Cover not available

Article published In: Applying Cognitive Linguistics: Figurative language in use, constructions and typology
Edited by Ana M. Piquer-Píriz and Rafael Alejo-González
[Review of Cognitive Linguistics 14:1] 2016
► pp. 1–20

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Applying Cognitive Linguistics

Identifying some current research foci (figurative language in use, constructions and typology)

Published online: 7 July 2016
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.14.1.01piq
In recent years, Cognitive Linguistics (CL) has established itself not only as a solid theoretical approach but also as an important source from which different applications to other fields have emerged. In this introductory article, we explore some of the current, most relevant topics in applied CL-oriented studies grouped into three main strands: Analyses of figurative language (both metaphor and metonymy) in use, constructions and typology. An outline of the contents of the eight chapters included in this special issue is provided, explaining their contributions to these research areas and highlighting their methodological rigour.
References (120)
Achard, M., & Niemeier, S. (Eds.). (2004). Cognitive Linguistics, second language acquisition, and foreign language teaching. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2010b). Where does the money go? An analysis of the container metaphor in economics: The market and the economy. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(4), 1137–1150. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aske, J. (1989). Path predicates in English and Spanish: A closer look. In K. Hall, M. Meacham, & R. Shapiro (Eds.), Proceedings of the fifteenth annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (pp. 1–14). Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barcelona, A. (Ed.) (2000). Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads: A cognitive perspective. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2003). Metonymy in Cognitive Linguistics: An analysis and a few modest proposals. In H. Cuyckens, K.U. Panther, & T. Berg (Eds.), Motivation in language: Studies in honor of Günter Radden (pp. 223–255). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barcelona, A., & Valenzuela, J. (2011). An overview of cognitive linguistics. In M. Brdar, S.T. Gries, & M.Z. Fuchs (Eds.), Cognitive Linguistics: Convergence and expansion (pp. 17–44). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beger, A. (2011). Deliberate metaphors?: An exploration of the choice and functions of metaphors in US-American college lectures. metaphorik.de, 201, 39–60.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Benczes, R., Barcelona, A., & Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F.J. (Eds.). (2011). Defining metonymy in cognitive linguistics: Towards a consensus view. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bielak, J. (2011). Cognitive linguistics and foreign language pedagogy: An overview of recent trends and developments. In M. Pawlak (Ed.), Extending the boundaries of research on second language learning and teaching (pp. 241–262) Heidelberg: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blumenthal-Dramé, A. (2012). Entrenchment in usage-based theories: What corpus data do and do not reveal about the mind. Berlin: Walter De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boers, F. (2000). Metaphor awareness and vocabulary retention. Applied Linguistics, 21(4), 553–571. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2014). Cognitive Linguistics and language pedagogy: Finding ways forward. Paper presented at the 9th AELCO International conference , Badajoz, Spain.
Boers, F., & Demecheleer, M. (1998). A cognitive semantic approach to teaching prepositions. English Language Teaching Journal, 531, 197–204. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boers, F., De Rycker, A., & De Knop. S. (2010). Fostering language teaching efficiency through cognitive linguistics: Introduction. In S. De Knop , F. Boers, & A. De Rycker (Eds.), Fostering language teaching efficiency through Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 1–26). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boers, F., & Lindstromberg, S. (2006) Cognitive Linguistic approaches to second or foreign language instruction: Rationale, proposals and evaluation. In G. Kristaensen, R. Dirven, M. Achard, & F.J. Ruiz-Mendoza (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics: Current applications and future perspectives (pp. 305–358). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (Eds.). (2008). Cognitive linguistic approaches to teaching vocabulary and phraseology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2009). Optimizing a lexical approach to instructed second language acquisition. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boers, F., Piquer-Píriz, A. Mª, Stengers, H., & Eyckmans, J. (2009). Does pictorial elucidation foster recollection of idioms? Language Teaching Research, 13(4), 367–382. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brooks, P.J., & Tomasello, M. (1999a). Young children learn to produce passives with nonce verbs. Developmental Psychology, 35(1), 29–44. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1999b). How children constrain their argument structure constructions. Language, 751, 720–738. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Butler, C.S. (2009). The Lexical Constructional Model: Genesis, strengths and challenges. In C.S. Butler & J. Martín Arista (Eds.), Deconstructing constructions (pp. 117–152). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Caballero, R. (2006). Re-viewing space: Figurative language in architects’ assessment of built space. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Caballero, R., & Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I. (forthcoming) And yet they DON’T move: A genre approach to metaphorical motion. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Caballero, R., & Suárez-Toste, E. (2008). Translating the senses: Teaching the metaphors in winespeak. In F. Boers & S. Lindstromberg, (Eds.), Cognitive linguistic approaches to teaching vocabulary and phraseology (241–259). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cadierno, T. (2004). Expressing motion events in a second language: A cognitive typological perspective. In M. Achard & S. Neimeier (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics, second language acquisition, and foreign language teaching (pp.13–49). The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cadierno, T., & Lund, K. (2004). Cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition: Motion events in a typological framework. In B. VanPatten, J. Williams, S. Rott, & M. Overstreet (Eds.), Form-meaning connections in second language acquisition (pp. 139–154). Hillsdale, N.J: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cadierno, T., & Ruiz, L. (2006). Motion events in Spanish L2 acquisition. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 4(1), 183–216. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cameron, L. (2003). Metaphor in educational discourse. London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Charteris-Black, J. (2005). Politicians and rhetoric: The persuasive power of metaphor. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cienki, A., & Müller, C. (Eds.). (2008). Metaphor and gesture. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Condon, N. (2008). How cognitive linguistic motivations influence the phrasal verbs. In F. Boers & S. Lindstromberg (Eds.), Cognitive linguistic approaches to teaching vocabulary and phraseology (pp. 133–158). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Croft, W. (2001). Radical construction grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2007). Construction grammar. In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuykens (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 463–508). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Croft, W., & Cruse, D.A. (2004). Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cuenca, M.J., & Hilferty, J. (1999). Introducción a la lingüística cognitiva. Barcelona: Ariel.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dabrowska, E. (2009). Constructing a second language: Some final thoughts. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 7(1), 277–290. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dabrowska, E., & Divjak, D. (Eds.). (2015). Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Deignan, A., Gabrys, D., & Solska, A. (1997). Teaching English metaphors using cross-linguistic awareness-raising activities. English Language Teaching Journal, 51(4), 352–360. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Deignan, A., Littlemore, J., & Semino, E. (2013). Figurative language, genre and register. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Knop, S., Boers, F., & De Rycker, T. (Eds.). (2010). Fostering language teaching efficiency through Cognitive Linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dirven, R. (2001). English phrasal verbs: Theory and didactic application. In M. Pütz, S. Niemeier, & R. Dirven (Eds.), Applied Cognitive Linguistics II: Language pedagogy (pp. 3–27). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ellis, N.C. (2010). Construction learning as category learning. In M. Pütz & L. Sicola (Eds.), Cognitive processing and second language acquisition (pp. 27–48). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ellis, N.C., & Cadierno, T. (2009). Constructing a second language: Introduction to the Special Section. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 7(1), 111–139. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ellis, N.C., & Ferreira-Junior, F. (2009). Constructions and their acquisition Islands and the distinctiveness of their occupancy. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 7(1), 187–220.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ellis, N.C., & O’Donnell, M. (2011). Robust language acquisition: An emergent consequence of language as a complex adaptive system. In L. Carlson, C. Hölscher, & T. Shipley (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 3512–3517). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
Ellis, N.C., O’Donnell, M., & Römer, U. (2015). Usage-based language learning. In B. MacWhinney & W. O’Grady (Eds.), The handbook of language emergence (pp. 163–180). Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ellis, N.C., & Robinson, P. (2008). An introduction to cognitive linguistics, second language acquisition, and language instruction. In P. Robinson & N. Ellis (Eds.), The handbook of Cognitive Linguistics and second language acquisition (pp. 3–23). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Evans, V., Bergen, B.K., & Zinken, J. (2007a). (Eds.). The Cognitive Linguistics reader. London: Equinox.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2007b). The Cognitive Linguistics enterprise: An overview. In V. Evans, B.K. Bergen, & J. Zinken (Eds.), The Cognitive Linguistics reader (pp. 2–36). London: Equinox.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Evans, V., & Green, M. (2006). Cognitive linguistics: An introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Filipović, L., & Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I. (2015). Motion. In E. Dabrowska & D. Divjak (Eds.), Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 526–537). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fillmore, C.J., & Kay, P. (1993). Construction grammar coursebook: Chapters 1 thru 11. Berkeley: University of California Berkeley.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Geeraerts, D., & Cuyckens, H. (2007a). Introducing cognitive linguistics. In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 3–21). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (Eds.). (2007b). The Oxford handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibbs, R.W. (1994). The poetics of mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2001). Evaluating contemporary models of figurative language understanding. Metaphor and Symbol, 161, 317–333. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibbs, R.W. (Ed.). (2008). The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibbs, R.W. (2015). Metaphor. In E. Dabrowska & D. Divjak (Eds.), Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 167–189). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldberg, A. (1995). Constructions: A Construction Grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldberg, A.E. (2013). Constructionist approaches. In T. Hoffmann & G. Trousdale (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of construction grammar (pp. 15–31). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gonzálvez-García, F., & Butler, C.S. (2006). Mapping functional-cognitive space. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 4(1), 39–96. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Han, Z., & Cadierno, T. (Eds.). (2010). Linguistic relativity in SLA: Thinking for speaking. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Herrera-Soler, H., & White, M. (Eds.). (2012). Metaphor and mills: Figurative language in business and economics. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Herrmann, J.B. (2013). Metaphor in academic discourse: Linguistic forms, conceptual structures, communicative functions and cognitive representations. VU University, Amsterdam.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hijazo-Gascón, A., & Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I. (2013). Las lenguas románicas y la tipología de los eventos de movimiento. Romanische Forschungen, 125(4), 467–494. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hoffmann, T., & Trousdale, G. (2013). The Oxford handbook of construction grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holme, R. (2009). Cognitive linguistics and language teaching. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I. (2009). Path salience in motion events. In E.L.J. Guo, N. Budwig, S. Ervin-Tripp, N. Nakamura, & S. Özçaliskan (Eds.), Crosslinguistic approaches to the psychology of language: Research in the tradition of Dan Isaac Slobin (pp. 403–14). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I., & Valenzuela, J. (Eds.). (2012). Lingüística cognitiva. Barcelona: Anthropos.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Imbert, C. (2012). Path: Ways typology has walked through it. Language and Linguistics Compass, 6(4), 236–258. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jarvis, S., & Pavlenko, A. (2008). Crosslinguistic influence in language and cognition. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kaschak, M.P., & Glenberg, A.M. (2000). Constructing meaning: The role of affordances and grammatical constructions in sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 431, 508–529. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koller, V. (2004). Metaphor and gender in business media discourse: A critical cognitive study. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kövecses, Z. (2002). Metaphor: A practical introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2005). Metaphor in culture: Universality and variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kövecses, Z., & Radden, G. (1998). Metonymy: Developing a cognitive linguistic view. Cognitive Linguistics, 9(1), 37–78. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kövecses, Z., & Szabó, P. (1996). Idioms: A view from Cognitive Semantics. Applied Linguistics, 17(3), 326–355. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kristiansen, G., Achard, M., Dirven, R., & Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F.J. (Eds.). (2006). Cognitive Linguistics: Current applications and future perspectives. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1993). The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (2nd edition) (pp. 202–251). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langacker, R.W. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar. Vol. 1, Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Standford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lazar, G. (1996). Using figurative language to expand students’ vocabulary. English Language Teaching Journal, 50(1), 43–51. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2003). Meanings and metaphor: Activities to practise figurative language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lindstromberg, S. (1996). Prepositions: Meaning and method. English Language Teaching Journal, 50(3), 225–236. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2010). English prepositions explained (revised edition). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Littlemore, J. (2009). Applying Cognitive Linguistics to second language learning and teaching. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2015). Metonymy. Hidden shortcuts in language, thought and communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Littlemore, J., Chen, P., Barnden, J., & Koester, A. (2011). Difficulties in metaphor comprehension faced by international students whose first language is not English. Applied Linguistics, 32(4), 208–429. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Littlemore, J., & Juchem-Grundmann, C. (Eds.). (2010). Applied Cognitive Linguistics in second language learning and teaching. AILA Review, 23 (special issue). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Littlemore, J., & Low, G. (2006). Figurative thinking and foreign language learning. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Littlemore, J., & Taylor, J.R. (Eds.). (2014). The Bloomsbury companion to cognitive linguistics. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Low, G. (1988). On teaching metaphor. Applied linguistics, 9(2), 125–147. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Low, G., Littlemore, J., & Koester, A. (2008). The use of metaphor in three university academic lectures. Applied Linguistics, 29(3), 428–455. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
MacArthur, F., & Littlemore, J. (2008). A discovery approach using corpora in the foreign language classroom. In F. Boers & S. Lindstromberg (Eds.), Cognitive linguistic approaches to teaching vocabulary and phraseology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
MacLennan, C.H. (1994). Metaphors and prototypes in the learning teaching of grammar and vocabulary. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 32(3), 97–110. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Musolff, A. (2004). Metaphor and political discourse: Analogical reasoning in debates about Europe. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Odlin, T. (1989). Language transfer: Cross-linguistic influence in language learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2005). Metaphor meets typology: Ways of moving metaphorically in English and Turkish. Cognitive Linguistics, 16(1): 207−246. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2015). Ways of crossing a spatial boundary in typologically distinct languages. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36(2), 485–508. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Panther, K.U., & Radden, G. (Eds.). (1999). Metonymy in language and thought. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Piquer-Píriz, A.M. (2008). Reasoning figuratively in early EFL: Some implications for the development of vocabulary. In F. Boers & S. Lindstromberg (Eds.), Cognitive linguistic approaches to teaching vocabulary and phraseology (pp. 219–240). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ponterotto, D. (1994). Metaphors we can learn by. English Teaching Forum, 32(3), 2–7. [URL].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pütz, M., Niemeier, S., & Dirven, R. (Eds.). (2001a). Applied Cognitive Linguistics I: Theory and language acquisition. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (Eds.). (2001b). Applied Cognitive Linguistics II: Language pedagogy. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Robinson, P., & Ellis, N. (2008). The handbook of Cognitive Linguistics and second language acquisition. New York: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rudzka-Ostyn, B. (2003). Word power: Phrasal verbs and compounds. A cognitive approach. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schmid, H., & Ungerer, F. (2013). Cognitive linguistics. In J. Simpson (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp. 611–624). Oxford: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Slobin, D. (2004). The many ways to search for a frog: linguistic typology and the expression of motion events. In S. Strömqvist & L. Verhoeven (Eds.), Relating events in narrative: Typological and contextual perspectives (pp. 219–57). Mahawah, NJ/London: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Slobin, D.I. (1996). Two ways to travel: Verbs of motion in English and Spanish. In M. Shibatani, and S.A. Thompson (Eds.), Grammatical constructions: Their form and meaning (pp.195–219). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stefanowitsch, A., & Gries, S.T. (2003). Collostructions: Investigating the interaction of words and constructions. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 8(2), 209–243. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Talmy, L. (1985). Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In T. Shopen (Ed.) Language typology and syntactic description (Vol. 31) (pp. 57–149). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2000). Toward a cognitive semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ungerer, F., & Schmid, H.J. (1996)[2008]. An introduction to Cognitive Linguistics. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van der Auwera, J., & Nuyts, J. (2007). Cognitive linguistics and linguistic typology. In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuykens (Eds.), Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 1074–1091). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilcox, P. (2000). Metaphor in American Sign Language. Washington, D.C.: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Llopis-García, Reyes & Ana M. Piquer-Píriz
2024. Introduction. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 22:2 ► pp. 301 ff. DOI logo
Piquer-Píriz, Ana M. & Marta Martín-Gilete
2024. Applying Cognitive Linguistics to elucidate the meanings of the particles IN/OUT and UP/DOWN in L2 classrooms. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 22:2 ► pp. 450 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue