Article published In: Applying Cognitive Linguistics: Figurative language in use, constructions and typology
Edited by Ana M. Piquer-Píriz and Rafael Alejo-González
[Review of Cognitive Linguistics 14:1] 2016
► pp. 51–72
The interpretation of metonymy by Japanese learners of English
Published online: 7 July 2016
https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.14.1.03lit
https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.14.1.03lit
Figurative language can present both difficulties and opportunities in cross-linguistic and cross-cultural communication. Previous studies have focused on difficulties in metaphor comprehension by speakers of different languages, but metonymy comprehension is a relatively under-researched area. In this paper, we describe a two-part study exploring metonymy comprehension by Japanese learners of English. In the first part of the study, ten Japanese learners of English were asked to explain the meanings of twenty expressions instantiating a range of metonymy types. Comprehension problems included: the missing of, or misuse of, contextual clues; positive and negative interference from Japanese; ‘underspecification’; and a tendency to interpret metonyms as if they were metaphors. The second part of the study focused on the functions performed by metonymy. Twenty-two Japanese learners of English were asked to interpret a set of twenty metonyms, each of which performed a particular function. Metonyms involving humour and irony appeared to be more difficult to understand than ones serving other functions, such as indirect reference and evaluation.
References (19)
Barcelona, A. (2002). Clarifying and applying the notions of metaphor and metonymy within cognitive linguistics: An update. In R. Dirven & R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast (pp. 207-277). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Barnden, J. (2010). Metaphor and metonymy: Making their connections more slippery. Cognitive Linguistics, 21(1), 1-34.
Brdar, M., & Brdar-Szabó, R. (2003). Metonymic coding of linguistic action in English, Croatian and Hungarian. In K.U. Panther & L. Thornburg (Eds.), Metonymy and pragmatic inferencing (pp. 241-266). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
British national corpus at Brigham Young University (BYU-BNC), accessed via [URL]
Chen, Y.C, & Lai, H.L. (2012). EFL learners’ awareness of the metonymy-metaphor continuum in figurative expressions. Language Awareness, 21(3), 235-248.
Deignan, A.H. (2005). Metaphor and corpus linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Dirven, R. (2003). Metonymy and metaphor: Different mental strategies of conceptualisation [1993]. In R. Dirven & R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast (pp. 75-112). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Goossens, L. (2002). Metaphtonymy: The interaction of metaphor and metonymy in expressions for linguistic action. In R. Dirven & R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast (pp. 349-377). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Kövecses, Z., & Radden, G. (1998). Metonymy: Developing a cognitive linguistic view. Cognitive Linguistics, 91, 37-78.
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Littlemore, J. (2001). The use of metaphor in university lectures and the problems that it causes for overseas students. Teaching in Higher Education, 61, 333–351.
. (2015). Metonymy: Hidden shortcuts in language, thought and communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Littlemore, J., Chen, P.T., Koester, A., & Barnden, J. (2011). Difficulties in metaphoric comprehension faced by international students whose first language is not English. Applied Linguistics, 23(1), 1-23.
Littlemore, J., & Low, G. (2006). Figurative thinking and foreign language learning. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
Piquer-Piriz, A. (2008). Reasoning figuratively in early EFL: Some implications for the development of vocabulary. In F. Boers & S. Lindstromberg (Eds.), Cognitive linguistic approaches to teaching vocabulary and phraseology (pp. 219-240). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Radden, G., & Kövecses, Z. (1999). Towards and theory of metonymy. In K U. Panther & G. Radden (Eds.), Metonymy in language and thought (pp. 17-59). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Cited by (6)
Cited by six other publications
Christodoulakis, Christos & Paraskevi Thomou
2024. Investigating metaphor comprehension strategies of young Second Language students of Greek. Review of Cognitive Linguistics
Littlemore, Jeannette
Dyrmo, Tomasz
Dyrmo, Tomasz
Martín-Gascón, Beatriz
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
