Article published In: The Linguistic Expression of Mirativity
Edited by Agnès Celle and Anastasios Tsangalidis
[Review of Cognitive Linguistics 15:2] 2017
► pp. 540–575
An enunciative account of admirativity in Bulgarian
Published online: 8 December 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.15.2.10gue
https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.15.2.10gue
Abstract
In this paper, I will discuss the status of the so-called admirative in the Bulgarian grammatical system, with special focus on its relation to the perfect, evidentiality and inferentiality. I will argue that admirative constructions in Bulgarian are better analyzed within the framework of the strict theory of enunciation (Bally, Benveniste, Culioli, Desclés…). In the first part of this paper, I will focus on the morphological patterns specific to Bulgarian and discuss the semantics of the phenomenon. I will also survey other analyses of the issue. In the second part, I will demonstrate that the surprise expressed by admirative constructions, marked by exclamatory intonation and clearly identified by context, exclamatory particles and interjections, results from the discrepancy between what is expected and what is observed.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.The term admirative in the Balkans
- 3.On l-participle forms and their classification in the Bulgarian verb system
- 4.Interaction with other grammatical categories
- 5.Admirative usages
- 5.1Introduction
- 5.2Admirative meanings: An enunciative analysis
- 6.Admirative: Connections to tenses
- 7.Concluding remarks
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
- Abbreviations used in glosses
References
References (92)
Aksu-Koç, A. & Slobin, D. (1986). A psychological account to the development and use of evidentials in Turkish. In W. Chafe & J. Nichols (Eds.), Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Alexander, R. (2001). Bridging the descriptive chasm: The Bulgarian ‘generalized past’. In V. A. Friedman & D. L. Dyer (Eds.), Of all the Slavs my favorites: In honor of Howard I, Aronson on the occasion of his 66th birthday (pp. 13–42). Bloomington, Ind.: Indiana University.
Alexander, R., & Zhobov, V. (2009). New conclusions on the conclusive. Journal of Slavic Linguistics, 17(1–2), 61–85.
Andrejčin, L. (1938/1976). Načini na izkazvane. In P. Pasov & R. Nitsolova (Eds.), Pomagalo po bălgarska morfologija. Glagol (pp. 336–358). Sofia: Nauka i Izkustvo.
Anscombre, J. C. (2009). La comédie de la polyphonie et ses personnages. Langue Française, 164(4), 11–31.
Asenova, P. (2004). Preizkazvaneto na glagolnoto dejstvie v bălgarskija ezik – projava na balkanskija mantalitet? Bălgarstični studii, 34–43.
Bazin, L., & Feuillet, J. (1980). L’opposition constatation/non-constatation en turc et en bulgare. Zeitschrift für Balkanoligie, 161, 9–11.
Beševliev, V. (1928). Kăm vapprosa za t. nar. “admirativ” v bălgarskija ezik. Makedonski pregled, 11, 174–177.
Bühler, K. (1934/2009). Théorie du langage: La fonction représentationelle. Trad. D. Samain. Marseille: Agone.
Celle, A., & Lansari, L. (2014). Certainty, uncertainty and unexpectedness in English and French. Language and Dialogue, 4(1), 7–23.
Chakărova, K. (2004). On the question of narrative variation in Bulgarian prose. ([URL], 17.8.2011).
Chvany, C. V. (1977). [Чвани] Оппозиции / + дейксис / + дистанция / и /+ дискретност/ v morfologii bolgarskogo i anglijskogo glagolov. Contrastive Linguistics, 61, 295–316.
(1978). Denotative and connotative meaning of the ‘PRETERITE’ and ‘PERFECT’ in Bulgarian and in English. In Papers from the Fourteen Regional Meeting, University of California, Berkeley (pp. 30–42). Chicago: University of Chicago.
Comrie, B. (1976). Aspect: An introduction to the study of verbal aspect and related problems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
DeLancey, S. (1997). Mirativity: The grammatical marking of unexpected information. Linguistic Typology, 1(1), 33–52.
Dëmina, Е. (1959). Pereskazyvatel’nye formy v sovremennom bolgarskom literaturnom jazyke. In S. B. Bernstein (Ed.), Voprosy grammatiki bolgarskogo literaturnogo jazyka (pp. 326–343). Moscow: Izdatel’stvo Akademii nauk SSSR.
Desclés, J. P. (1976). Description de quelques opérations énonciatives. In J. David & M. Robert (Eds.), Modèles logiques et niveaux d’analyse linguistique (pp. 213–242). Paris: Klincksieck.
(1980). Construction formelle de la catégorie de laspect (essai). In J. David & M. Robert (Eds.), La notion d‘aspect (pp. 195–237). Paris: Klincksieck.
(2000). Abduction and non-mbservability: Some examples from language science and cognitive science. In E. Afazzi (Ed.), The reality of the unobservable: Observability, unobservability and their impact on the issue of scienfic realism (pp. 87–112). Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer.
(2009). Opérations de prise en charge et d’engagement: Une carte sémantique de catégorisations opérées par les langues. Langue Française, 1621, 29–53.
Desclés, J. P., & Guentchéva, Z. (2015). Metalinguistic enunciative systems. An example: temporality in natural languages. In V. Arigne & C. Roque-Migette (Eds). Metalinguistic discourses (pp. 89–10). Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
(forthcoming). Inference processes expressed by languages: Deduction of a probable consequent vs. abduction. In V. Arigne & C. Roque-Migette (Eds), Theorization and representations in linguistics. Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Duchet, J. L., & Përnaska, R. (1996). L’admiratif albanais: Recherche d’un invariant sémantique. In Z. Guentchéva (Ed.), L’énonciation médiatisée (pp. 31–46). Louvain/Paris: Peeters.
Fielder, G. E. (1995). Narrative perspective and the Bulgarian l-participle. Slavic and East European Journal, 391, 585–600.
(2001). Questioning the dominant paradigm: An alternative view of the grammaticalization of the Bulgarian evidential. In A. Friedman & D. L. Dyer (Eds.), Of all the Slavs my favorites: In honor of Howard I, Aronson on the occasion of his 66th birthday (pp. 1–31). Bloomington, Ind.: Indiana University.
Friedman, V. A. (1978). On the semantic and morphological influence of Turkish on Balkan Slavic. In Papers from the fourteenth regional meeting (pp. 108–118). Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
(1982). Reportedness in Bulgarian: Category or stylistic variant. International Journal of Slavic Linguistics and Poetics, 25–26, 149–163.
(1986). Evidentiality in the Balkans: Macedonian, Bulgarian, and Albanian. In W. Chafe & J. Nichols (Eds.), Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology (pp. 168–187). Norwood. NJ: Ablex.
(1999). Evidentiality in the Balkan languages. In U. Hinrichs (Ed.), Handbuch der Siudosteuropa-Linguistik (pp. 519–544). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
(2000). Confirmative/nonconfirmative in Balkan Slavic, Balkan Romance, and Albanian with additional observations on Turkish, Romani, Georgian, and Lak. In L. Johanson & B. Utas (Eds.), Evidentials in Turkic, Iranian, and neighbouring languages (pp. 329–366). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
(2001). Hunting the elusive evidential: The third-person auxiliary as a boojum in Bulgarian. In V. A. Friedman & D. L. Dyer (Eds.), Of all the Slavs my favorites: In honor of Howard I, Aronson on the occasion of his 66th birthday (pp. 203–230). Bloomington, Ind.: Indiana University.
(2003). Evidentiality in the Balkans with special attention to Macedonian and Albanian. In A. Y. Aikhenvald & R. M. W. Dixon (Eds.), Studies in evidentiality (pp. 189–218). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
(2012). Perhaps mirativity is phlogiston, but admirativity is perfect: On Balkan evidential strategies. Linguistic Typology, 161, 505–527.
Gerdžikov, G. (1977). Edna spečifina glagolna kategorija v săvremennija bălgarski knižoven ezik. Godišnik na Sofijiskija Universitet, 69(2), 9–68.
Guentchéva, Z. (1990a). Temps et aspects: L’exemple du bulgare contemporain. Paris: Editions du CNRS.
(1990b). Valeur inférentielle et valeur ‘admirative’ en bulgare. Contrastive Linguistics, 15(4–5), 47–52.
(2006). The Bulgarian admirative and the typology of mirativity. In H. Nølke, I. Baron, H. Korzen, I. Korzen, & H. Müller (Eds.), Grammatica: Festschrift in honour of Michael Herslund (pp. 123–136). Bern: Peter Lang.
Gawne, L., & Hill, N. W. (Eds.). (2017). Evidential systems of Tibetan languages. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
Hauge, K. R. (2002). At the boundaries of the Balkan sprachbund: Pragmatic and paralinguistic isomorphisms in the Balkan and beyond. Mediterranean Language Review, 141, 21–40.
Ivanchev, S. (1973/1976). Problemi na razvitieto i funkcioniraneto na modalnite kategorii v bălgarskija ezik. In P. Pašov & R. Nitsolova (Eds.), Pomagalo po bălgarska morfologija. Glagol (pp. 348–359). Sofia: Nauka i Izkustvo.
Jakobson, R. (1957/1971). Shifters, verbal categories, and the Russian verb. In Selected Writings II (pp. 130–147). The Hague: Mouton.
Johanson, L. (2000). Turkic indirectives. In L. Johanson & B. Utas (Eds.), Evidentials in Turkic, Iranian, and neighbouring languages (pp. 61–87). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Journal of Pragmatics, 2001, 33(3).
Kim, S. Y., & Aleksova, K. (2003). Mirativity in Korean and Bulgarian. In Proceedings of Bulgaria, Korea, Central & East Europe – Humanities and Social Science (14th – 15th July, 2003). Sofia: Sofia University. ([URL])
(1994). Edno ekzotino naklonenie na bălgarskija glagol. Sofia: Universitetsko izdatelstvo “Sv. Kliment Ohridski”.
Langacker, R. (1987). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Volume I: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
(1991). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Volume II: Descriptive application, Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Lazard, G. (1956). Caractères distinctifs de la langue tadjik. Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris, 521, 117–186.
(1996). Le médiatif en person. In Z. Guentchéva (Ed.), L’énonciation médiatisée (pp. 21–30). Louvain/Paris: Peeters.
(2000). Le médiatif: Considérations théoriques at application à l’iranien. In L. Johanson & B. Utas (Eds.), Evidentials in Turkic, Iranian, and neighbouring languages (pp. 209–229). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Lindstedt, J. (1994). On the development of the South Slavonic perfect. In Three papers on the perfect. EUROTYP Working Papers, 6(5), 215–236.
(2000). The perfect: Aspectual, temporal and evidential. In Ö. Dahl (Ed.), Tense and aspect in the languages of Europe (pp. 365–384). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Linguistic Typology, 2012, 16(3).
Maslov, Y. S. (1956). K voprosu o sisteme form pereskazyvatel’nogo naklonenija. In Sbornik v čest na Aleksandăr Teodorov-Balan (pp. 311–318). Sofia.
Michailovski, B. (1996). L’Inférentiel du népalais. In Z. Guentchéva (Ed.), L’énonciation médiatisée (pp. 109–423). Louvain/Paris: Peeters.
Nitsolova, R. (2003). The evidentiality in Bulgarian and in other Balkan languages. The Third International Academic Conference of KACEES, 14th – 15th July 2003, Sofia University, 17–29.
(2007). Modalizovannaja evidencial’naja sistema bolgarskogo jazyka (Modalised evidential system in Bulgarian Language). In V. S. Hrakovskij (Ed.), Evidential’nost’ v jazykah Evropy i Azii (pp. 105–195). Saint Petersburg: Nauka.
(2008). Bălgarska gramatika (Morfologija). Sofia: Universitetsko izdatelstvo “Sv. Kliment Ohridki”. English translation by Christo Stamenov: Bulgarian Grammar, 2017. Berlin: Frank & Timme.
Penchev, Y. (1967). Kăm văprosa za vremenata v săvremennija bălgarski ezik. Bălgarski ezik, 171, 131–143.
Peirce, C. A. (1994). Collected Papers, Vol. I-VI1. Cambridge, Mass.: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Plungian, V. (2010). The types of verbal evidentiality marking. In G. Diewald & E. Smirnova (Eds.), Linguistic realization of evidentiality in European languages (pp. 15–58). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Slobin, D. & Aksu-Koç, A. (1982). Tense, aspect and modality in the use of the Turkish evidential. In P. Hopper (Ed.), Tense-aspect: Between semantics and pragmatics (pp. 185–200). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Sonnenhauser, B. (2013). Evidentiality’ and point of view in Bulgarian. Săpostavitelno ezikoznanie, 2–3, 110–130.
(2015). Hear-say, inference, surprise: (Self-)distancing in Bulgarian. In B. Sonnenhauser & A. Meermann (Eds.), Distance in language: Grounding a metaphor (pp. 117–141). Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Stankov, V. (1967/1976). Kategorii na indikativa v săvremennija bălgarski ezik. Bălgarski ezik, 171, 330–344.
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Celle, Agnès, Anne Jugnet, Laure Lansari & Tyler Peterson
2019. Interrogatives in surprise contexts in English. In Surprise at the Intersection of Phenomenology and Linguistics [Consciousness & Emotion Book Series, 11], ► pp. 117 ff.
Depraz, Natalie & Agnès Celle
2019. Introduction. In Surprise at the Intersection of Phenomenology and Linguistics [Consciousness & Emotion Book Series, 11], ► pp. 1 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
