Article published In: Review of Cognitive Linguistics
Vol. 15:1 (2017) ► pp.154–182
Premonitory urges and Touretting volcanoes
Force construal in personal narratives on Tourette Syndrome
Published online: 4 September 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.15.1.07har
https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.15.1.07har
Abstract
Causative meaning including, but not limited to, causation, prevention, and enabling is realized in language use through force construal. Force is explored in this article through consideration of narratives on Tourette Syndrome, a disorder that is largely characterized by its constitutive actions (vocal and motor tics). To account for force construal, the article proposes a merger of a vector model for the description of force in language and cognition and a lexical semantic model of ontologies and construals. Force is accounted for in terms of a number of configurations (cause, enable, prevent, withstand, and despite) that are realized through construal operations. This merger of explanatory models allows nuanced and flexible description of forceful meaning in actual language use.
Keywords: force construal, vectors, causation, causative configurations, Tourette Syndrome
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 1.1Tourette Syndrome
-
2.Ontologies and construals
- 2.1Force in language and cognition: The dynamics model
- 3.Data and method
- 3.1Written accounts of Tourette Syndrome
- 3.2Expressions of force
- 3.3Psychological force
- 4.Communicative coordination: Painting a forceful picture of Tourette
- 4.1 Like God’s own sneeze: Comparative construal
- 4.2 A Touretting volcano: Force as a basis for metaphorization
- 4.3
Police always make my tics worse: cause
- 4.3.1 I had to obey the pattern: cause through modals
- 4.4 I managed to suppress that tic: withstand
- 4.5 Let the tic out: enable
- 4.6 I can’t stop myself: prevent and despite
- 5.Implications for understanding TS experiences
- 6.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
References
References (42)
Buckser, A. (2006). The empty gesture: Tourette Syndrome and the semantic dimension of illness. Anthropology, 45(4), 255–274.
(2008). Before your very eyes: Illness, agency, and the management of Tourette Syndrome. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 22(2), 167–192.
Chilton, P. (2010). From mind to grammar: Coordinate systems, prepositions, constructions. In V. Evans & P. Chilton (Eds.), Language, cognition and space: The state of the art and new directions (pp. 499–514). London: Equinox.
(2014). Language, space and mind: The conceptual geometry of linguistic meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Evans, V., & Chilton, P. (Eds.). (2010). Language, cognition, and space: The state of the art and new directions. London: Equinox.
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (2002). The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. New York: Basic books.
Gentner, D., & Smith, L. A. (2013). Analogical learning and reasoning. In D. Reisberg (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of Cognitive Psychology (pp. 668–681). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Goldberg, A. (2010). Verbs, construction and semantic frames. In M. Rappaport Hovav, E. Doron, & I. Sichel (Eds.), Syntax, lexical semantics, and event structure (pp. 39–58). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gärdenfors, P. (2014). The geometry of meaning: Semantics based on conceptual spaces. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Harvey, K., & Koteyko, N. (2013). Exploring health communication: Language in action. London/New York: Routledge.
Hofstadter, D. R. (2001). Epilogue: Analogy as the core of cognition. In D. Gentner, K. J. Holyoak, & B. N. Kokinov (Eds.), The analogical mind: Perspectives from cognitive science (pp. 1–19). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hofstadter, D. R., & Sander, E. (2013). Surfaces and essences: Analogy as the fuel and fire of cognition. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Johnson, M. (1987). The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Kilgariff, A., Baisa, V., Bušta, J., Kovář, V., Michelfeit, J., Rychlý, P., & Suchomel, V. (2014). The Sketch Engine: Ten years on. Lexicography ASIALEX, 11, 7–36. ([URL])
Kövecses, Z. (2000). Metaphor and emotion: Language, culture, and body in human feeling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Langacker, R. W. (1987). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Volume 1: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
O’Connor, K. P., Janelle, C., Coutu, M. F., Rouleau, A., Lessard, M. J., Kirouac, C., Marchand, A., Dupuis, G., Turgeon, L., & Bélanger, M. P. (2009). ‘I’m cured but …’: Perceptions of illness following treatment. Journal of Health Psychology, 14(2), 278–287.
(2008). Configurations, construals and change: Expressions of degree
. English Language and Linguistics, 12(2), 317–343.
Paradis, C., & Willners, C. (2011). Antonymy: From convention to meaning-making. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 9(2), 367–391.
Singer, H. S. (2005). Tourette’s syndrome: From behaviour to biology. The Lancet Neurology, 41, 149–59.
Soares da Silva, A. (2007). Verbs of letting: Some cognitive and historical aspects. In N. Delbecque & B. Cornille (Eds.), On interpreting construction schemas: From action and motion to transitivity and causality (pp. 171–200). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Stukker, N., Sanders, T., & Verhagen, A. (2008). Causality in verbs and in discourse connectives: Converging evidence of cross-level parallels in Dutch linguistic categorization. Journal of Pragmatics, 401, 1296–1322.
Sweetser, E. (1990). From etymology to pragmatics: Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Talmy, L. (2000). Toward a Cognitive Semantics. Volume I: Concept structuring systems. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Verhagen, A. (2005). Constructions of intersubjectivity: Discourse, syntax, and cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
(2012). Construal and stylistics: Within a language, across contexts, across languages. Stylistics across disciplines: Conference proceedings. CD-ROM. Leiden.
Verhagen, A., & Kemmer, S. (1997). Interaction and causation: Causative constructions in modern Standard Dutch. Journal of Pragmatics, 271, 611–82.
Winter, S., & Gärdenfors, P. (1995). Linguistic modality as expressions of social power. Nordic Journal of Linguistics, 181, 137–166.
Wolff, P. (2007). Representing causation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1361, 82–111.
Wolff, P., & Song, G. (2003). Models of causation and the semantics of causal verbs. Cognitive Psychology, 471, 276–332.
Wolff, P., Song, G., & Driscoll, D. (2002). Models of causation and causal verbs. In M. Andronis, C. Ball, H. Elston, & S. Neuval (Eds.), Papers from the 37th meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society, Main session, vol. 11 (pp. 607–622). Chicago: Chicago Linguistics Society.
Wolff, P., & Zettergren, M. (2002). A vector model of causal meaning. In W. D. Gray & C. D. Schunn (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 944–949). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Cited by (4)
Cited by four other publications
Schieble, Melissa & David J. Connor
HARTMAN, JENNY
Hartman, Jenny & Carita Paradis
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
