Cover not available

Article published In: Expressing and Describing Surprise
Edited by Agnès Celle and Laure Lansari
[Review of Cognitive Linguistics 13:2] 2015
► pp. 270–290

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Surprise as a conceptual category

Published online: 31 December 2015
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.13.2.01kov
In this paper, I examine the concept of surprise from a cognitive linguistic perspective. As previous studies indicate, surprise is a not-quite-prototypical emotion category. My focus will be on the structure and content of surprise as an emotion category, as this can be revealed on the basis of the language speakers of English use to talk about it. As regards methodology, I will follow my earlier work and employ a “lexical approach” to emotion concepts (see, e.g., Kövecses, 1986, 1990, 2000) to explore the language-based folk model of surprise in English. I will investigate the conceptual metaphors and metonymies associated with surprise and will propose a cognitive model for the emotion. It is hoped that this methodology enables us to see why surprise is not a prototypical emotion concept on a par with, for example, anger or fear.
References (43)
Athanasiadou, A., & Tabakowska, E. (Eds.). (1998). Speaking of emotions: Conceptualization and expression. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cameron, L. (2003). Metaphor in educational discourse. London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Celle, A., & Lansari, L. (2014). ‘I’m surprised’/’Are you surprised?’: Surprise as an argumentation tool in verbal interaction. In P. Blumenthal, I. Novakova, & D. Siepmann (Eds.), Les émotions dans le discours/Emotions in discourse (pp. 267–279). Bern/Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Damasio, A. (1994). Descartes’ error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ekman, P., & Friesen, W.V. (1975). Unmasking the face. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ekman, P., Levenson, R.W., & Friesen, W.V. (1983). Autonomic nervous system activity distinguishes among emotions. Science, 2211, 1208–1210. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fontaine, J.J.R., Scherer, K.R., & Soriano, C. (Eds.). (2013). Components of emotional meaning: A sourcebook. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frijda, N.H. (1986). Emotion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibbs, R.W. (1994). The poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language, and understanding. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1999). Taking metaphor out of our heads and putting it into the cultural world In R.W. Gibbs & G.J. Steen (Eds.), Metaphor in cognitive linguistics: Selected papers from the 5th International Cognitive Linguistics Conference (pp. 145–166). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2006). Embodiment and cognitive science. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibbs, R.W., & Colston, H. (2012). Interpreting figurative meaning. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goddard, C. (this volume). The complex, language-specific semantics of “surprise”.
Goossens, L. (1990). Metaphtonymy: The interaction of metaphor and metonymy in the expression of linguistic action. Cognitive Linguistics, 11, 323–340. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Handl, S., & Schmid, H.-J. (Eds.). (2011). Windows to the mind: Metaphor, metonymy and conceptual blending. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holland, D., & Quinn, N. (Eds.). (1987). Cultural models in language and thought. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1990). Emotion concepts. Berlin/New York: Springer Verlag. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2000). Metaphor and emotion. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2002). Metaphor: A practical introduction. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2005). Metaphor in culture: Universality and variation. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2008). Metaphor and emotion. In R.W. Gibbs (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 380–396). Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2010). Metaphor: A practical introduction, 2nd edition. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2011). Methodological issues in conceptual metaphor theory. In S. Handl & H.-J. Schmid (Eds.), Windows to the mind: Metaphor, metonymy and conceptual blending (pp. 23–39). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2015). Where metaphors come from: Reconsidering context in metaphor. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Kövecses, Z. (1987). The cognitive model of anger inherent in American English. In D. Holland & N. Quinn (Eds.), Cultural models in language and thought (pp. 195–221). Cambridge/ New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langacker, R. (1987). Cognitive grammar. Vol. 11. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
LeDoux, J. (1996). The emotional brain. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lutz, C.A. (1988). Unnatural emotions: Everyday sentiments on a Micronesian atoll and their challenge to western theory. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Manstead, A.S.R., Frijda, N., & Fischer, A. (Eds.). (2004). Feelings and emotions: The Amsterdam Symposium. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Niemeier, S., & Dirven, R. (Eds.). (1997). The language of emotions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pragglejaz Group. (2007). MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 22(1), 1–39. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Quinn, N. (Ed.). (2005). Finding culture in talk: A collection of methods. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Russel, J.A., Fernández-Dols, J.M., Manstead, A.S.R., & Wellenkamp, J.C. (Eds.). (1995). Everyday conceptions of emotion. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Semino, E. (2008). Metaphor in discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Soriano, C. (2005). The conceptualization of anger in English and Spanish: A cognitive approach. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Soriano, C., Fontaine, J., & Scherer, K. (this voume). Surprise in the GRID.
Stefanowitsch, A. (2006). Words and their metaphors. In A. Stefanowitsch & S.T. Gries (Eds.), Corpus-based approaches to metaphor and metonymy (pp. 64–105). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilson, P. (Ed.). (2012). Dynamicity in emotion concepts. Frankfurt: Peter Lang. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (40)

Cited by 40 other publications

Menete, Sérgio N., Guiying Jiang & Xu Qinliang
2025. Conceptualisation of mental activities through the body part ləbb ‘heart’ in Amharic. Review of Cognitive Linguistics DOI logo
Wang, Yinjie & Agnès Tutin
2025. Tu plaisantes ? Ma parole ! Étude de quelques motifs récurrents exprimant la surprise dans les dialogues romanesques contemporains français. Corpus 27 DOI logo
Wang, Yinjie & Agnès Tutin
2025. Tu plaisantes ? Ma parole ! Étude de quelques motifs récurrents exprimant la surprise dans les dialogues romanesques contemporains français. Corpus 27 DOI logo
Zoltán Kövecses, Réka Benczes, Anna Rommel & Veronika Szelid
2024. Universality versus variation in the conceptualization of anger: A question of methodology. Russian Journal of Linguistics 28:1 ► pp. 55 ff. DOI logo
McKeown, Jamie
2024. A contrastive investigation of the performative and descriptive use of surprise frames in judicial opinions of the HKSAR. Journal of Pragmatics 232 ► pp. 41 ff. DOI logo
Menete, Sérgio N. & Guiying Jiang
2024. Another member out of the family: the description of manner of gait in Changana verbs of motion. Folia Linguistica 58:2 ► pp. 401 ff. DOI logo
Menete, Sérgio N. & Guiying Jiang
2025. The semantics of the polysemic Amharic word fit ‘face’. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 23:2 ► pp. 510 ff. DOI logo
Vidal Noguera, Carmen & Irini Mavrou
2024. ‘A surprise I will never forget’: How do adolescent Spanish-German heritage speakers express the emotion of surprise in both their heritage language and the societal language?. International Journal of Bilingualism DOI logo
Cifuentes Honrubia, José Luis
2023.  (No) faltaba/faltaría más . In Verb and Context [IVITRA Research in Linguistics and Literature, 34], ► pp. 99 ff. DOI logo
Csillag, Andrea
2023. Metaphorical Meanings of Some Prepositions in English Expressions of Sadness. Romanian Journal of English Studies 20:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Julich-Warpakowski, Nina & Paula Pérez-Sobrino
2023.  M. Bolognesi, M. Brdar, & K. Despot (eds.) (2019). Metaphor and metonymy in the digital age. Theory and methods for building repositories of figurative language. John Benjamins (Metaphor in Language, Cognition, and Communication, 8).. Language and Cognition 15:3 ► pp. 622 ff. DOI logo
Li, Jinyan & Zi Ouyang
2023. Review of Yu (2022): Moral Metaphor System: A Conceptual Metaphor Approach. Journal of Language and Politics 22:6 ► pp. 952 ff. DOI logo
Soriano, Cristina & Javier Valenzuela
2022. The size of shame and pride. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 20:1 ► pp. 210 ff. DOI logo
Wang, Qian & Guangwei Hu
2022. What surprises, interests and confuses researchers? A frame-based analysis of knowledge emotion markers in research articles. Lingua 279 ► pp. 103426 ff. DOI logo
Bosman, Nerina & Elsabé Taljard
2021. A Cross-Linguistic Study of BLOOD Metaphors in Afrikaans and Northern Sotho. Language Matters 52:1 ► pp. 3 ff. DOI logo
Chen, Lang & Guangwei Hu
2020. Mediating Knowledge through Expressing Surprises: A Frame-based Analysis of Surprise Markers in Research Articles across Disciplines and Research Paradigms. Discourse Processes 57:8 ► pp. 659 ff. DOI logo
Piata, Anna
2020. Stylistic humor across modalities. Internet Pragmatics 3:2 ► pp. 174 ff. DOI logo
Piata, Anna
2022. Stylistic humor across modalities. In The Pragmatics of Internet Memes [Benjamins Current Topics, 120], ► pp. 36 ff. DOI logo
Yu, Ning
2020. Linguistic embodiment in linguistic experience. In Body Part Terms in Conceptualization and Language Usage [Cognitive Linguistic Studies in Cultural Contexts, 12], ► pp. 11 ff. DOI logo
Bolognesi, Marianna & Kristina Despot
2019. Fantastic metaphors and where to find them. In Metaphor and Metonymy in the Digital Age [Metaphor in Language, Cognition, and Communication, 8], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Kövecses, Zoltán, Laura Ambrus, Dániel Hegedűs, Ren Imai & Anna Sobczak
2019. The lexical vs. corpus-based method in the study of metaphors. In Metaphor and Metonymy in the Digital Age [Metaphor in Language, Cognition, and Communication, 8], ► pp. 149 ff. DOI logo
Lemghari, El Mustapha
2019. A metaphor-based account of semantic relations among proverbs. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 6:1 ► pp. 158 ff. DOI logo
Lemghari, El Mustapha
2022. On the Role of Source and Target Words’ Meanings in Metaphorical Conceptualizations. Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 67:1 ► pp. 73 ff. DOI logo
Yu, Ning & Jie Huang
2019. Primary Metaphors across Languages: Difficulty as Weight and Solidity. Metaphor and Symbol 34:2 ► pp. 111 ff. DOI logo
Shea, Jordan Edward, Cecilia Ovesdotter Alm & Reynold Bailey
2018. 2018 IEEE Western New York Image and Signal Processing Workshop (WNYISPW), ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Kövecses, Zoltán
2017. Levels of metaphor. Cognitive Linguistics 28:2 ► pp. 321 ff. DOI logo
Kövecses, Zoltán
2019. Perception and metaphor. In Perception Metaphors [Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research, 19], ► pp. 327 ff. DOI logo
Kövecses, Zoltán
2020. Extended Conceptual Metaphor Theory, DOI logo
Kövecses, Zoltán
2020. A multi-level view of metaphor and some of its advantages. In Figurative Meaning Construction in Thought and Language [Figurative Thought and Language, 9], ► pp. 71 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2020. The Abstract Understood Figuratively, the Concrete Understood Literally, but the Concrete Understood Figuratively?. In Extended Conceptual Metaphor Theory, ► pp. 22 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2020. Conceptual or Contextual?. In Extended Conceptual Metaphor Theory, ► pp. 93 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2020. References. In Extended Conceptual Metaphor Theory, ► pp. 186 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2020. A Brief Outline of “Standard” Conceptual Metaphor Theory and Some Outstanding Issues. In Extended Conceptual Metaphor Theory, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2020. Direct or Indirect Emergence?. In Extended Conceptual Metaphor Theory, ► pp. 34 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2020. Offline or Online?. In Extended Conceptual Metaphor Theory, ► pp. 117 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2020. Index. In Extended Conceptual Metaphor Theory, ► pp. 194 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2020. Domains, Schemas, Frames, or Spaces?. In Extended Conceptual Metaphor Theory, ► pp. 50 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2020. The Shape of the Extended View of CMT. In Extended Conceptual Metaphor Theory, ► pp. 150 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2020. By Way of Conclusion: Responses to the Five Questions. In Extended Conceptual Metaphor Theory, ► pp. 169 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2020. Preface. In Extended Conceptual Metaphor Theory, ► pp. xi ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue