo or pretence? Lingua, 1161, 1722–1743. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilson, D., & Carston, R. (2007). Metaphor and the ‘emergent property’ problem: A relevance theoretic treatment. The Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication, 31, 1–40. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilson, D., & Sperber, D. (2012). Explaining irony. In D. Wilson & D. Sperber (Eds.), Meaning and relevance (pp. 123–145). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (19)

Cited by 19 other publications

Peña-Cervel, Mª Sandra
2025. Sources of incongruity in advertising. In What makes a Figure [Figurative Thought and Language, 19], ► pp. 66 ff. DOI logo
Ruiz de Mendoza-Ibáñez, Francisco J. & Maria Sandra Peña-Cervel
2025. A COGNITIVE LINGUISTIC APPROACH TO HYPERBOLIC BLENDS. Lege artis. Language yesterday, today, tomorrow ► pp. 158 ff. DOI logo
Kratochvílová, Dana
2024. Review of Peña-Cervel & Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez (2022): Figuring out figuration: A cognitive linguistic account. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 22:1 ► pp. 289 ff. DOI logo
Alarcón-Hermosilla, Salvador, Neil Nehring & Javier Campos Calvo Sotelo
2023. Drowned, Washed Up, and Left for Dead: Hyperbolic Irreverence in “Jumpin’ Jack Flash”. Rock Music Studies 10:1 ► pp. 69 ff. DOI logo
Barnden, John
2023. Irony, Exaggeration, and Hyperbole: No Embargo on the Cargo!. In The Cambridge Handbook of Irony and Thought, ► pp. 272 ff. DOI logo
Ovejas Ramírez, Carla
2021. Hyperbolic markers in modeling hyperbole: a scenario-based account. Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación 85 ► pp. 61 ff. DOI logo
Popa-Wyatt, Mihaela
2020.  Mind the gap. In Producing Figurative Expression [Figurative Thought and Language, 10], ► pp. 449 ff. DOI logo
Rasulić, Katarina
2020. Turning the heart into a neighbour. In The Language of Crisis [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 87], ► pp. 111 ff. DOI logo
Barnden, John A.
2017. Irony, pretence and fictively-elaborating hyperbole. In Irony in language use and communication [Figurative Thought and Language, 1], ► pp. 145 ff. DOI logo
Crespo-Fernández, Eliecer & Carmen Luján-García
2017. Anglicisms and word axiology in homosexual language. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 30:1 ► pp. 74 ff. DOI logo
de Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco José Ruiz
2017. Cognitive modeling and irony. In Irony in language use and communication [Figurative Thought and Language, 1], ► pp. 179 ff. DOI logo
de Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco José Ruiz
2022. Analogical and Non-analogical Resemblance in Figurative Language: A Cognitive-Linguistic Perspective. In Metaphors and Analogies in Sciences and Humanities [Synthese Library, 453], ► pp. 269 ff. DOI logo
Peña Cervel, María Sandra & Francisco José Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez
2017. Chapter 2. Construing and constructing hyperbole. In Studies in Figurative Thought and Language [Human Cognitive Processing, 56], ► pp. 42 ff. DOI logo
Peña Cervel, María Sandra
2016. Argument structure and implicational constructions at the crossroads. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 14:2 ► pp. 474 ff. DOI logo
Carrió-Pastor, María Luisa
2015. AESLA: The Spanish Association for Applied Linguistics. European Journal of Applied Linguistics 3:1 ► pp. 135 ff. DOI logo
Timofeeva-Timofeev, Larissa & Chelo Vargas-Sierra
2015. On terminological figurativeness. Terminology. International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Issues in Specialized Communication 21:1 ► pp. 102 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2022. Figuring out Figuration [Figurative Thought and Language, 14], DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2022. Modeling Irony [Figurative Thought and Language, 12], DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2023. Irony, Affect, and Related Figures. In The Cambridge Handbook of Irony and Thought, ► pp. 235 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue