Cover not available

Article published In: Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 33:2 (2020) ► pp.357–383

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

La explicitación a través de los conectores contrastivos y consecutivos en un corpus de traducción literaria en el par de lenguas francés-español

 | Universitat Politècnica de València
 | Universitat Politècnica de València

Article language: Spanish

Published online: 10 February 2021
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/resla.18012.bra
Resumen
En este estudio pretendemos comparar, en primer lugar, la existencia de un mayor o menor uso de conectores en un subcorpus literario traducido del francés al español (FRLO-ESLT) y en un subcorpus escrito originalmente en español (ESLO); en segundo lugar, analizamos la base de las posibles diferencias encontradas en función de la relación semántica discursiva que evidencian estos conectores, y si responden a la técnica que en traducción se denomina explicitación. Para ello nos hemos centrado en dos tipos de conectores clave, pues vehiculan relaciones semánticas fundamentales en la comunicación humana: los conectores de carácter contrastivo y aquellos de carácter consecutivo. Este trabajo se enmarca dentro de una de las líneas de investigación del grupo COVALT (Corpus Valencià de Literatura Traduïda) iniciada con el estudio comparativo de estos mismos conectores en un subcorpus de traducciones del inglés al catalán frente a un subcorpus literario de catalán lengua original (Marco, J. (2018). Connectives as indicators of explicitation in literary translation: A study based on a comparable and parallel corpus. Target, 30(1). 87–111. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar).
Abstract
Explicitation analysed through the use of contrastive and consecutive connectors in a corpus of French-Spanish literary translations
In this study we intend to compare, firstly, the existence of a greater or lesser use of connectives in a literary corpus translated into Spanish and a corpus originally written in Spanish. Secondly, we analyze the basis of the possible differences found in terms of the discursive semantic relationship shown by the connectives, not forgetting if they respond to the technique that in translation is called explicitation. For this purpose we have focused on two types of key connectives, as they convey fundamental semantic relationships in human communication: connectives of a contrastive nature and those of a consecutive nature. This work is part of one of the lines of research of group COVALT (Valencian Corpus of Translated Literature) that was started with a comparative study of the same connectives in a subcorpus of translations from English into Catalan compared to an analogous corpus of originals in Catalan (Marco, J. (2018). Connectives as indicators of explicitation in literary translation: A study based on a comparable and parallel corpus. Target, 30(1). 87–111. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar).
Article outline
  • 1.Introducción
  • 2.La noción de explicitación a través de los conectores discursivos en español
  • 3.Metodología de estudio y corpus
  • 4.Resultados y discusión
  • 5.Conclusiones
  • Notas
  • Referencias
References (27)
Referencias
Blum-Kulka, S. (1986). Shifts of Cohesion and Coherence in Translation. Interlingual and Intercultural Communication. Discourse and cognition in translation and second language acquisition, 17–35.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Degand, L., y Pander Maat, H. (2003). A Contrastive Study of Dutch and French Causal Connectives on the Speaker Involvement Scale. LOT Occasional series, 11, 175–199.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Delport, M.-F. (1985). Les horloges du traducteur. Bulletin Hispanique, 87(3–4), 363–386. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1989). Le traducteur omniscient (Deux figures de traduction: l’explicitation et l’amplification). En J. Canavaggio, y B. Darbord (Eds.), La traduction (pp. 89–105). Caen: Centre de recherche en langues, littératures et civilisations du monde ibérique et de l’Italie.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Denturck, K. (2012). Explicitation vs. Implicitation: A Bidirectional Corpus-based Analysis of Causal Connectives in French and Dutch Translations. Across languages and cultures, 13(2), 211–227. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halverson, S. (2004). Connectives as a Translation Problem. An International Encyclopedia of Translation Studies, 11, 562–572.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Klaudy, K. (1993). On explicitation hypothesis. En K. Klaudy y J. Kohn (Eds.), Transferre necesse est… Current Issues of Translation Theory. In honour of György Radó on his 80th birthday (pp. 69–77). Szombathely: Daniel Berzsenyi College.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1996). Back Translation as a Tool for Detecting Explicitation Strategies in Translation. Translation Studies in Hungary. Budapest: Scholastica, 99–114.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2009). The Asymmetry Hypothesis in Translation Research. Translators and Their Readers. In Homage to Eugene A. Nida. Brussels: Les Éditions du Hazard, 283–303.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Klaudy, K., y Károly, K. (2005). Implicitation in translation: Empirical evidence for operational asymmetry in translation. Across Languages and Cultures, 6(1), 13–28. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2007, September). The Asymmetry Hypothesis Further Developed: the Asymmetry of Upgrading and Downgrading in Translation. Paper presented at Fifth International Congress of the European Society for Translation Studies, Why Translation Studies Matters . Ljubljana.
Laviosa, S. (2002). Corpus-based translation studies: theory, findings, applications (Vol. 171). Rodopi. Le Trésor de la Langue française informatisé (TLFi). [URL]
Martín Zorraquino, Mª A., y Portóles Lázaro, J. (1999). Los marcadores del discurso». En I. Bosque, V. Demonte, F. Lázaro Carreter, M. V. Pavón Lucero, y Real Academia (Dirs.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española (vol 31, pp. 4051–4213). Madrid: Espasa-Calpe.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nida, E. A. (1964). Toward a Science of Translating. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nølke, H. (2007). Connectors in a Cross-linguistic Perspective. Languages in contrast, 7(2), 167–183. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Portóles Lázaro, J. (1998). Marcadores del discurso. Barcelona, España: Ariel (col. «Ariel Practicum»).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pym, A. (2005). Explaining explicitation. En K. Károly y Á. Fóris (Eds.), New trends in translation studies. In honour of Kinga Klaudy (pp. 29–43). Budapest: Akadémia Kiadó.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Séguinot, C. (1988). Pragmatics and the Explicitation Hypothesis. TTR: traduction, terminologie, rédaction, 1(2), 106–113. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sperber, D., y Wilson, D. (1986). Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford, Inglaterra: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1989). La pertinence. Communication et cognition. Paris, Francia: Éditions de Minuit.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Traugott, E. C. (1995). The role of the development of discourse markers in a theory of grammaticalization. Paper presented at ICHL XII, Manchester. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vinay, J.-P., y Darbelnet, J. (1958). Stylistique comparée du Français et de l’Anglais. Paris, Francia: Didier.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1995). Comparative Stylistics of French and English. Amsterdam, Países Bajos: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zufferey, S., y Cartoni, B. (2014). A multifactorial analysis of explicitation in translation. Target. International Journal of Translation Studies, 26(3), 361–384. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue