Review published In: Applying Cognitive Linguistics: Figurative language in use, constructions and typology
Edited by Ana M. Piquer-Píriz and Rafael Alejo-González
[Review of Cognitive Linguistics 14:1] 2016
► pp. 235–245
Book review
. Romance perspectives on Construction Grammar. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2014. 316 pp.
Published online: 7 July 2016
https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.14.1.10gil
https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.14.1.10gil
References (12)
Aske, J. (1989). Path predicates in English and Spanish: A closer look. In K. Hall, M. Meacham, & R. Shapiro (eds.), Proceedings of the fifteenth annual meeting of the Berkeley linguistics society (pp. 1–14). Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.
Bîlbîie, G. (in prep.). Gapping and right node raising in the English Penn Treebank. Manuscript, LLF & Université Paris 7.
Boas, H. C. (ed.). (2010). Contrastive studies in construction grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Fried, M., & Östman, J. O. (eds.). (2004). Construction grammar in a cross-language perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Goldberg, A. E. (1995). Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hoffmann, T., & Trousdale, G. (eds.). (2013). The Oxford handbook of construction grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Newmeyer, F. J. (2010). What conversational English tells us about the nature of grammar: A critique of Thompson’s analysis of object complements. In K. Boye & E. Engberg-Pedersen (eds.), Language use and language structure (pp. 3–43). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Thompson, S. A. (2002). ‘Object complements’ and conversation: Towards a realistic account. Studies in Language, 261, 125–163.
