Cover not available

Article published In: Applying Cognitive Linguistics: Figurative language in use, constructions and typology
Edited by Ana M. Piquer-Píriz and Rafael Alejo-González
[Review of Cognitive Linguistics 14:1] 2016
► pp. 5172

Get fulltext from our e-platform
References (19)
Barcelona, A. (2002). Clarifying and applying the notions of metaphor and metonymy within cognitive linguistics: An update. In R. Dirven & R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast (pp. 207-277). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barnden, J. (2010). Metaphor and metonymy: Making their connections more slippery. Cognitive Linguistics, 21(1), 1-34. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brdar, M., & Brdar-Szabó, R. (2003). Metonymic coding of linguistic action in English, Croatian and Hungarian. In K.U. Panther & L. Thornburg (Eds.), Metonymy and pragmatic inferencing (pp. 241-266). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
British national corpus at Brigham Young University (BYU-BNC), accessed via [URL]
Chen, Y.C, & Lai, H.L. (2012). EFL learners’ awareness of the metonymy-metaphor continuum in figurative expressions. Language Awareness, 21(3), 235-248. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dirven, R. (2003). Metonymy and metaphor: Different mental strategies of conceptualisation [1993]. In R. Dirven & R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast (pp. 75-112). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldberg, A. (2006). Constructions at work. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goossens, L. (2002). Metaphtonymy: The interaction of metaphor and metonymy in expressions for linguistic action. In R. Dirven & R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast (pp. 349-377). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kövecses, Z. (2002). Metaphor: A practical introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kövecses, Z., & Radden, G. (1998). Metonymy: Developing a cognitive linguistic view. Cognitive Linguistics, 91, 37-78. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langacker, R.W. (2009). Investigations in cognitive grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Littlemore, J. (2001). The use of metaphor in university lectures and the problems that it causes for overseas students. Teaching in Higher Education, 61, 333–351. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2015). Metonymy: Hidden shortcuts in language, thought and communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Littlemore, J., Chen, P.T., Koester, A., & Barnden, J. (2011). Difficulties in metaphoric comprehension faced by international students whose first language is not English. Applied Linguistics, 23(1), 1-23.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Littlemore, J., & Low, G. (2006). Figurative thinking and foreign language learning. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Piquer-Piriz, A. (2008). Reasoning figuratively in early EFL: Some implications for the development of vocabulary. In F. Boers & S. Lindstromberg (Eds.), Cognitive linguistic approaches to teaching vocabulary and phraseology (pp. 219-240). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Radden, G., & Kövecses, Z. (1999). Towards and theory of metonymy. In K U. Panther & G. Radden (Eds.), Metonymy in language and thought (pp. 17-59). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (6)

Cited by six other publications

Christodoulakis, Christos & Paraskevi Thomou
Littlemore, Jeannette
2023. ‘You’ll find Jane Austen in the basement’ … or Will You? Metonymy and Second Language Learning. In Applying Cognitive Linguistics to Second Language Learning and Teaching,  pp. 143 ff. DOI logo
Dyrmo, Tomasz
2022. Do we need Queer Cognitive Linguistics?. tekst i dyskurs - text und diskurs :16 (2022)  pp. 241 ff. DOI logo
Dyrmo, Tomasz
2024. Figurativeness of the Japanese flag. Review of Cognitive Linguistics DOI logo
Martín-Gascón, Beatriz
2022. Metonymy in Spanish/L2 Teaching: A Cognitive Analysis of Color Idioms and Their Inclusion in the Córdoba Project Database. In Computational and Corpus-Based Phraseology [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 13528],  pp. 146 ff. DOI logo
Zibin, Aseel, Abdel Rahman Mitib Altakhaineh & Elham T. Hussein
2020. On the comprehension of metonymical expressions by Arabic-speaking EFL learners: A cognitive linguistic approach. Topics in Linguistics 21:1  pp. 45 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue