Article published In: Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 33:2 (2020) ► pp.384–415
Thinking for speaking in the right aspect
On whether modern English grammars can do more
Published online: 10 February 2021
https://doi.org/10.1075/resla.18007.bul
https://doi.org/10.1075/resla.18007.bul
Abstract
In this article we focus on the category of aspect and examine modern English grammars to see whether they give sufficient guidelines to the learner on how aspectual meanings are decoded and encoded in English. More precisely, we check whether the grammars reflect the abundant linguistic research on aspectual construal in English. Out of a number of components that play a role in the shaping of aspectual meaning, we look at the following four: lexical aspect, arguments, grammatical aspect, and tense. An overview is first made of the key theoretical findings on the impact of these four components on aspectual interpretation, followed by an analysis of the grammar content on the given components. Our conclusion is that only two comprehensive grammars we examined take into account the results of linguistic research on aspect to a certain extent and that there is a lot of room for improvement.
Keywords: aspect in grammars, lexical aspect, arguments, grammatical aspect, tense
Resumen
Pensar para hablar en el aspecto correcto: Pueden o no las gramáticas modernas de la lengua inglesa ayudar más
En el presente artículo nos centramos en la categoría de aspecto y examinamos gramáticas de inglés contemporáneo con el fin de determinar si ofrecen al alumno suficientes directrices sobre cómo se codifican y decodifican los significados aspectuales en inglés. Más exactamente, comprobamos si estas gramáticas reflejan las abundantes investigaciones lingüísticas sobre interpretación de aspecto en inglés. De una serie de componentes que juegan un papel importante en la configuración de significado aspectual, analizamos los cuatro componentes siguientes: aspecto léxico, argumentos, aspecto gramatical y tiempo. Este artículo empieza con una revisión de los principales hallazgos teóricos del impacto de los cuatro componentes sobre la interpretación aspectual y continúa con un análisis de contenidos gramaticales sobre los componentes dados. Nuestra conclusión es que sólo dos gramáticas analizadas toman en cuenta en cierta medida los resultados de investigaciones lingüísticas sobre aspecto aunque aún quedan muchas cosas que mejorar.
Palabras clave: aspecto en gramáticas, aspecto léxico, argumentos, aspecto gramatical, tiempo
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.
Literature on CA in English
- 2.1CA in linguistic theory
- 2.1.1Lexical aspect
- 2.1.2Arguments
- 2.1.3Grammatical aspect
- 2.1.4Tenses
- 2.2CA in the literature on second-language acquisition (‘SLA’)
- 2.1CA in linguistic theory
- 3.Grammars on CA in English
- 3.1Group one: Comprehensive grammars of English treating aspect as a tense/aspect category
- 3.2Group two: Comprehensive grammars of English addressing aspect more systematically
- 3.2.1Overall approach to aspect
- 3.2.2Lexical aspect
- 3.2.3Arguments
- 3.2.4Grammatical aspect
- 3.2.5Tenses
- 3.3Group three: Specialised grammars
- 4.Discussion
- 5.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
References
References (73)
Arad, M. (1998). VP-Structure and the Syntax-Lexicon Interface. MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics 16. London: University College.
Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Reynolds, D. W. (1995). The Role of Lexical Aspect in the Acquisition of Tense and Aspect. Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages, 29(1), 107–131.
Bardovi-Harlig, K. (1999). From morpheme studies to temporal semantics. Tense-aspect research in SLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 211, 341–382.
Bertinetto, P. M., & Lentovskaya, A. (2011). Degree Verbs. A contrastive Russian-English analysis. Proceedings of the conference on “Verbal Aspect: Grammatical meaning and context”, Padova 30/IX-4/X, 2011.
Bybee, J., Perkins, R., & Pagliuca, W. (1994). The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago: University of Chicago.
Bulatovic, V. (2013a). Modern theories of aspect in English and Serbian EL2 learners. Belgrade English Language and Literature Studies, V1, 65–79.
(forthcoming). Aspect semantics and ESL article use. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching.
Comrie, B. (1976). Aspect. An Introduction to the Study of Verbal Aspect and Related Problems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Carter, R., & McCarthy, M. (2006). Cambridge Grammar of English, A Comprehensive Guide. Spoken and Written English Grammar and Usage. Cambridge: CUP.
Dahl, O. (1984). Perfectivity in Slavonic and Other Languages. In C. de Groot & H. Tommola (Eds.), Aspect Bound: A Voyage into the realm of Germanic, Slavonic and Finno-Ugrian aspectology (Proceedings from the First Scandinavian Symposium on Aspectology in Vaasa, Aug. 26–28, 1983). Dordrecht-Holland/Cinnaminson: Foris Publications, 3–22.
Declerck, R. (2006). The grammar of the English tense system. A Comprehensive Analysis. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Dimitrova-Vulchanova, M. (1999). Verb Semantics, Diathesis and Aspect. LINCOM Studies in Theoretical Linguistics, 8. Munich: LINCOM Europa.
Downing, A., & Locke, P. (2006). English Grammar. A University Course. The second edition. London and New York: Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group.
Dowty, D. R. (1977). Toward a Semantic Analysis of Verb Aspect and the English ‘Imperfective’ Progressive. Linguistics and Philosophy, 11, 45–78.
Dowty, D. R. (1988). Thematic Proto-Roles, Subject Selection, and Lexical Semantic Defaults. Paper presented at the 1987 LSA Colloquium. San Francisco.
Filip, H. (2001). Nominal and verbal semantic structure: analogies and interactions. Language Sciences, 231, 453–501.
Glasbey, S. R. (1994). Event structure in natural language discourse. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Edinburgh.
Ionin, T., Ko, H., & Wexler, K. (2004). Article semantics in L2-acquisition: the role of specificity. Language Acquisition, 121, 3–69.
Ionin, T., & Montrul, S. (2010). The role of L1-transfer in the interpretation of articles with definite plurals in L2-English. Language Learning, 601, 877–925.
Hlebec, B. (1990). Aspects, Phases and Tenses in English and Serbo-Croatian. Grazer Linguistische Monographien 8. Graz.
Hopkins, D., & Cullen, P. (2007). Cambridge Grammar for IELDS. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kabakčiev, K. (2000). Aspect in English: A “Common-Sense” View of the Interplay between Verbal and Nominal Referents (Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy 75). Dordrecht: Springer.
(2017). An English Grammar: main stumbling blocks for Bulgarians learning English. Stuttgart: Mariana Kabakchiev Verlag.
Ko, H., Perovic, A., Ionin, T., & Wexler, K. (2008). Semantic Universals and Variation in L2 Article Choice. In R. Slabakova, J. Rothman, P. Kempchinsky & E. Gavruseva (eds.), Proceedings of the 9th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Conference (GASLA 2007), (pp. 118–129). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
Kortmann, B. (1991). The Triad “Tense-Aspect-Aktionsart: Problems and Possible Solutions. Belgian Journal of Linguistics, 61, 9–30.
Krifka, M. (1986). Nominalreferenz und Zeitkonstitution. Zur Semantik von Massentermend, Individualtermen, Aspektklassen. PhD thesis, The University of Munich, Germany.
(1989). Nominal Reference, Temporal Constitution and Quantification in Event Semantics. In R. Bartsch, J. van Bentham & P. van Emde Boas (Eds.), Semantics and Contextual Expressions (pp. 75–115). Dordrecht: Foris.
(1992). Thematic Relations as Links between Nominal Reference and Temporal Constitution. In I. A. Sag & A. Szabolcsi (Eds.), Lexical Matters (pp. 29–53). Stanford: CSLI Publications, Stanford University.
(1998). The Origins of Telicity. In S. Rothstein (Ed.), Events and Grammar (pp. 197–235). Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Maslov, J. S. (Ed.). (1985). Contrastive Studies in Verbal Aspect. Studies in Descriptive Linguistics, vol. 141. Heidelberg.
Morales-Reyes, A. (2016). Transfer and semantic universals in the L2 acquisition of the English articles system by child L2 learners. Language Acquisition, 231, 57–74.
Muñoz, C., & Gilabert, R. (2011). More evidence concerning the Aspect Hypothesis: The acquisition of English progressive aspect by Catalan-Spanish instructed learners. IRAL, 491, 241–263.
Reinhart, T. (1984). Principles of Gestalt Perception in the Temporal Organization of Narrative Texts. Linguistics, 221, 779–809.
Rothstein, S. (2001). What are Incremental Themes? In J. A. Gerhard, S. Strigin, S. Wilder & N. Zhang (Eds.), (2001). Papers on predicative constructions: Proceedings of the workshop on secondary predication, October 16–17, 2000, Berlin (ZAS Papers in Linguistics 22) (pp. 139–159). Berlin: ZAS.
(Ed.). (2008). Theoretical and Crosslinguistic Approaches to the Semantics of Aspect. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Slabakova, R. (2001). Telicity in the second language. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Slobin, D. (1996). From “thought and language” to “thinking for speaking. In J. Gumperz & S. Levinson (Eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity (pp. 70–96). Cambridge. MA: Cambridge University Press.
Talmy, L. (2000). Toward a Cognitive Semantics. Volume 11. Concept Structuring Systems. Cambridge, Massachusetts and London, England: A Bradford Book, The MIT Press.
Thelin, N. B. (1990). Verbal Aspect in Discourse: on the State of the Art. In N. B. Thelin (Ed.), Verbal Aspect in Discourse. Contributions to the Semantics of Time and Temporal Perspective in Slavic and Non-Slavic Languages (pp. 3–88). Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Co.
Thomson, A. J., & Martinet, A. V. (1986). A Practical English Grammar. 4th edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Trenkic, D. (2007). Variability in second language article production: beyond the representational deficit vs. processing constraints debate. Second Language Research, 23(3), 289–327.
(1967). Verbs and times. Linguistics in Philosophy. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press, 97–121.
(1993). A theory of Aspectuality. The interaction between temporal and atemporal structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Kutsarova, Sema
Bakardzhieva-Morikang, Svitlana & Krasimir Kabakčiev
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
