Article published In: Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 27:1 (2014) ► pp.1–22
Metaphors and metonymies for the (conceptualization and expression of the) state of no emotion in English and Greek
Published online: 8 August 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/resla.27.1.01ath
https://doi.org/10.1075/resla.27.1.01ath
The vocabulary of emotion terms has been treated both within and across cultures. Emotion terms, especially terms of universal emotion concepts, have been largely discussed. What has received little or no attention at all is the state of no emotion. The paper explores this state in English and Greek. It discusses the terms and the mechanisms (metaphors and metonymies) that feature in expressions showing no emotion. It will be argued (a) that the interplay between metaphor and metonymy is a very important operation for the conceptualization of no emotion; (b) in addition to shared experience, the culture-specific schemas govern this state in the two languages.
Keywords: metonymy, embodiment, metaphor, state of no emotion, cultural cognition
References (25)
Barcelona, A. (2000). On the plausibility of claiming a metonymic motivation for conceptual metaphor. In A. Barcelona (Ed.), Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads (pp. 31–58). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Dirven, R. (2002). Metonymy and metaphor: Different mental strategies of conceptualization. In R. Dirven & R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast (pp. 75–111). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Goossens, L. (1990). Metaphtonymy: The interaction of metaphor and metonymy in expressions for linguistic action. Cognitive Linguistics, 1(3), 323–340.
Hobbs, J.R., & Gordon, A.S. (2011). The deep lexical semantics of emotions. In A. Khurshid (Ed.), Affective computing and sentiment analysis: Emotion, metaphor and terminology (pp. 27–34). Dordrecht: Springer.
Kövecses, Z. (2000). Metaphor and emotion: Language, culture, and body in human feeling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York: Basic Books.
Langacker, R.W. (2009). Metonymic grammar. In K.-U. Panther, L. Thornburg & A. Barcelona (Eds.), Metonymy and metaphor in grammar (pp. 45–71). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Lascaratou, C., & Marmaridou, S. (2005). Metaphor in Greek pain-constructions: Cognitive-functional perspectives. In S. Marmaridou, K. Nikiforidou & E. Antonopoulou (Eds.), Reviewing linguistic thought: Converging trends for the 21st century (pp. 235–254). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Marmaridou, S. (2006). On the conceptual, cultural and discursive motivation of Greek pain lexicalizations. Cognitive Linguistics, 17(3), 393–434.
Panther, K.-U., & Radden, G. (Eds.). (1999). Metonymy in language and thought. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Panther, K.-U., Thornburg, L., & Barcelona, A. (Eds.). (2009). Metonymy and metaphor in grammar. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Radden, G. (2003). How metonymic are metaphors? In R. Dirven & R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast (pp. 407–434). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Ruiz de Mendoza, F.J. (2007). High-level cognitive models: in search of a unified framework for inferential and grammatical behavior. In K. Kosecki (Ed.), Perspectives on metonymy (pp. 11–30). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
. (2011). Metonymy and cognitive operations. In R. Benczes, A. Barcelona & F.J. Ruiz de Mendoza (Eds.), Defining metonymy in cognitive linguistics: Towards a consensus view (pp. 103–123). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F.J., & Peña, S. (Eds.), (2005). Cognitive linguistics: Internal dynamics and interdisciplinary interaction. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Ruiz de Mendoza, F.J., & Pérez, L. (2011). The contemporary theory of metaphor: Myths, developments and challenges. Metaphor and Symbol, 261, 1–25.
Sharifian, F. (2011). Cultural conceptualisations and language: Theoretical framework and applications. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Sharifian, F., Dirven, R., Yu, N., & Niemeier, S. (Eds.). (2008). Culture, body, and language: Conceptualizations of internal body organs across cultures and languages. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Zlatev, J., Racine, T.P., Sinha, C., & Itkonen, E. (Eds.). (2008). The shared mind: Perspectives on intersubjectivity. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Zlatev, J., Blomberg, J., & Magnusson, U. (2012). Metaphor and subjective experience: A study of motion-emotion metaphors in English, Swedish, Bulgarian, and Thai. In A. Foolen, U. Lüdtke, T. Racine & J. Zlatev (Eds.), Moving ourselves, moving others: Motion and emotion in intersubjectivity, consciousness and language (pp. 423–450). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Cited by (5)
Cited by five other publications
Thomou, Paraskevi & Marilena Koutoulaki
2022. From usage patterns to meaning construction. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 20:2 ► pp. 305 ff.
Breeze, Ruth & Manuel Casado-Velarde
2019. Chapter 5. Expressing emotions without emotional lexis. In Emotion in Discourse [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 302], ► pp. 113 ff.
Athanasiadou, Angeliki
PONTEROTTO, DIANE
Thomou, Paraskevi
2016. Metaphor and metonymy interaction patterns in Modern Greek. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 3:2 ► pp. 299 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
