Cover not available

Article published In: Expressing and Describing Surprise
Edited by Agnès Celle and Laure Lansari
[Review of Cognitive Linguistics 13:2] 2015
► pp. 436–460

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Surprise in the GRID

Published online: 31 December 2015
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.13.2.07sor
This paper analyses surprise in the framework of the GRID paradigm as part of a research project on the meaning of emotion words across languages and cultures. Based on psychological component theories of emotion, an online instrument was designed to rate the meaning of 24 emotion terms on 142 features of emotion. Data was collected for 23 languages in 27 countries. The mean rates within and across languages offer a semantic profile of the emotion terms. Results are presented on the meaning of “surprise” across languages and in English and French. The data also indicate four dimensions are necessary to describe the emotion space: valence, power, arousal and novelty. Novelty captures variation in suddenness and expectedness and differentiates surprise from other emotions, as well as types of emotion within a family, revealing itself as a relevant aspect of emotion universally encoded in our affective lexicons.
References (68)
Averill, J. (1980). A constructivist view of emotion. In R. Plutchik & H. Kellerman (Eds.), Emotion: Theory, research, and experience (pp. 305–340). New York: Academic Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barrett, L.F. (2006). Valence as a basic building block of emotional life. Journal of Research in Personality, 401, 35–55. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barrett, L.F., Mesquita, B., Ochsner, K.N., & Gross, J.J. (2007). The experience of emotion. Annual Review of Psychology, 581, 373–403. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brosch, T. (2009). Novelty (in appraisal). In D. Sander & K.R. Scherer (Eds.), The Oxford companion to emotion and the affective sciences (pp. 285). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cattell, R.B. (1943). The description of personality: Basic traits resolved into clusters. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 381, 476–506. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1945). The description of personality: Principles and findings in a factor analysis. American Journal of Psychology, 581, 69–90. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulleting, 112(1), 155–159. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cook, V.J. (1992). Evidence for multi-competence. Language Learning, 421, 557–591. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2002). Introduction: Background to the L2 user. In V. Cook (Ed.), Portraits of the L2 user (pp. 1–28). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Darwin, C. (1872). The expression of emotions in man and animals (3rd edition., ed. P. Ekman). New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
DeLancey, S. (1997). Mirativity: The grammatical marking of unexpected information. Linguistic Typology, 1(1), 33–52. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2012). Still mirative after all these years. Linguistic Typology, 16(3), 529–564.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ekman, P. (1989). The argument and evidence of universals in facial expressions of emotions. In H. Wagner & A. Manstead (Eds.), Handbook of psychophysiology: The biological psychology of emotions and social processes (pp. 143–164). London: John Wiley.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1992). An argument for basic emotions. Cognition & Emotion, 61, 169–200. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ekman, P., & Friesen, W.V. (1971). Constants across cultures in face and emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 171, 124–129. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ekman, P., Friesen, W.V., & Ellsworth, P. (1982). What emotion categories or dimensions can observers judge from facial behavior? In P. Ekman (Ed.), Emotion in the human face (pp. 39–55). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ekman, P., Sorenson, E.R., & Friesen, W.V. (1969). Pan-cultural elements in facial displays of emotion. Science, 164(3875), 86–88. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fehr, B., & Russell, J.A. (1984). Concept of emotion viewed from a prototype perspective. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1131, 464–486. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fontaine, J.R.J. (2013). Dimensional, basic emotion and componential approaches to meaning in psychological emotion research. In J.R.J. Fontaine, K.R. Scherer, & C. Soriano (Eds.), Components of emotional meaning: A sourcebook (pp. 31–45). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fontaine, J.R.J., Poortinga, Y.H., Setiadi, B., & Markam, S.S. (2002). Cognitive structure of emotion terms in Indonesia and The Netherlands. Cognition & Emotion, 161, 61–86. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fontaine, J.R.J., & Scherer, K.R. (2013). The global meaning structure of the emotion domain: Investigating the complementarity of multiple perspectives on meaning. In J.R.J. Fontaine, K.R. Scherer, & C. Soriano (Eds.), Components of emotional meaning: A sourcebook (pp. 106–125). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fontaine, J.R.J., Scherer, K.R., Roesch, E.B., & Ellsworth, P. (2007). The world of emotion is not two-dimensional. Psychological Science, 181, 1050–1057. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fontaine, J.R.J., Scherer, K.R. & Soriano, C. (Eds.). (2013a). Components of emotional meaning: A sourcebook. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2013b). The why, the what, and the how of the GRID instrument. In J.R.J. Fontaine, K.R. Scherer, & C. Soriano (Eds.), Components of emotional meaning: A sourcebook (pp. 83–97). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fontaine, J.R.J., & Veirman, E. (2013). The new novelty dimension: Method artifact or basic dimension in the cognitive structure of the emotion domain? In J.R.J. Fontaine, K.R. Scherer, & C. Soriano (Eds.), Components of emotional meaning: A sourcebook (pp. 233–242). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fontaine, J.R.J., Veirman, E., & Groenvynck, H. (2013). From meaning to experience: The dimensional structure of emotional experiences. In J.R.J. Fontaine, K.R. Scherer, & C. Soriano (Eds.), Components of emotional meaning: A sourcebook (pp. 243–260). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frijda, N. (1987). The emotions: Studies in emotion and social interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gehm, T., & Scherer, K.R. (1988). Factors determining the dimensions of subjective emotional space. In K.R. Scherer (Ed.), Facets of emotion: Recent research (pp. 99–114). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gillioz, C., Fontaine, J.R.J., Scherer. K.R., & Soriano, C. (submitted). Mapping emotion terms into affective space: Further evidence for a four-dimensional structure.
Izard, C.E. (1971). The face of emotion. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1977). Human emotions. New York: Plenum Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jakubicek, M., Kilgarriff, A., Kovar, V., Rychly, P., & Suchomel, V. (2013). The TenTen Corpus Family. Paper presented at 7th International Corpus Linguistics Conference , Lancaster, UK.
Kövecses, Z. (this volume). Surprise as a conceptual category.
Krawczak, K., & Glynn, D. (this volume). Operationalizing mirativity. A usage-based quantitative study of constructional construal in English.
Larsen, R.J., & Diener, E. (1992). Promises and problems with the circumplex model of emotion. Review of Personality and Social Psychology, 131, 25–59.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lazarus, R.S. (1991). Emotion and adaptation. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Matthews, S. (1998). Evidentiality and mirativity in Cantonese: wo3, wo4, wo5! Proceedings of the international symposium on Chinese languages and linguistics . Academia Sinica.
Meyer, W.U., Niepel, M., Rudolph, U., & Schützwohl, A. (1991). An experimental analysis of surprise. Cognition and Emotion, 51, 295–311. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meyer, W.U., Reisenzein, R., & Schützwohl, A. (1997). Toward a process analysis of emotions: The case of surprise. Motivation and Emotion, 21(3), 251–574. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Niedenthal, P., Auxiette, C., Nugier, A., Dalle, N., Bonin, P., & Fayol, M. (2004). A prototype analysis of the French category “emotion.” Cognition & Emotion, 181, 289–312. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Noordewier, M.K., & Breugelmans, S. (2013). On the valence of surprise. Cognition and Emotion, 27(7), 1326–1334. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ortony, A., Clore, G.L., & Collins, A. (1988). The cognitive structure of emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Osgood, C.E., May, W.H., & Miron, M.S. (1975). Cross-cultural universals of affective meaning. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Osgood, C.E., Suci, G.J., & Tannenbaum, P.H. (1957). The measurement of meaning. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pavlenko, A. (2005). Emotions and multilingualism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Plutchik, R. (1980). A general psychoevolutionary theory of emotion. In R. Plutchik & H. Kellerman (Eds.), Emotion: Theory, research, and experience Vol. 1, Theories of emotion (pp. 3–33). New York: Academic.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reisenzein, R. (2000). Exploring the strength of association between the components of emotion syndromes: The case of surprise. Cognition and Emotion, 141, 1–34. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reisenzein, R., & Meyer, W.U. (2009). Surprise. In D. Sander & K.R. Scherer (Eds.), The Oxford companion to emotion and the affective sciences (pp. 386–387). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rosch, E. (1975). Cognitive representation of semantic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 104(3), 192–233. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rosch, E., & Mervis, C.B. (1975). Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology, 7(4), 573–605. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Russell, J.A. (1980). A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 391, 1161–1178. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1991). In defense of a prototype approach to emotion concepts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 601, 37–47. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Russell J.A. (2003). Core affect and the psychological construction of emotion. Psychological Review, 1101, 145–72. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Russell, J.A., Lewicka, M., & Niit, T. (1989). A cross-cultural study of a circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 571, 848–856. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Saucier, G., & Goldberg, L.R. (1996). The language of personality: Lexical perspectives on the five-factor model. In J.S. Wiggins (Ed.), The five-factor model of personality: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 21–50). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scherer, K.R. (1984). On the nature and function of emotion: A component process approach. In K.R. Scherer & P. Ekman (Eds.), Approaches to emotion (pp. 293–317). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2005). What are emotions? And how can they be measured? Social Science Information, 441, 695–729. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2009). The dynamic architecture of emotion: Evidence for the component process model. Cognition & Emotion, 231, 1307–1351. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scherer, K.R., Fontaine, J.R.J. & Soriano, C. (2013). CoreGRID and MiniGRID: Development and validation of two short versions of the GRID instrument. In J.R.J. Fontaine, K.R. Scherer, & C. Soriano (Eds.), Components of emotional meaning: A sourcebook (pp. 523–541). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shaver, P., Schwartz, J., Kirson, D., & O’Connor, C. (1987). Emotion knowledge: Further exploration of a prototype approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 521, 1061–1086. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shaver, P., Wu, S., & Schwartz, J. (1992). Cross-cultural similarities and differences in emotion and its representation. A prototype approach. Review of Personality and Social Psychology, 131, 175–212.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sokolov, E.N., Spinks, J.A., Näätänen, R., & Lyytinen, H. (2002). The orienting response in information processing. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Soriano, C., Fontaine, J.R.J., & Scherer, K.R, & GRID collaborators. (2013). Cross-cultural data collection with the GRID instrument. In J.R.J. Fontaine, K.R. Scherer, & C. Soriano (Eds.), Components of emotional meaning: A sourcebook (pp. 98–105). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thayer, R.E. (1989). The biopsychology of mood and arousal. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Torres Bustamante, T. (2012). Real tense and real aspect in mirativity. Proceedings of SALT, 221, 347–364. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van de Vijver, F.J.R., & Leung, K. (1997). Methods and data analysis for cross-cultural research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Watson, D., & Tellegen, A. (1985). Toward a consensual structure of mood. Psychological Bulletin, 981, 219–235. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (15)

Cited by 15 other publications

Soriano, Cristina & Anna Ogarkova
2025. The meaning of ‘frustration’ across languages. Language and Cognition 17 DOI logo
Wang, Yinjie & Agnès Tutin
2025. Tu plaisantes ? Ma parole ! Étude de quelques motifs récurrents exprimant la surprise dans les dialogues romanesques contemporains français. Corpus 27 DOI logo
Wang, Yinjie & Agnès Tutin
2025. Tu plaisantes ? Ma parole ! Étude de quelques motifs récurrents exprimant la surprise dans les dialogues romanesques contemporains français. Corpus 27 DOI logo
Vidal Noguera, Carmen & Irini Mavrou
2024. ‘A surprise I will never forget’: How do adolescent Spanish-German heritage speakers express the emotion of surprise in both their heritage language and the societal language?. International Journal of Bilingualism DOI logo
Vidal Noguera, Carmen & Irini Mavrou
2025. The “emotional brain” of adolescent Spanish–German heritage speakers: is emotional intelligence a proxy for productive emotional vocabulary?. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 28:1 ► pp. 217 ff. DOI logo
Juuse, Liina, Kairi Kreegipuu, Nele Põldver, Annika Kask, Tiit Mogom, Gholamreza Anbarjafari & Jüri Allik
2023. Processing emotions from faces and words measured by event-related brain potentials. Cognition and Emotion 37:5 ► pp. 959 ff. DOI logo
Glynn, Dylan & Avgustina Biryukova
2022. Death, enemies, and illness: How English and Russian metaphorically conceptualise boredom. Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association 10:1 ► pp. 33 ff. DOI logo
Noordewier, Marret K., Daan T. Scheepers, John F. Stins & Muriel A. Hagenaars
2021. On the physiology of interruption after unexpectedness. Biological Psychology 165 ► pp. 108174 ff. DOI logo
Wierzba, Małgorzata, Monika Riegel, Jan Kocoń, Piotr Miłkowski, Arkadiusz Janz, Katarzyna Klessa, Konrad Juszczyk, Barbara Konat, Damian Grimling, Maciej Piasecki & Artur Marchewka
2021. Emotion norms for 6000 Polish word meanings with a direct mapping to the Polish wordnet. Behavior Research Methods 54:5 ► pp. 2146 ff. DOI logo
Loderer, Kristina, Kornelia Gentsch, Melissa C. Duffy, Mingjing Zhu, Xiyao Xie, Jason A. Chavarría, Elisabeth Vogl, Cristina Soriano, Klaus R. Scherer & Reinhard Pekrun
2020. Are concepts of achievement-related emotions universal across cultures? A semantic profiling approach. Cognition and Emotion 34:7 ► pp. 1480 ff. DOI logo
Piata, Anna
2020. Stylistic humor across modalities. Internet Pragmatics 3:2 ► pp. 174 ff. DOI logo
Piata, Anna
2022. Stylistic humor across modalities. In The Pragmatics of Internet Memes [Benjamins Current Topics, 120], ► pp. 36 ff. DOI logo
Alba-Juez, Laura & J. Lachlan Mackenzie
2019. Chapter 1. Emotion processes in discourse. In Emotion in Discourse [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 302], ► pp. 3 ff. DOI logo
Benítez-Castro, Miguel-Ángel & Encarnación Hidalgo-Tenorio
2019. Chapter 12. Rethinking Martin & White’s affect taxonomy. In Emotion in Discourse [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 302], ► pp. 301 ff. DOI logo
Goutéraux, Pascale
2019. Surprise in native, bilingual and non-native spontaneous and stimulated recall speech. In Surprise at the Intersection of Phenomenology and Linguistics [Consciousness & Emotion Book Series, 11], ► pp. 91 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue