Cover not available

Article published In: Review of Cognitive Linguistics
Vol. 15:1 (2017) ► pp.102–120

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Metonymy in numerals

 | Università degli Studi di Napoli “L’Orientale”, Italy
Published online: 4 September 2017
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.15.1.05pan
Abstract
By adopting a synchronic/diachronic perspective, the study addresses the role of metonymy in the representation of numerical quantity. This can be observed in: (a) the motivation relating individual numeral forms, as well as the internal organization of the whole numeral sequence, to non-numeric entities involved in actual quantifying procedures; (b) the phenomenon by which certain salient numerosities function as reference points (Langacker, R. W. (1993). Reference-point constructions. Cognitive Linguistics, 4(1), 1–38. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar) for other numerical representations within the functional/conceptual domain ( (2011). Reviewing the properties and prototype structure of metonymy. In R. Benczes, A. Barcelona, & F. J. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez (Eds.), Defining metonymy in Cognitive Linguistics: Towards a consensus view (pp. 7–56). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar) of numerical quantity. First, a metonymic interpretation of a small group of numerals from different linguistic areas is proposed. Subsequently, the study focuses on a class of collective numerals in contemporary standard Italian that are derived from cardinals by means of affixation with -ino. The analysis of these word formations is aimed at demonstrating that metonymic mapping is a prerequisite for derivation, and that the mapping is based on privileged conceptual/pragmatic functions within the domain of numerosity.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Non-numeric/numeric metonymic associations
    • 2.1Body parts as sources
    • 2.2Other non-numeric sources
  • 3.Numeric-numeric metonymic associations: -ino collective numerals in Italian
    • 3.1The semantic contribution of derivational suffix -ino
    • 3.2Salient numerosities as reference points
  • 4.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
  • Corpora
References (61)
References
Andronov, M. S. (1978). Sravnitel’naja grammatika dravidijskix jazykov (Comparative grammar of the Dravidian languages). Moscow: Izdatel’stvo Nauka.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barcelona, A. (2009). Motivation of construction meaning and form: The roles of metonymy and inference. In K. U. Panther, L. L. Thornburg, & A. Barcelona (Eds.). Metonymy and metaphor in grammar (pp. 363–401). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2011). Reviewing the properties and prototype structure of metonymy. In R. Benczes, A. Barcelona, & F. J. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez (Eds.), Defining metonymy in Cognitive Linguistics: Towards a consensus view (pp. 7–56). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(forthcoming). General description of the metonymy database in the Córdoba project, with particular attention to the issues of hierarchy, prototypicality, and taxonomic domains. In O. Blanco-Carrión, A. Barcelona, & R. Pannain (Eds.), Conceptual metonymy: Methodological, theoretical and descriptive issues. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Battaglia, S. (1966–2004). Grande dizionario della lingua italiana. Turin: Utet.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beeler, M. S. (1986). Chumash numerals. In M. P. Closs (Ed.), Native American mathematics (pp. 109–128). Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blažek, V. (1999). Numerals: Comparative – etymological analyses and their implications. Brno: Masarykova Univ.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Closs, M. P. (Ed.). (1986). Native American mathematics. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dahl, O. C. (1981). Austronesian numerals. In R. A. Blust (Ed.), Historical Linguistics in Indonesia, part I (pp. 46–58). Jakarta: Universitas Atma Jaya.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dardano, M., & Trifone, P. (1997). La nuova grammatica della lingua italiana. Bologna: Zanichelli.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Mauro, T. (1999–2003). Grande dizionario della lingua italiana dell’uso. Turin: Utet.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dehaene, S. (1992). Varieties of numerical abilities. Cognition, 441, 1–42. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dehaene, S., & Mehler, J. (1992). Cross-linguistic regularities in the frequency of number words. Cognition, 431, 1–29. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Devoto, G., & Oli, G. C. (1967). Vocabolario illustrato della lingua italiana. Milan: Le Monnier (Selezione dal Reader’s Digest).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Edelman, D. (1999). On the history of non-decimal systems and their elements in numerals of Aryan languages. In J. Gvozdanović (Ed.), Numeral types and changes worldwide (pp. 222–241). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fauconnier, G. (1997). Mappings in thought and language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gnerre, M. (1995). All’origine dei numerali: conteggiando la temporalità. In Numeri ed istanze di numerazione tra preistoria e protostoria linguistica del Mondo Antico (Proceedings of a conference held in Naples, 1–2. 12. 1995). AIΩN (Annali del Dipartimento di Studi del Mondo Classico e del Mediterraneo Antico, sezione linguistica, Università degli Studi di Napoli “L’Orientale”), 171, 121–159.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Greenberg, J. H. (1978). Generalizations about numeral systems. In J. H. Greenberg, C. A. Ferguson, & E. A. Moravcsik (Eds.), Universals of human language 3: Word structure (pp. 249–295). Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Greene, D. (1992). Celtic. In J. Gvozdanović (Ed.), Indo-European numerals (pp. 497–554). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gvozdanović, J. (Ed.). (1992). Indo-European numerals. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(Ed.). (1999b). Numeral types and changes worldwide. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1999a). Types of numeral changes. In J. Gvozdanović (Ed.), Numeral types and changes worldwide (pp. 95–111). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heine, B. (2004). On genetic motivation in grammar. In G. Radden & K. U. Panther (Eds.), Studies in linguistic motivation (pp. 103–120). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Janda, L. (2011). Metonymy in word formation. Cognitive Linguistics, 22(2), 359–392. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Justus, C. (1999). Pre-decimal structures in counting and metrology. In J. Gvozdanović (Ed.), Numeral types and changes worldwide (pp. 55–79). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koch, P. (1999). On the cognitive basis of metonymy and certain types of word formation. In K. U. Panther & G. Radden (Eds.), Metonymy in language and thought (pp. 139–167). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koskela, A. (2011). Metonymy, category broadening and narrowing, an vertical polysemy. In R. Benczes, A. Barcelona, & F. J. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez (Eds.), Defining metonymy in Cognitive Linguistics: Towards a consensus view (pp. 125–146). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kövecses, Z., & Radden, G. (1998). Metonymy: Developing a cognitive linguistic view. Cognitive Linguistics, 91, 37–77. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langacker, R. W. (1993). Reference-point constructions. Cognitive Linguistics, 4(1), 1–38. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1999). Grammar and Conceptualization. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2009). Metonymic grammar. In K. U. Panther, L. L. Thornburg, & A. Barcelona (Eds.), Metonymy and metaphor in grammar (pp. 45–71). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Link, T., Huber, S., Nuerk, H. C., & Moeller, K. (2013). Unbounding the mental number line: New evidence on children’s spatial representation of numbers. Frontiers in Psychology, 41, 1021. [URL]
Loewe, R. (1936). Die Vierzählweise der Indogermanen. Indogermanische Forschungen, 541, 190–205. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Luján Martínez, E. R. (1999). The Indo-European system of numerals from ‘1’ to ‘10’. In J. Gvozdanović (Ed.), Numeral types and changes worldwide (pp. 199–219). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Merlini Barbaresi, L. (2004). Alterazione. In M. Grossmann & F. Rainer (Eds.), La formazione delle parole italiano (pp. 264–292). Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moyer, R. S., & Landauer, T. K. (1967). Time required for judgments of numerical inequality. Nature, 2151, 1519–520. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nerlich, B. (2006). Metonymy. In K. Brown (Ed.). Encyclopedia of language & linguistics (2nd ed.) (pp. 109–113). Amsterdam: Elsevier. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pannain, R. (1995). Numeri e numerazione: Implicazioni psicologiche ed aspetti evolutivi. AIΩN (Annali del Dipartimento di Studi del Mondo Classico e del Mediterraneo Antico, sezione linguistica, Università degli Studi di Napoli “L’Orientale”), 171, 219–236.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pannain, R. (2000). Numerali ed istanze di numerazione: Note per un progetto di tipologia areale dei numerali. AIΩN (Annali del Dipartimento di Studi del Mondo Classico e del Mediterraneo Antico, sezione linguistica, Università degli Studi di Napoli “L’Orientale”), 221, 63–103.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2007). La varietà nella numerazione e la questione della vigesimalità in Italia meridionale. AIΩN (Annali del Dipartimento di Studi del Mondo Classico e del Mediterraneo Antico, sezione linguistica, Università degli Studi di Napoli “L’Orientale”), 291, 73–97.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pannain, R., & Riccio, A. (2014). Cardinal numerals: a syntax-semantics interface analysis. In R. Simone & F. Masini (Eds.), Word classes: Nature, typology and representations (pp. 161–180). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Panther, K. U., & Thornburg, L. L. (2007). Metonymy. In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens, (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 236–63). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(forthcoming). What kind of reasoning mode is metonymy? In O. Blanco-Carrión, A. Barcelona, & R. Pannain (Eds.), Conceptual metonymy: Methodological, theoretical and descriptive issues. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.
Price, G. (1992). Romance. In J. Gvozdanović (Ed.), Indo-European numerals (pp. 447–469). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Restle, F. (1970). Speed of adding and comparing numbers. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 831, 274–278. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rischel, J. (1997). Typology and reconstruction of numeral systems: The case of Austroasiatic. In J. Fisiak (Ed.), Linguistic reconstruction and typology (pp. 273–312). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rohlfs, G. (1969). Grammatica storica della lingua italiana e dei suoi dialetti: Sintassi e formazione delle parole. Turin: Einaudi (PBE).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rosch, E. (1975). Cognitive reference points. Cognitive Psychology, 71, 532–547. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ross, A. S. C., & Berns, J. (1992). Germanic. In J. Gvozdanović (Ed.), Indo-European numerals (pp. 555–716). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Saussure, F. (1916). Cours de linguistique générale (ed. by C. Bally & A. Sechehaye, with the collaboration of A. Riedlinger). Paris/Lausanne: Payot.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sigurd, B. (1988). Round numbers. Language in Society, 171, 243–252. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Silvestri, D. (2002). I lessici tematici tra lingua standard e lessici scientifici. AIΩN (Annali del Dipartimento di Studi del Mondo Classico e del Mediterraneo Antico, sezione linguistica, Università degli Studi di Napoli “L’Orientale”), 241, 11–30.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2010). Parole per mangiare, parole per contare, parole per parlare. In N. Pantera, A. Mendicino, & C. Citraro (Eds.). Parole: Il lessico come strumento per organizzare e trasmettere gli etnosaperi, Atti del Convegno (Università della Calabria, 2–4 luglio 2009) (pp. 743–765). Rende: Università della Calabria, Centro Editoriale e Librario.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Simpson, J. A., & Weiner, E. S. C. (1989). The Oxford English dictionary (2nd ed.). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Strudsholm, E. (2011). Quanto è difficile tradurre i numerali: Il caso del danese. In C. Bazzanella (Ed.) Numeri per parlare: Da “quattro chiacchiere” a “grazie mille” (pp. 117–149). Roma/Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Szemerényi, O. (1960). Studies in the Indo-European system of numerals. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taylor, J. R. (1995). Linguistic categorization: Prototypes in linguistic theory (2nd edition). Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tribushinina, E. (2008). Cognitive reference points: Semantics beyond the prototypes in adjectives of space and colour. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Winter, W. (1992). Some thoughts about Indo-European numerals. In J. Gvozdanović (Ed.), Indo-European numerals (pp. 11–28). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zaslavsky, C. (1979). Africa counts: Number and pattern in African culture. Chicago: Lawrence Hill Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Corpora
La Repubblica corpus, [URL]
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Sun, Yi & Mocheng Lin
2025. A bibliometric analysis of metonymy in SSCI-indexed research (2000–2023): retrospect and prospect. Frontiers in Psychology 16 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue