Article published In: Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 31:1 (2018) ► pp.159–196
Does the adapted version of The Amazing Race (AVOTAR) benefit Spanish language learning among technical students?
An empirical study
Published online: 27 August 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/resla.15019.kho
https://doi.org/10.1075/resla.15019.kho
Abstract
Students’ lack of interest and motivation in language learning has long been the focus of language scholars and researchers. In the Malaysian Technical and Vocational Education and Training (TVET) context, this concern has posed many practical challenges particularly to the foreign language teachers. This study proposes a teaching innovation adapted from the popular reality television program, The Amazing Race, to instill and promote interest in learning Spanish among the technical students. The study on the Adapted Version of The Amazing Race (AVOTAR) was conducted using a quantitative dominant mixed methods approach in a technical university where Spanish language is a compulsory subject. The quantitative findings show that AVOTAR improves learners’ linguistic performance especially in the areas of vocabulary and reading comprehension while the qualitative findings indicate that AVOTAR helps increase learners’ motivation. This may contribute useful insights to address the challenges and improve the curriculum and instruction of foreign languages.
Resumen
Durante muchos años, la falta de interés y motivación en el aprendizaje de idiomas por parte de los alumnos ha sido el foco de los investigadores y educadores. En el contexto de la Formación Profesional (FP) malasia, esta cuestión ha planteado muchos retos y en concreto en la práctica de profesores de lenguas extranjeras. Este trabajo propone una innovación pedagógica adaptada de un programa de moda de la telerrealidad, The Amazing Race, en español ‘El Gran Reto’, para inculcar y fomentar el interés por el aprendizaje del español entre los estudiantes de formación profesional. La investigación sobre la Versión Adaptada de The Amazing Race (AVOTAR) se llevó a cabo aplicando un diseño de método mixto con un enfoque predominantemente cuantitativo en una universidad técnica donde el español es una asignatura obligatoria. Los resultados cuantitativos muestran que AVOTAR mejora la competencia lingüística de los estudiantes, sobre todo en las áreas de vocabulario y comprensión lectora, mientras que los resultados cualitativos indican que AVOTAR ayuda a aumentar la motivación de los estudiantes. Este estudio aporta ideas útiles para enfrentarse a los desafíos y mejorar tanto el currículo como la enseñanza de lenguas extranjeras.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 1.1Conceptualizing innovation in Spanish language teaching
- 1.2Theoretical framework
- 1.3Objective and significance of the study
- 2.Research methodology
- 2.1Research targets
- 2.2Treatment and instruments
- 2.2.1Treatment
- 2.2.2Instruments
- 2.3Procedures
- 2.3.1Sampling
- 2.3.2Pretest and posttest
- 2.3.3AVOTAR intervention
- 2.3.4Interviews
- 2.3.5Result analyses
- 3.Results and discussion
- 3.1Quantitative findings
- 3.1.1AVOTAR and learners’ linguistic performance
- 3.1.2AVOTAR and linguistic skills reinforcement
- 3.1.3AVOTAR’s effects on learners from different backgrounds
- 3.2Qualitative findings
- 3.2.1AVOTAR and student motivation
- 3.1Quantitative findings
- 4.Conclusions
References
References (58)
Anderman, E. M., & Midgley, C. (1997). Changes in achievement goal orientations, perceived academic competence, and grades across the transition to middle-level Schools. Contemporary Educational Psychology 221, 269–298.
Blake, B., & Pope, T. (2008). Developmental psychology: Incorporating Piaget’s and Vygotsky’s theories in classrooms. Journal of Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives in Education, 1(1), 59–67.
Bley-Vroman, R. (1990). The logical problem of foreign language learning. Linguistic Analysis 201, 3–49.
Bresciani, M. J., Oakleaf, M., Kolkhorst, F., Nebeker, C., Barlow, J., Duncan, K., & Hickmott, J. (2009). Examining design and inter-rater reliability of a rubric measuring research quality across multiple disciplines. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 14(12). Retrieved from [URL]
Bruner, J. (1985). Vygotsky: A historical and conceptual perspective. In J. Wertsch (Ed.), Culture, communication, and cognition: Vygotskian perspectives (pp. 21–34). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cabrera Méndez, M. L. (2011). Diversidad en el aula [Diversity in the classroom]. Revista Digital Innovación y Experiencias Educativas, 41(87). Retrieved from [URL]
Cáceres Hernández, J. J. (2007). Conceptos básicos de estadística para ciencias sociales [Basic statistical concepts for social sciences]. Madrid: Delta Publicaciones.
Chamot, A. U. (2004). Issues in language learning strategy research and teaching. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 1(1), 14–26. Retrieved from [URL]
Chen, I. J. (2005). Using games to promote communicative skills in language learning. The Internet TESL Journal, XI(2). Retrieved from [URL]
Clark, D. (2004). Testing programming skills with multiple choice questions. Informatics in Education, 3(2), 161–178.
Collins, K. M. T., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Jiao, Q. G. (2007). A mixed methods investigation of mixed methods sampling designs in social and health science research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(3), 267–294.
Dörnyei, Z. (1998). Motivation in second and foreign language learning. Language Teaching, 31(3), 117–135.
(2001). New themes and approaches in second language motivation research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 211, 43–59.
Economic and Social Research Council. (2012). ESRC Framework for Research Ethics (FRE) 2010: Updated September 2012. Retrieved from [URL]
Farrokhi, F., & Mahmoudi-Hamidabad, A. (2012). Rethinking convenience sampling: Defining quality criteria. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2(4), 784–792.
Gabillon, Z. (2005). L2 leaner’s beliefs: An overview. Journal of Language and Learning, 3(2), 233–260.
Gardner, R. C. (2005, May). Integrative motivation and second language acquisition. Paper presented at the Canadian Association of Applied Linguistics/Canadian Linguistics Association, London, Canada. Retrieved from the University of Western Ontario website: [URL]
Gokhale, A. A. (1995). Collaborative learning enhances critical thinking. Journal of Technology Education, 7(1). Retrieved from [URL]
Hooghe, M., Stolle, D., Mahéo, V. A., & Vissers, S. (2010). Why can’t a student be more like an average person? Sampling and attrition effects in social science field and laboratory experiments. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences, 628(1), 85–96.
Johnson, R. B., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Turner, L. A. (2007). Toward a definition of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(2), 112–133.
Johnson, R. T., & Johnson, D. W. (1986). Action research: Cooperative learning in the science classroom. Science and Children, 241, 31–32.
(1994). An overview of cooperative learning. In J. S. Thousand, R. A. Villa & A. Nevin (Eds.), Creativity and Collaborative Learning: A Practical Guide to Empowering Students and Teachers (pp. 31–44). Baltimore : P.H. Brookes Pub. Co.
Keller, J. (2000, February). How to integrate learner motivation planning into lesson planning: The ARCS model approach. Paper presented at the VII Semanario, Santiago, Cuba. Retrieved from [URL]
Khong, H. K. & Cheah, S. W. (2014, October). A teaching innovation to promote Spanish language learning. Paper presented at the Colloquium of Education, Engineering & Technology (COLEET), Universiti Kuala Lumpur, Kedah, Malaysia.
Krashen, S. D. (1981). Second language acquisition and second language learning. Oxford: Pergamon Press Inc.
Kvale, S. (1996). Interviews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Lobato Fraile, C. (2006). El estudio y trabajo autónomo del estudiante [The study and student’s autonomous work]. In M. De Miguel (Dir.), Métodos y Modalidades de enseñanza centradas en el desarrollo de competencias (pp. 191–223). Madrid: Alianza Universidad.
Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey. American Psychologist 571, 705–717.
(2006). New directions in goal-setting theory. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15(5), 265–268.
Lozano, G., & Ruiz Campillo, J. P. (1996). Criterios para el diseño y la evaluación de materiales comunicativos [Criteria for the design and evaluation of communicative materials]. Monográficos marcoELE 91, 127–155.
Manga, A. M. (2006). El concepto del entorno en la enseñanza-aprendizaje del español como lengua extranjera [The concept of environment in teaching and learning of Spanish as a foreign language]. Tonos Digital 121. Retrieved from [URL]
Martín Peris, E. (1998). Documentos reales y aprendizaje comunicativo en el aula [Real documents and communicative learning in the classroom]. HIZPIDE: euskalduntze-alfabetatzearen aldizkaria 401, 43–56.
Martínez Vellón, S. (2006). El español en Malasia. In S. Martínez Vellón (Dir.), Barataria: Apuntes de la cultura española en Malasia Número 0 (pp. 6–9). Kuala Lumpur: Uniprints Marketing Sdn Bhd.
Matos, L., & Lens, W. (2006). La teoría de orientación a la meta, estrategias de aprendizaje y rendimiento académico en estudiantes de secundaria de Lima [The goal orientation theory, learning strategies and academic performance of high school students in Lima]. Persona 91, 11–30. Retrieved from [URL]
Mead, J. A. (2006). Survivor and other reality T.V. gameshows: The uses and gratifications perspective on a reality sSub-genre (Master’s thesis). Retrieved from Master’s Theses UW-Whitewater website: [URL]
Nava Olmos, A. (2009). Elementos a considerar en la motivación de personal en las bibliotecas [Things to consider in motivating librarians]. Retrieved from Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México website: [URL]
Nussbaum, M., Alvarez, C., McFarlane, A., Gomez, F., Claro, S., & Radovic, D. (2009). Technology as small group face-to-face collaborative scaffolding. Computers & Education, 521, 147–153.
Oblinger, D. G. (2006). Games and learning. EDUCAUSE Quarterly, 29(3), 5–7. Retrieved from [URL]
Radosevich, D. J., Allyn, M. R., & Yun, S. (2007). Goal orientation and goal setting: Predicting Performance by integrating four-factor goal orientation theory with goal setting processes. Seoul Journal of Business, 13(1), 21–47.
Riba, C., Torcal, M., & Morales, L. (2010). Estrategias para aumentar la tasa de respuesta y los resultados de la encuesta social europea en España [Strategies to increase the response rate and the results of European Social Survey in Spain]. Revista Internacional de Sociología, 68(3), 603–635. Retrieved from [URL]
Saint-Mont, U. (2015). Randomization does not help much, comparability does. PloS one, 10(7), e0132102. Retrieved from [URL]
Subramaniam, P. R. (2009). Motivational effects of interest on student engagement and learning in physical erucation: A review. International Journal of Physical Education, 46(2), 11–19.
Teddlie, C., & Yu, F. (2007). Mixed methods sSampling: A typology with examples. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 77–100.
Tomlinson, B., & Masuhara, H. (2009). Playing to learn: A review of physical games in second language acquisition. Simulation & Gaming, 40(5), 645–668.
Turner, D. W., III (2010). Qualitative interview design: A practical guide for novice investigators. The Qualitative Report, 15(3), 754–760. Retrieved from [URL]
Uzun, L. (2009). An evaluative checklist for computer games used for foreign language vocabulary learning and practice: VocaWord sample. Novitas-ROYAL, 3(1), 45–59.
Van Lier, L. (2004). The ecology and semiotics of language learning: A sociocultural perspective. Boston: Kluwer Academic.
Vázquez López, M. (2009). Aplicaciones prácticas del enfoque por tareas [Practical applications of task-based approach]. Monográficos marcoELE 91, 237–262. Retrieved from [URL]
Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Wagaba, W. (2010). Foreign language teaching and learning: Challenges and opportunities at Makerere University. Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics PLUS 401, 95–109.
Wesely, P. M. (2012). Learner attitudes, perceptions, and beliefs in language learning. Foreign Language Annals, 45 (s1), s98–s117.
Williams, M., & Burden, R. (1997). Psychology for language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Yeaton, W. H., & Sechrest, L. (1986). Use and misuse of no-difference findings in eliminating threats to validity. Evaluation Review, 10(6), 836–852.
Zubairi, A. M., & Sarudin, I. H. (2009). Motivation to learn a foreign language in Malaysia. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 9(2), 73–87. Retrieved from [URL]
