Cover not available

Article published In: Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 32:1 (2019) ► pp.356–384

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Rhetorical strategies in PhD conclusions of computer science

From the review of the study to consolidation of research space

 | Universitat Politècnica de València
Published online: 24 July 2019
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/resla.16034.sol
Abstract
This study investigates the predominant moves and move patterns used in the separate final conclusion chapters of 48 PhD theses of computer science at a UK university. The focus is on the most salient connections of steps in the review of the study (Move 1) with steps for the consolidation of research space (Move 2). The most common combinations relate (1) a summary of the thesis work to the product and the evaluation of the product, (2) the purpose, thesis statement or hypothesis to the findings or results, (3) the research questions to the methodology, product or claim, (4) a problem or need to a specific methodology, a new product and/or a claim, and (5) a summary of the work done in each thesis chapter to the findings and claims. Some findings are specific of the field of computer science. The study has pedagogical implications for courses of English for Academic Purposes (EAP).
Resumen
Este artículo analiza los patrones de movimientos que predominan en los capítulos finales de conclusión de 48 tesis doctorales de informática en una universidad británica. Se centra en la naturaleza y frecuencia de las conexiones entre pasos del Movimiento 1 sobre la revisión del trabajo de investigación y los pasos del Movimiento 2, de consolidación del espacio investigador. Las combinaciones más comunes relacionan (1) el resumen del trabajo de la tesis con el producto y su evaluación, (2) el propósito y la hipótesis inicial con los resultados, (3) las preguntas de investigación con la metodología, el producto y la reivindicación, (4) un problema o necesidad con una metodología específica, un nuevo producto y/o una reivindicación, y (5) un resumen del trabajo realizado en cada capítulo con los resultados y reivindicaciones. Algunos de los resultados obtenidos son específicos del área de la informática. Del estudio se desprenden implicaciones pedagógicas para cursos de inglés para fines específicos (IFA).
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Previous literature
  • 3.Method
    • 3.1The corpus
    • 3.2Analytical procedure
  • 4.Results
    • 4.1Quantitative results
      • 4.1.1Moves, move sequences and cycles of move sequences
      • 4.1.2M1-M2 patterns
      • 4.1.3Connections of steps of M1 with steps of M2
    • 4.2Qualitative description of M1-M2 sequences: The connections of steps of M1 with steps of M2
      • 4.2.1From reviewing the thesis work to presenting and evaluating the product: M1-Step 1/M2- Steps 4 and 11
      • 4.2.2From restating the purpose and the methodology to presenting the findings: M1-Steps 2 and 8/ M2-Step 3
      • 4.2.3From restating the thesis statement and/or research questions to presenting answers to research questions or the claim: M1-Step 2 / M2-Steps 2, 4, or 10
      • 4.2.4From restating the problem/need to presenting and evaluating solutions: M1-Step 7/ M2-Steps 2, 4 and/or 11
      • 4.2.5From summarizing the specific work done in each thesis chapter to presenting findings or making the claim: M1-Step 11/ M2-Steps 3 or 10
    • 4.3Connections of steps of M1 with steps of M2 in M1-M2 cycles
  • 5.Conclusion
  • References
References (43)
References
Asunción, T. Z. S. & Querol, M. B. (2013). Rhetorical moves in the introductions of masters’ theses. Graduate Research Journal, 6(1–2), 65–85.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Badley, G. (2009). Academic writing as shaping and reshaping. Teaching in Higher Education, 14(2), 209–219. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Basturkmen, H. (2009). Commenting on results in published research articles and masters dissertations in Language Teaching. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 81, 241–251. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2012). A genre-based investigation of discussion sections of research articles in dentistry and disciplinary variation. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 11(2), 134–144. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bhatia, V. K. (2004). Worlds of written discourse. London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bitchener, J. & Basturkmen, H. (2006). Perceptions of the difficulties of postgraduate L2 thesis students writing the discussion section. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 51, 4–18. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bunton, D. (2002). Generic moves in PhD thesis introductions. In J. Flowerdew (Ed.), Academic discourse (pp. 57–75). London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2005). The structure of PhD conclusion chapters. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 41, 207–224. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cotos, E. (2014). Genre-based automated writing evaluation for L2 research writing: from design to evaluation and enhancement. New York: Palgrave McMillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cumming, A., Lai, C. & Cho, H. (2016). Students’ writing from sources for academic purposes: A synthesis of recent research. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 231, 47–58. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dewey, J. (1997) (1910). How we think. Mineola, New York: Dover Publications Inc. (originally published in 1910 by DC Heath and Co, Publishers: Boston).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dudley-Evans, T. (1986). Genre analysis: an investigation of the introduction and discussion sections of MSc dissertations. In M. Coulthard (Ed.), Talking about text. Discourse analysis monographs 131 (pp. 219–228). English Language Research: University of Birmingham.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Geng, Y. & Warton, S. (2016). Evaluative language in discussion sections of doctoral theses: Similarities and differences between L1 Chinese and L1 English writers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 221, 80–91. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holmes, R. (1997). Genre analysis and the social sciences: An investigation of the structure of research article discussion sections in three disciplines. English for Specific Purposes, 16(4), 321–337. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johns, A. M. (2001). An interdisciplinary, interinstitutional learning communities program: Student involvement and student success. In I. Leki (Ed.), Academic writing programs: Case studies in TESOL practice (pp. 61–72). Alexandria, VA: TESOL.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2002). Destabilizing and enriching novice students’ genre theories. In A. M. Johns (Ed.), Genre in the classroom: Multiple perspectives (pp. 237–348). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johns, A. M. & Swales, J. M. (2002). Literacy and disciplinary practices: Opening and closing perspectives. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 11, 13–28. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuteeva, M. & Negretti, R. (2016). Graduate students’ genre knowledge and perceived disciplinary practices: Creating a research space across disciplines. English for Specific Purposes, 411, 36–49. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kwan, B. (2006). The schematic structure of literature reviews in doctoral theses of applied linguistics. English for Specific Purposes, 251, 30–55. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lewkowicz, J. (2009). Concluding your master’s level thesis. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses, 591, 63–72.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2012). The challenges of writing a successful thesis conclusion. In R. Tang (Ed.), Academic writing in a second or foreign language (pp. 107–125). London: Continuum International Publishing Group.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lim, J. M. H. (2014). Formulating research questions in experimental doctoral dissertations on Applied Linguistics. English for Specific Purposes, 351, 66–88. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lim, J. M. H., Loi, C. K. & Hashim, A. (2014). Postulating hypotheses in experimental doctoral dissertations on Applied Linguistics: A qualitative investigation into rhetorical shifts and linguistic mechanisms. Ibérica, 271, 121–142.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lim, J. M. H., Loi, C. K., Hashim, A. & Liu, M. S. M. (2015). Purpose statements in experimental doctoral dissertations submitted to U.S. universities: An inquiry into doctoral students’ communicative resources in language education. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 201, 69–89. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lindeberg, A. (1994). Rhetorical conventions in the discussion/conclusion sections of research articles in finance, management and marketing. In M. Brekke, O. Anderson, T. Dahl & J. Myking (Eds.), Applications and implications of current LSP research. Proceedings of the 9th European LSP symposium (pp. 761–779). Bergen, Norway: Fagbokforlaget.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Paltridge, B. (2002). Thesis and dissertation writing: An examination of published advice and actual practice. English for Specific Purposes, 211, 125–143. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Paltridge, B., Starfield, S., Ravelli, L. J. & Tuckwell, K. (2012). Change and stability: Examining the macrostructures of doctoral theses in the visual and performing arts. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 111, 332–344. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Paltridge, B. & Woodrow, L. (2012). Thesis and dissertation writing: Moving beyond the text. In R. Tang (Ed.), Academic writing in a second or foreign language (pp. 88–104). London: Continuum International Publishing Group.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Parkinson, J. (2011). The Discussion section as argument: The language used to prove knowledge claims. English for Specific Purposes, 301, 164–175. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Peacock, M. (2002). Communicative moves in the discussion section of research articles. System, 301, 479–497. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Peng, J. (1987). Organizational features in chemical engineering research articles. ELR Journal, 11, 79–116.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Posteguillo, S. (1999). The schematic structure of computer science research articles. English for Specific Purposes, 18(2), 139–160. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ridley, D. (2012) (2008). The literature review. A step-by-step guide for students. Second edition. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Samraj, B. (2008). A discourse analysis of master’s theses across disciplines with a focus on introductions. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 7(1), 55–67. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Soler-Monreal, C. (2015). Announcing one’s work in PhD theses in computer science: A comparison of Move 3 in literature reviews written in English L1, English L2 and Spanish L1. English for Specific Purposes, 401, 27–41. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2016). A move-step analysis of the concluding chapters in computer science PhD theses. Ibérica, 321(fall), 105–132.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Soler-Monreal, C., Carbonell-Olivares, M. & Gil-Salom, L. (2011). A contrastive study of the rhetorical organisation of English and Spanish PhD thesis introductions. English for Specific Purposes, 30(1), 4–17. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Soler-Monreal, C. & Gil-Salom, L. (2010). Moves, steps and linguistic signals in RA Discussion sections. In W. Hahn & C. Vertan (Eds.), Fachsprachen in der Weltweiten Kommunikation / Specialised Language in Global Communication. Proceedings of the XVIth European Symposium on Language for Special Purposes LSP). Series Sprache in der Gesellschaft, Band 30 / Language in the Society, volume 30 (pp. 519–528). Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Swales, J. M. (2004). Research genres. Explorations and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Swales, J. M. & Feak, C. B. (2000). English in today’s research world: A writing guide. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yang, R. & Allison, D. (2003). Research articles in applied linguistics: Moving from results to conclusions. English for Specific Purposes, 221, 365–385. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yayli, D. (2011). From genre-awareness to cross-genre awareness: A study in an EFL context. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 101, 121–129. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue